Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dorner Manhunt Reveals Police Contempt for Public Safety
Reason ^ | February 15, 2013 | Steven Greenhut

Posted on 02/22/2013 3:37:46 PM PST by neverdem

Police typically say that their top mission is to protect “public safety.” That’s the lingo. But the recently concluded manhunt for former Los Angeles Police Department officer Christopher Dorner, accused of murdering four people after releasing a manifesto decrying his 2008 firing from the force, suggests that concern about the public’s actual safety sometimes is fairly low on the list of police priorities.

Last weekend, police opened fire on a 71-year-old newspaper carrier and her 47-year-old daughter who had the misfortune of driving a pick-up truck police thought might be Dorner’s. The Los Angeles police detectives who opened fire on them, putting two bullets in the older woman’s back, didn’t do much double checking. The carriers' truck was a different make and color from Dorner’s.

As the women’s attorney told the Los Angeles Times: “The problem with the situation is it looked like the police had the goal of administering street justice and in so doing, didn't take the time to notice that these two older, small Latina women don't look like a large black man.” This could be written off as a sad fluke, except that 25 minutes later different officers opened fire on a different truck—once again getting key details wrong. Can’t officers at least check the license plate, and issue a warning, before opening fire?

“Nobody trains police officers to look for one of their own,” said Maria Haberfeld, a police-training professor at John Jay College in New York, according to the Web site News One. “I wouldn’t want to be in their shoes and I don’t think anybody else would.” We all understand the situation. But saying that we wouldn’t want to be “in their shoes” is no excuse for such dangerous behavior. The police wouldn’t excuse a member of the public for misusing a firearm, regardless of how stressed out that person felt.

News One also published the photograph of a gray Ford truck in the Los Angeles area with a hand-made “Don’t Shoot, Not Dorner, Thank You” poster on the back window. T-shirts and bumper stickers have popped up to similar effect. Those are funny in a dark way, but police ought to recognize how poorly this reflects on them and their strategies. It’s sad when people are more worried about the police than they are about a murderer on the loose.

“Simply put, the police culture in our country has changed,” argued former San Jose Police Chief Joe McNamara, a Hoover Institution scholar, in a Wall Street Journal article in 2006. “An emphasis on ‘officer safety’ and paramilitary training pervades today’s policing, in contrast to the older culture, which held that cops didn’t shoot until they were about to be shot or stabbed.”

Murders are sadly routine in the Los Angeles area. The massive police presence was the result of the killer targeting their own, thus leading to the reasonable conclusion that police pulled out the stops not because the public was in danger but because they were in danger. I don’t blame police for their efforts, but I also understand why residents in, say, South Los Angeles, wondered why killings in their community don’t rate the same attention.

With crime rates at 40-year lows, this is an opportune time for a debate about such police-priority issues free from excess emotionalism.

Media reports have focused on the rantings within Dorner’s manifesto. But a lot of it is about bureaucratic indifference—about police officials who, in his mind, didn't care about the communities they are sworn to protect. Nothing justifies such violence and I'm sickened by people who are celebrating Dorner, but even the LAPD is re-opening the case of Dorner’s firing. Perhaps the department will try to glean some broader lessons from this tragedy.

Currently, a case before the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals is evaluating the lengths to which police are required to go to protect innocent bystanders. The case involves Sacramento police who were trailing a suspect who had run from his car and then hid in a tree in a family’s backyard. A police helicopter spotted him. So an officer released a police dog into the yard even though people were having a gathering in the backyard.

Police dogs are trained to bite and hold suspects, but they can’t distinguish between law-abiding citizens relaxing with friends and police suspects. So Bandit attacked the first person it saw. Instead of instituting reform and settling with the family, Sacramento PD has been arguing that “officer safety” would be endangered by requiring a reasonable warning before releasing a vicious dog on private property.

It’s frightening to think that police can use deadly force without taking even the most modest steps to protect innocent bystanders. It’s even more frightening to hear people defend this approach. Yes, officer safety is important. But so is the public’s safety. It's time to grapple with the proper balance.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: banglist; dorner; dornermanhunt; policeculture; publicsafety
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 241-247 next last
To: Alaska Wolf

Make sure you lace your boots up nice and tight before taking on the big boys there sport.


81 posted on 02/22/2013 6:02:19 PM PST by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Alaska Wolf
*shrug* That does look like what you were saying. Seems to me I'm not the only one who reads what you post and draws the same conclusion - you think it was A-OK to blaze away in the dark.

Did you ever think that if multiple people read you the same way that the problem might, just might, not be the rest of the world? Do you ever think, or just emote?

And you're telling me to keep up?

I'm way ahead of you.

82 posted on 02/22/2013 6:06:03 PM PST by null and void (Gun confiscation enables tyranny. Don't enable tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: donna

He didn’t arrest the hungry man, he shot him. Because the man wouldn’t step away from the buffet table.


83 posted on 02/22/2013 6:07:16 PM PST by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Chode

Or concoct story later.


84 posted on 02/22/2013 6:11:02 PM PST by Huskerfan44 (Huskerfan44)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: null and void
you think

Obviously I do. You emote, drama queen.

85 posted on 02/22/2013 6:13:20 PM PST by Alaska Wolf (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

OMG, you’re one of the “big boys”, drama queen? You’ve already been squashed and I wear Russell boots without laces.


86 posted on 02/22/2013 6:19:34 PM PST by Alaska Wolf (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

Thanks for the ping driftdiver!

I saw this thread earlier just after it was posted and thought I’d check in later to read the posts.

LOL, turned out just like I figured it would!


87 posted on 02/22/2013 6:20:35 PM PST by Las Vegas Ron (Medicine is the keystone in the arch of socialism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Avoiding_Sulla
I had a short conversation with an LAPD detective about the shooting in Torrance. What he told me:
Yada yada
Yada yada
The pickup was moving with its lights off.
Yada yada
Yada yada

The media has not mentioned nor this piece at “Reason.”

The cop lied to you. Lights were on


88 posted on 02/22/2013 6:24:28 PM PST by Oztrich Boy (I think, therefore I am what I yam, and that's all I yam - "Popeye" Descartes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Alaska Wolf

Obviously? It doesn’t seem to be obvious to others on this thread.

Some of us see you throwing hissyfits and emoting.

Who? Wellllll, I’ll leave that as an exercise for the reader.

The thinking ones will be able to figure it out for themselves.

Good luck with that...


89 posted on 02/22/2013 6:28:45 PM PST by null and void (Gun confiscation enables tyranny. Don't enable tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: null and void
Some of us see you throwing hissyfits and emoting.

Your fantasizing is amusing and entertaining.

90 posted on 02/22/2013 6:32:37 PM PST by Alaska Wolf (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2
Lights off are probable cause?

Most of the time the lights were on. The driver said she made a practice of turning them off momentarily whenever the light was going to hit the window of a residence.

91 posted on 02/22/2013 6:33:59 PM PST by Oztrich Boy (I think, therefore I am what I yam, and that's all I yam - "Popeye" Descartes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Oztrich Boy

Lights off, lights on. It was dark. The cops were skeerd of trucks. That makes it OK.


92 posted on 02/22/2013 6:46:08 PM PST by null and void (Gun confiscation enables tyranny. Don't enable tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: null and void

The friend I know in the LAPD said that if nothing else their career is over.


93 posted on 02/22/2013 6:47:27 PM PST by ThomasThomas (Normal isn't normal anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Avoiding_Sulla

Oh, PLEASE!! Let’s hear the excuse for the other truck, which was stopped, let go, moved a short distance, and then was rammed AND shot up.


94 posted on 02/22/2013 6:49:13 PM PST by Politicalmom (Liberalism. Ideas so great they have to be mandatory.-FReeper Osage Orange)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
But the recently concluded manhunt for former Los Angeles Police Department officer Christopher Dorner, accused of murdering four people after releasing a manifesto decrying his 2008 firing from the force, suggests that concern about the public’s actual safety sometimes is fairly low on the list of police priorities.

They can talk "protect and serve" all they want, but the reality is that they train for "officer safety" above all else, including public safety.

That's what we get with unionized police.

95 posted on 02/22/2013 6:50:58 PM PST by Carry_Okie (The environment is too complex and too important to be "protected" by government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
As the women’s attorney told the Los Angeles Times: “The problem with the situation is it looked like the police had the goal of administering street justice and in so doing, didn't take the time to notice that these two older, small Latina women don't look like a large black man.” This could be written off as a sad fluke, except that 25 minutes later different officers opened fire on a different truck—once again getting key details wrong. Can’t officers at least check the license plate, and issue a warning, before opening fire?

Damn Cop Hater!!!! I say shoot’em all and let God sort’em out!! What are you! Some kinda Libertarian nut??? /s

96 posted on 02/22/2013 6:52:38 PM PST by saleman (!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ThomasThomas

Perhaps, but that’s not the way I’d bet.


97 posted on 02/22/2013 6:53:11 PM PST by null and void (Gun confiscation enables tyranny. Don't enable tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: varyouga

Excellent questions. I’d like some public answers.

Some say that the difference between a cop and a criminal is sometimes just the uniform. I’m not quite that cynical. I know some good officers and have had some family members who were cops. But there seem to be more and more incidents these days involving cops who are out of line.


98 posted on 02/22/2013 6:55:55 PM PST by generally (Don't be stupid. We have politicians for that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Alaska Wolf

You’ve been on FR since ‘03 and haven’t learned better manners yet? Are you just on here to be rude to other FReepers?


99 posted on 02/22/2013 6:57:26 PM PST by Shimmer1 (No matter how cynical I get, I just can't keep up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

In before the

“jackbootlicking copsuckers”

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/2990015/posts?page=39#39


100 posted on 02/22/2013 7:00:20 PM PST by Kevmo ("A person's a person, no matter how small" ~Horton Hears a Who)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 241-247 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson