Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

7th Circuit Court Lets Posner Ruling Stand; Huge Win For Concealed Carry
1 posted on 02/22/2013 1:16:16 PM PST by EXCH54FE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: EXCH54FE

Good on Alan Gottlieb and SAF.
They are doing excellent work on the legal front.


2 posted on 02/22/2013 1:19:16 PM PST by mylife (The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EXCH54FE
Left-wing judges will next turn their backs on stare decisis.
3 posted on 02/22/2013 1:21:28 PM PST by Steely Tom (If the Constitution can be a living document, I guess a corporation can be a person.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EXCH54FE

A good day for the rights of citizens. Considering the other affronts ongoing and being attempted, this is good news indeed. Hope the 7th Circuit holds their feet to the fire and requires action no matter any appeals process.


4 posted on 02/22/2013 1:30:33 PM PST by T-Bird45 (It feels like the seventies, and it shouldn't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EXCH54FE

Wonder if Madigan will take this to the Supremes? It would be great to have this ruling applicable throughout the country! I guess the SAF will if she doesn’t.


5 posted on 02/22/2013 1:36:37 PM PST by vette6387
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EXCH54FE

soory- Judge you are dead wrong-wrong-wrong - the right to bear arms is a WAR term which EXPLICITLY means to carry, furnish, be equipped with, support arms, for WAR.
Look it up in the 19th century Webster dictionaries that have been faithful to its centuries-old true etymology.
KEEP has nothing to do with arms in the home- it means you can KEEP ARMS ANYWHERE=- VIZ= The Second Amendment has no limits on geographical location nor firepower.

French, Dutch and English documents dating from the 15th Century all have BEARING ARMS and WAR in the same sentences. Look it up, BEARING ARMS is never used anywhere in self defence “AGAINST BURGLARS..”
preposterous!
Definition of to “KEEP” ‘ to preserve and maintain.. TO GUARD; DEFEND
to “KEEP” `means NOT TO LET GO ONE`S POSSESSION OR CONTROL’
“KEEPER”,n., “one who watches, GUARDS, maintains”

to “BEAR: 1. to support and move; CARRY.
2. to be equipped furnished ..as to BEAR A SWORD.
3, to be directed; to be pointed, as TO PLANT GUNS TO BEAR UPON AS TRENCH’”

Webster`s Dictionary 1887


9 posted on 02/22/2013 2:05:30 PM PST by bunkerhill7 ("The Second Amendment has no limits on firepower"-NY State Senator Marchione.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EXCH54FE

soory- Judge you are dead wrong-wrong-wrong - the right to bear arms is a WAR term which EXPLICITLY means to carry, furnish, be equipped with, support arms, for WAR.
Look it up in the 19th century Webster dictionaries that have been faithful to its centuries-old true etymology.
KEEP has nothing to do with arms in the home- it means you can KEEP ARMS ANYWHERE=- VIZ= The Second Amendment has no limits on geographical location nor firepower.

French, Dutch and English documents dating from the 15th Century all have BEARING ARMS and WAR in the same sentences. Look it up, BEARING ARMS is never used anywhere in self defence “AGAINST BURGLARS..”
preposterous!
Definition of to “KEEP” ‘ to preserve and maintain.. TO GUARD; DEFEND
to “KEEP” `means NOT TO LET GO ONE`S POSSESSION OR CONTROL’
“KEEPER”,n., “one who watches, GUARDS, maintains”

to “BEAR: 1. to support and move; CARRY.
2. to be equipped furnished ..as to BEAR A SWORD.
3, to be directed; to be pointed, as TO PLANT GUNS TO BEAR UPON AS TRENCH’”

Webster`s Dictionary 1887


10 posted on 02/22/2013 2:05:30 PM PST by bunkerhill7 ("The Second Amendment has no limits on firepower"-NY State Senator Marchione.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EXCH54FE; marktwain

Pinging marktwain!


11 posted on 02/22/2013 2:05:54 PM PST by TEXOKIE (We must surrender only to our Holy God and never to the evil that has befallen us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EXCH54FE

When will we get a ruling like this that applies to the poor schmucks who live in the most populous state (by far) of Union — California — limiting the unlimited power of the vile SOBs in Sacramento? What, the Bill of Rights doesn’t apply to 12% of the American people?


12 posted on 02/22/2013 2:28:12 PM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EXCH54FE

“It is now up to the legislature,” Gottlieb said, “to craft a statute that recognizes the right of ordinary citizens to carry outside the home, without a sea of red tape or a requirement to prove any kind of need beyond the cause of personal protection.”

We need this in my state. I can’t even carry a rifle in the car and rounds at the same time and I am considered to be carrying a loaded weapon. SO? I’m carrying a loaded F150, a hunting knife, and a tire iron too.

I just want to keep a .22 in the truck loaded with some stingers in case of emergency...is that so wrong?


13 posted on 02/22/2013 2:43:59 PM PST by ez (Laws only apply to little people. Criminals, politicians, and newsies are exempt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EXCH54FE

the judge did the right thing.


15 posted on 02/22/2013 3:07:09 PM PST by what is up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Skeeter


GO AHEAD SHINE MY SHOES

22 posted on 02/23/2013 4:18:57 AM PST by devolve ( -------- -- --It is not where Obama was born that is the problem - it is where he*s living now--)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson