Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sen. Rob Portman: I’ve changed my mind and support gay marriage now
Hotair ^ | 03/15/2013 | AllahPundit

Posted on 03/15/2013 10:54:31 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

Interesting for many reasons. Timing: He's dropping this during CPAC, when political media is focused on competing factions within conservative thought, and shortly before the Supreme Court takes up a landmark case on Prop 8 and DOMA. Enthusiasm: He didn't casually mention this during a standard Q&A with a reporter. He called three Ohio journalists to his office for the announcement, granted CNN an on-camera interview, and published an op-ed in today's Columbus Dispatch. He’s really throwing some weight behind it. Prominence: Portman was, of course, a shortlister for VP and is the lone GOP senator from America's ultimate swing state. More than that, he's the first sitting Republican member of the Senate to endorse legalizing same-sex marriage. The Supreme Court amicus brief filed by pro-gay-marriage Republicans a few weeks ago was conspicuous for its lack of any big-name incumbents as signatories. Portman's a big name.

Why'd he switch? Like Dick Cheney, whom Portman met with to discuss this, his view changed when he found out someone in his family is gay:

Portman said his own evolution on the issue began in 2011, when [his son] Will, then a freshman at Yale University, made a stunning revelation.

“Will … came to Jane and me and announced that he was gay, that it was not a choice. It was who he is and he had been that way since he could remember,” Portman recalled of the conversation. “Jane and I were both surprised, very surprised, but also very supportive of him. Our reaction was not about policy or positions. It was about him as a son and letting him know we were 110 percent supportive of him.”

His son’s homosexuality “allowed me to think about this issue from a new perspective, and that’s as a dad who loves his son a lot,” Portman said. He said he wants Will to have the same chance at an enduring relationship, “like Jane and I have had for over 26 years.”…

Portman said his previous views on marriage were rooted in his faith.

But “the overriding message of love and compassion that I take from the Bible . . . and the fact that I believe we are all created by our maker . . . that has all influenced me in terms of my change on this issue,” he said.

He says he told the Romney camp about his son last year when he was vetted for VP and that they told him it was no problem. Imagine, though, putting Portman on the ticket and then having news break that the vice presidential nominee, who once voted for a constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage, has a gay son. The media’s coverage of Portman for the rest of the campaign would have been filtered through the issue of SSM and Romney surely knew it. Is that something he would have wanted given his intense messaging emphasis on the economy?

Mollie Hemingway makes a fair point, too:

Leaving apart the question of whether marriage law should be changed, this strikes me as a problematic approach. I mean, marriage law should be changed or it shouldn’t be changed — but it shouldn’t hinge on the sexual attractions of one senator’s son, should it?

What if a conservative senator said, “I’m reversing my views on whether abortion should be legal because my daughter got pregnant and wished she weren’t.”

One of the fascinating things about society today is that personal experience trumps everything else in argumentation. Very few people seem to care about fundamental truths and principles while everyone seems to care about personal experience and emotion. It’s the Oprahfication of political philosophy.

Yeah, I’m loath to scold the guy for his reasoning given that I agree with him and that he’s taking on a bit of political risk in doing this, but why did he need his son to come out to get him to look at this issue from the perspective of someone who’s gay? He’s been a professional legislator for years; he’s supposed to consider all sides of an issue when deciding which policy to support. That’s a surprisingly parochial approach to a national debate that’s been rolling around for a solid decade now. Makes me wonder if his feelings on the subject really did change recently or if he’s always quietly been open to gay marriage but only felt politically safe to announce it once he discovered his son’s orientation. Conservative primary voters may be less likely to hold it against him if they think it’s a decision driven by fatherly love for his son.

Anyway, who’s next? The real significance of Portman endorsing SSM is that it gives political cover to other GOP incumbents who might secretly agree with him to speak up too. Republicans from solidly red states will remain opposed but there are plenty of purple-state possibilities. Susan Collins seems like a given. Murkowski can probably get away with it in Alaska. Mark Kirk would pay no heavy penalty in Illinois. Maybe Kelly Ayotte too, or do her national ambitions prevent that (for now)? There’ll be more.

TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: gaymarriage; homosexuality; robportman
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 last
To: SeekAndFind

I don’t think that there was ever a time on FR when Portman was not known as a rino, and that goes back years.

This isn’t a huge surprise.

61 posted on 03/15/2013 12:20:40 PM PDT by ansel12 ( August 29,2008 A Natural Born Reformer inadvertently unleashed within palace walls, change ensues.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeevedPatriot

I understand that recalls are a double edged sword since the Dems use them for purely political purposes. Yet to me, IMO ect, there should be more of them and ballot measures to install the laws required where they currently are not.

My reasoning is thus...

Politicians fear nothing but their unemployment. Term limits are needed, but that has proven legally tenuous in several places/cases. Recalls serve the same end, but ALSO put the pols under the gun. If they are faced with the threat of recall, a SERIOUS threat with teeth, they will not bend so easily to the dark side.

Secondly, once a recall starts, they spend their time and money fighting it rather than passing further BS laws that are often wholly unconstitutional. Which is probably the cause of a recall to begin with. At least on our side of the fence.

Win/Win for America.

62 posted on 03/15/2013 12:26:14 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: nitzy

Portman has proven to have no spine, so he probably would go on TV and say he changed his mind about adultery.

63 posted on 03/15/2013 12:51:35 PM PDT by FamiliarFace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I’m with everyone else here who has ended support for Portman. Either there are ‘fundamental truths’ or there aren’t. I’ll look for another politician with conviction to lead by principle, not by whims. “You cannot legislate morals, but you can legislate morally.”
It matters not what other people do in their bedrooms to me. But holy matrimony is a sacrament from God, not to be destroyed by the sins of man. Get government OUT of the Church’s business. Everyone should be equal under the law, therefore everyone should be subject to civil unions. It’s the only way to save the church from the Evil coming.

64 posted on 03/15/2013 1:19:31 PM PDT by griswold3 (Big Government does not tolerate rivals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeevedPatriot

I think Jim Jordan may be the lone conservative.

65 posted on 03/15/2013 1:26:34 PM PDT by FamiliarFace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“Senator Portman—you’re a homoooooh!” Eric Estrada

66 posted on 03/15/2013 1:39:18 PM PDT by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: All armed conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: txrefugee

RE: Get rid of this embarrassment, Ohio.

First, Ohio votes for Obama, then John Kasich caves on Obamacare, now this...

I’m just about ready to give up on this state ( and to think they voted against Kerry in 2004 ).

67 posted on 03/15/2013 2:19:10 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Kazan

“The same thing that is wrong with the rest of the nation. Too many buy the rhetoric of Republicans pretending to be conservative.”

Yeah, you speak the truth. I have to count myself in your commentary. I actually sent that @$$hole McLame $100 during the ‘08 election. Now, in hindsight, as bad as Obama is, I firmly believe that a McLame presidency would have been far worse for the reasons you state. He would have been like boiling a frog. We would have gotten a lot more bad legislation passed because the “repubicans” would have supported the same crap as Obama has given us.

68 posted on 03/15/2013 2:25:27 PM PDT by vette6387
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: laweeks
Taft,Dewine.Boner etc. Yeah we have team full of winners in Ohio!
69 posted on 03/15/2013 2:36:48 PM PDT by bonehead4freedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

If this becomes GOP policy, I’m out!

70 posted on 03/15/2013 2:56:30 PM PDT by upcountryhorseman (An old fashioned conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upcountryhorseman

GOP = Gay Old Party

71 posted on 03/15/2013 2:57:19 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: FamiliarFace

Don’t know much about him although I had forgotten him. Thanks.

72 posted on 03/15/2013 3:16:08 PM PDT by PeevedPatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson