Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White House unveils awaited Affordable Care Act profit margin rule
The Hill ^ | 2/16/13 | Ben Goad

Posted on 02/16/2013 7:20:45 PM PST by Libloather

A proposed federal rule to cap profit margins for certain health insurance plans and prescription drug benefit programs is now available for review.

The latest in a raft of rules required by President Obama’s landmark healthcare law, the proposed rule was drafted by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and sent to Pennsylvania Avenue on Thursday.

The White House’s Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) is moving quickly to issue the proposal, which will hit the Federal Register on Tuesday. That begins a 60-day comment period. CMS will consider all comments before finalizing the rule.

The 116-page proposed rule can be read here. The rule is considered economically significant, meaning it carries an economic impact of more than $100 million.

The measure would implement 85-percent “medical loss ratio” requirements on Medicare Advantage plans and the Medicare Prescription Drug Benefit Program. In other words, plans that deliver services under those plans must spend at least 85 percent of their premiums on “clinical services, prescription drugs, quality improving activities, and direct benefits to beneficiaries,” according to the proposal.

Overhead expenses and profits would be capped at 15 percent.

While those broad contours of the plan were set out in the Affordable Care Act, the healthcare industry has anxiously awaited the proposed language, which details nuances of the forthcoming regulations.

The rule would also institute penalties for those providers that fail to meet the caps requirements.

“If a plan sponsor fails to meet MLR requirements for more than 3 consecutive years, they will also be subject to enrollment sanctions and, after 5 consecutive years, to contract termination,” according to language in the proposal.

Since 2011, most general health insurers have been required to spend either 80 percent or 85 percent of their revenue on medical expenses, depending on their size. The rule expanding caps to Medicare Advantage - a program aimed at the elderly and disabled - and the Prescription Drug Benefit Program is set to take effect next January.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 0carepricecontrol; healthcare; medicareadvantage; obamacare; profit; profitmargin; ssdisability; whitehouse
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 last
To: Vince Ferrer; Grampa Dave; tubebender; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Jayster; NormsRevenge; BOBTHENAILER
"...availability."

Instead of Atlas Shrugged, it'll be your Doctor SHRUGGED and SHUNNED you!!!

41 posted on 02/16/2013 10:35:51 PM PST by SierraWasp (Mark Twain said: "It's easier to fool someone than to convince them they've been fooled!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

That is it, exactly.


42 posted on 02/16/2013 10:49:29 PM PST by ConservativeMind ("Humane" = "Don't pen up pets or eat meat, but allow infanticide, abortion, and euthanasia.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: PeevedPatriot; dennisw
"Imagine if law firms that handle malpractice claims had to function under terms similar to Obamacare. Imagine they're limited to 15% profit. And could only charge fees set by the feds. And were required to represent everyone who asked. And could only build their case around criteria set by boards of partisan appointees. Can you imagine the ruckus?"

Now that you mention it.....

In specific areas of the law, notably Social Security Disability, that is exactly what is done. The difference being that the set fee is 20% of the settlement for back pay of the disability claim.

This has resulted in a purposeful delay in the settlement of claims. The bureaucrats routinely deny valid claims out to two and three appeals just so that the claimants will seek legal counsel.

The lawyers, if they are forced into accepting a fresh case, will magically discover roadblocks that will drag the case out for a few years, increasing the amount of the settlement and not coincidentally, their fee.

Can I prove massive collusion to guarantee the lawyers increased fees? No.

Does it nonetheless exist? Youbetcha.
43 posted on 02/17/2013 12:51:19 AM PST by shibumi (Cover it with gas and set it on fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
This is just another form of "price controls." When you freeze or fix the price of something...

...you get LESS of it.

Prepare yourself, and your families, for SHORTAGES of anything that is so regulated.

God help us all.

Rent controls, price controls, etc., have never worked. Plenty of historical examples, foreign and domestic, prove that.

And the liberals never look at history nor economics. They simply refuse to learn.

They do love their social experimentation, don't they?

And when they fail--and their program will--they will find a scapegoat, usually some party with money or an interest.

Blame Big Pharma. Yeah, that will be the ticket.

44 posted on 02/17/2013 12:57:05 AM PST by sauron ("Truth is hate to those who hate Truth" --unknown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
The Kenyan way.

Yep. Just as he learned from his absentee alcoholic commie daddy and Dirty Old Man Frank Marshall Davis.

What it amounts to is, the gubmint will decide whether health care is a good business to be in. And, since the gubmint wants to be in the business itself, it naturally doesn't want other players screwing up the marketplace with unnecessary, wasteful and ill-advised choices for consumers. So, of course, there's no need for health care to be a profitable occupation ... let's just assign the docs a schedule of GS levels and leave it at that! We don't need no stinkin' Ben Carsons!

Which is fine and dandy, as long as you are healthy and not a US tax payer.

45 posted on 02/17/2013 1:09:36 AM PST by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
Dictating Destroying profit. The Kenyan way.

Fixed it.

This administration is destroying the medical business. The medical tax on 0bamacare is another example.

46 posted on 02/17/2013 4:48:01 AM PST by FatherofFive (Islam is evil and must be eradicated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

He will find companies and people who will “pay to play” pay the vig meanwhile everyone else will be moving to a more capitalistic climate. What do you call a government cap on profits in the private sector?


47 posted on 02/17/2013 4:51:22 AM PST by ronnie raygun (Lexington and Concord Americans experience thier first gun grab attempt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: YankeeReb

Yes, I’m reading it now. It’s freaky how parallel the book is to Zero’s governing style and our society. There’s even a “You didn’t build that” type quote in it. It is literally shocking how closely it parallels.


48 posted on 02/17/2013 5:01:14 AM PST by Hardastarboard (The Liberal ruling class hates me. The feeling is mutual.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

The goal is 80%. They will end up with 75%


49 posted on 02/17/2013 5:15:07 AM PST by bert ((K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 .....The fairest Deduction to be reduced is the Standard Deduction)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

One more thought.......

If the President kills Medicare Advantage, he is not going to survive the end of his term


50 posted on 02/17/2013 5:16:41 AM PST by bert ((K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 .....The fairest Deduction to be reduced is the Standard Deduction)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shibumi
So how about we cap the net worth increase of every public office holder at 15% over his net worth at the time of taking office?

And let’s do the same to the faceless bureaucrats who administer this crap.

Now THATS hope and change I could believe in!

51 posted on 02/17/2013 6:10:29 AM PST by C. Edmund Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Another anti-Constitutional, un-American dictate from the mad Kenyan.
Setting an allowable profit margin on private industry? Communism at its core, and just what one would expect from Zero and 0bamunists.
A pox on all their houses.


52 posted on 02/17/2013 7:34:52 AM PST by PubliusMM (RKBA; a matter of fact, not opinion. 01-20-2016; I pray we make it that long.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PubliusMM
Overhead expenses and profits would be capped at 15 percent. ==> No policy shall be issued that does not effectively guarantee a 15% return to cover both profits and expenses. Truly this will severely limit availability. And of course overhead expenses can be applied to any part of one's balance sheet. Can you say, "Hollywood Accounting?"
53 posted on 02/17/2013 8:30:27 AM PST by stocksthatgoup (Buy stocks that go up. If they don't go up, don't buy them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: MinuteGal
Good afternoon lovely lady. I hope you are doing better.

Oh, and don't get sick again. That's an order.

5.56mm

54 posted on 02/17/2013 10:38:05 AM PST by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: shibumi

Excellent point. Thanks for the added perspective.


55 posted on 02/17/2013 10:34:18 PM PST by PeevedPatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson