Replies

I wouldn't personally advise anyone to read the Freeh report, since about 80% of it is nothing but editorializing without mcuh evidence. Kind of like the stuff "the Coliform" posts, although not as stupid or deceptive. The 20% of the Freeh reports that's actually factual is mostly retread stuff from the Grand Jury spun in a way to make the Board of Trustees look good; well, that's what Freeh was paid to do, so he gets a gold star from the "let's move on," bunch.

Ever notice how the "let's move on," crowd is composed of people who know they haven't got any facts on their side but don't want the narrative they've established to be challenged? I'm for "moving on" with the Board of Trustees the same way I was for "moving on" with Bill Clinton: by getting his resignation.

It's time for the Coliform to move on, too. He hasn't yet managed to post a factual article on FR, but he sure has set a record for number of exclamation marks per post!!!!!!! Maybe they could use his kind at MoveOn.org.

I wouldn't personally advise anyone to read the Freeh report, since about 80% of it is nothing but editorializing without much evidence.

You're right.

The lynch mob here think that they are conservative but they are no better than the leftist lynch mob that rose up in Sanford Florida a year ago.

Declaring someone guilty in lieu of evidence and without due process of law is part of the leftist mindset that this lynch mob adheres to.

Hmmm, you think the fact that no one returned Freeh’s phone calls had anything to do with “Editorializing about known evidence”?

Self-fulfilling logic for Penn State Alumni - The Freeh report is junk because there is little factual info. No one talked to Freeh because he was not intended on getting the facts.

The problem is not with the massive CYA at Penn State, it’s with Freeh - Right Alumni?