Posted on 03/14/2013 8:51:03 AM PDT by Perdogg
Ted Cruz and Dianne Feinstein had this explosive exchange at a Senate Judiciary Hearing on guns earlier today:
(Excerpt) Read more at weeklystandard.com ...
Feinstein - “I’m not a lawyer, but after 20 years I’ve been up close and personal to the Constitution. I have great respect for it.”
LoL, your agenda is to tear the Constitution down.
Cruz didn’t run the argument out before he made it and got caught.
People need to learn how to do that, run every possible counter to one’s own argument out in one’s own mind before making and then blowing the argument.
Preferably, wrapped around a brick!
Thats the real problem!
You are Welcome!
“The Catechism of the Constitution
Thanks, gotta order this one.”
You are welcome!
Running the argument out with every possible counter argument would have shown where the argument is vulnerable. Doing this before making the argument will reveal whether the argument will stand or fall. If you realise it will fall - make a different argument.
Take Sandy Hook for instance, it would have been just as easy to kill as many kids with a car by running a group of them over, or by hijack a bus and ram it into a above ground fuel tank. That could happen just as often as mass murders with “assault rifles”. This argument illustrates the real problem as not being assault rifles, it's deranged individuals.
She sure got agitated when challenged. 20 years on that committee??? Waaaaaayyy tooooo long.
Feinstein has a serious mental disorder.
As do most of democrats
Weapons of war . . . high-powered military weapons . . . yada, yada, yada...
Emotional (unthinking) slut. If the Redcoats had been armed with modern military weapons, does the emotional (unthinking) slut feeeeel the Framers could have won with single shot muskets?
Yes! That’s how running the argument out in your own mind before you make it will prepare you for every possible outcome.
If you do that and are read let them drag in the kiddie porn argument - them nail them!
yep, she hates freedom of others.
Lying Commie B
Why do you want to dirty a rooled up copy of the Bill of Rights?
I would like to see one of them imploding bullets.
Our ruling class has less concern for us than your average rancher has for his livestock.
Feinstein said, “Why allow them’ (”Assault Weapons”) in a rhetorical question.
She know the true answer to the question, and does not like it as she and her Dem buddies who are wanna be tyrants. Those guns, protected by the 2nd Amendment, stand in the way of their dictatorial dreams.
A question is a lecture?
This gal is an imbecile.
Did anyone notice what Durbin said?
“None of these rights are absolute.”
Like hell they aren’t! I wish I could say that I find it hard to believe the voters are stupid enough to elect such idiots but the fact that she’s been in Congress so long and the result of our last election prove that they are.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.