Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PeevedPatriot; dennisw
"Imagine if law firms that handle malpractice claims had to function under terms similar to Obamacare. Imagine they're limited to 15% profit. And could only charge fees set by the feds. And were required to represent everyone who asked. And could only build their case around criteria set by boards of partisan appointees. Can you imagine the ruckus?"

Now that you mention it.....

In specific areas of the law, notably Social Security Disability, that is exactly what is done. The difference being that the set fee is 20% of the settlement for back pay of the disability claim.

This has resulted in a purposeful delay in the settlement of claims. The bureaucrats routinely deny valid claims out to two and three appeals just so that the claimants will seek legal counsel.

The lawyers, if they are forced into accepting a fresh case, will magically discover roadblocks that will drag the case out for a few years, increasing the amount of the settlement and not coincidentally, their fee.

Can I prove massive collusion to guarantee the lawyers increased fees? No.

Does it nonetheless exist? Youbetcha.
43 posted on 02/17/2013 12:51:19 AM PST by shibumi (Cover it with gas and set it on fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: shibumi

Excellent point. Thanks for the added perspective.


55 posted on 02/17/2013 10:34:18 PM PST by PeevedPatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson