Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BroJoeK

Yes, Lincoln broke laws. “Union never formally declared war.”

What do we call invasions conducted without a formal declaration of war?


443 posted on 03/13/2013 4:15:13 PM PDT by JCBreckenridge (Texas is a state of mind - Steinbeck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 437 | View Replies ]


To: JCBreckenridge
What do we call invasions conducted without a formal declaration of war?

Declare war on who? The United States? You declare war on other countries and not rebellious parts of your own.

But since you're on the subject, if it really considered itself a sovereign nation then shouldn't the Confederacy have declared war on the U.S. before attacking Fort Sumter?

444 posted on 03/13/2013 4:57:24 PM PDT by 0.E.O
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 443 | View Replies ]

To: JCBreckenridge
JCBreckenridge: "Yes, Lincoln broke laws."

We can say Lincoln broke no laws because: Congress eventually approved everything he did.
But more to my point: unlike Jefferson Davis, Lincoln broke no laws for the purpose of destroying the US Constitution.
Instead, all of Lincoln's efforts were to save the Union and its Constitution.

BJK: “Union never formally declared war.”

JCBreckenridge: "What do we call invasions conducted without a formal declaration of war?"

In all of history, formal declarations of war have only been used between nation-states, never to defeat rebellions.
That's why the Confederacy declared war on the United States -- because it wanted to show that it too was a nation-state.
The Union did not declare war because it considered the Confederacy a rebellion.

463 posted on 03/15/2013 1:59:11 AM PDT by BroJoeK (a little historical perspective....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 443 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson