OR maybe these people could use the INSURANCE money they will get to pay for the expensive treatment they chose for a DOG.
No one denies someone the right to beg for bills they ran up...this REEKS of high-tech pan handling....aided and abetted by the media.
Frankly, I am tired of seeing the media draw attention to these so-called victims...there are hundreds of children abused, unborn babies murdered, and women beaten....instead, if the media isn’t burying its collective noses into Obama’s backside, they’re trolling for “victims” who have met up with unremarkable accidents.
SoFloFreeper: “OR maybe these people could use the INSURANCE money they will get to pay for the expensive treatment they chose for a DOG.”
Well, it’s their choice how to pay for the dog. It’s your choice on whether or not to help them. Don’t like it? Don’t donate. It’s really as simple as that.
BTW, I know there is no shortage of people in need. Like you mentioned, there are battered women, hungry children, etc. You’re free to donate as much as you want to whoever you want or donate nothing at all. So what if the media is trolling for victims. If you own a media company, you can tell it what charities you want publicized.
I don’t know why the concepts of voluntary charity and the right of people to do what they want with their private property are so radical.