Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cops’ firing for drugs reversed; Report slams testing
Boston Herald ^ | March 07, 2013 | n/a

Posted on 03/07/2013 2:23:06 PM PST by Ken H

Six Boston cops fired after testing positive for cocaine have been ordered reinstated — with back pay — after a state board struck down hair tests as unreliable in a bombshell ruling that could have a far-reaching impact on how city workers are drug-tested.

In a stunning, 134-page ruling, the Massachusetts Civil Service Commission this week ordered the six cops back on the job, finding that “the present state of hair testing for drugs of abuse ... does not meet the standard of reliability necessary to be routinely used” to fire someone.

(Excerpt) Read more at bostonherald.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cocaine; donutwatch; drugs; drugtesting; powdereddonutwatch

1 posted on 03/07/2013 2:23:12 PM PST by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Ken H

So how many are in prison because of this testing???


2 posted on 03/07/2013 2:30:28 PM PST by SkyDancer (Live your life in such a way that the Westboro church will want to picket your funeral.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer

Police Union! Simple! nothing new here!
Cops work better on cocaine!
Who knew Dunkin was the Cocaine pit stop for Cops!


3 posted on 03/07/2013 2:39:22 PM PST by Conserev1 ("Still Clinging to my Bible and my Weapon")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer
So how many are in prison because of this testing???

Just us lowly serfs.

4 posted on 03/07/2013 2:41:18 PM PST by JustSayNoToNannies ("The Lord has removed His judgments against you" - Zep. 3:15)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer

It’s unlikely that anyone is in prison as a result of this kind of testing, but it is frequently used in employment situations and in custody disputes. There are several possibilities in this case: 1) the Judge ignored the scientific proof. 2)The scientific proof was poorly presented, in which case he’s really obligated to ignore it; or 3)The evidence was carefully presented and vetted and the scientific accuracy of the testing really is unreliable, in which case the implications in all kinds of employment and custody proceedings are huge.


5 posted on 03/07/2013 2:48:19 PM PST by Cincinnatus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ken H

I like Slovak Poppyseed pastries. Would I test positive for narcotics?


6 posted on 03/07/2013 2:52:39 PM PST by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ( Ya can't pick up a turd by the clean end!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinnatus

Or, maybe, the cops used drugs and the lawyers challenged the evidence. Just like in DUI’s - first thing in law 101 is to challenge the evidence.


7 posted on 03/07/2013 3:08:53 PM PST by SkyDancer (Live your life in such a way that the Westboro church will want to picket your funeral.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Bogus Pachysandra
“I like Slovak Poppyseed pastries. Would I test positive for narcotics?”

It's possible with enough poppy seeds. Some companies and probation officers even force you to sign a “no poppy seeds” agreement so you can't contest a positive test.

But hey, your right to eat poppy seeds is not as important as “our children's” right to a “drug free world”. We already sacrificed privacy rights and the right to be free from unreasonable searches. Giving up poppy bagels is but a small sacrifice for the good of the glorious drug-free state to come, comrade.

8 posted on 03/07/2013 3:39:53 PM PST by varyouga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Bogus Pachysandra

Absolutely, eating even a small amount of Poppy Seeds will yield a Positive test for opiates.


9 posted on 03/07/2013 5:16:07 PM PST by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Ken H
Having read the article...it sounds like at least two of the cops who were fired WERE probably wrongfully terminated, based on one random drug test.

Having had experience in writing “drug free workplace” policy statements to comply with state and federal policy (not law), it’s pretty clear that one positive random test result, absent any specific accusations of diminished capacity, is not grounds for termination.
It does establish grounds for frequent testing, investigation, and evaluation, and possibly treatment for addictions.

The point of “random drug tests” was to deter illegal drug usage.
Epic fail, but we who screamed out against it decades ago could have told you it would be routinely abused.

10 posted on 03/07/2013 5:23:59 PM PST by sarasmom (The obvious takes longer to discover for the obtuse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ken H

One law for thee, another for me, example 3,529,746.


11 posted on 03/07/2013 10:13:48 PM PST by Altariel ("Curse your sudden but inevitable betrayal!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson