Sandy Hook DA cites 'potential suspects,' fears witness safety

http://digitaljournal.com ^ | February 5, 2013 | By Ralph Lopez

[ExxonPatrolUs]

Connecticut State's Attorney Stephen Sedensky has argued that unsealing warrants in the Sandy Hook case might "seriously jeopardize" the investigation by disclosing information known only to other "potential suspects." Sedensky said that unsealing the warrants would also: ""identify persons cooperating with the investigation, thus possibly jeopardizing their personal safety and well-being." "

[Uncle Chip]

Pleidians ehhhh??? I think we have some here.

[CharlesWayneCT]

Hey, to be fair, Prole just came in, and we are all pretty much trying to ignore him. I can't even figure out a good way to make fun of those rants. I mean, how can you refute such an ironclad argument:

Well, I guess you could point out that there are actual dead children, whose actual dead bodies were carried out of the school by actual people, and then examined by an actual medical examiner, and then interred by an actual funeral director, and buried in an actual grave, while these "lying liars who lie" stood by.

I'm sure that each of the liars who lost a child WISH they were lying about their children being dead.

On the other hand, most of us aren't obsessing over the grief patterns of the parents of 6-year-olds horribly killed in a senseless act of violence. SO long as they aren't trying to take rights away, I don't even CARE if they aren't perfectly truthful when they speak of their relationship with their kids, or their feelings.

The only purpose to bring up this kind or ridiculous argument is to try to assert that there were not actual dead kids. Once you are forced to accept the basic, undeniable FACT of dead children, it really makes NO DIFFERENCE at all whether Crazy Gene is looking for a moment of fame, or some parent or another can't cry on demand, or has a rose-colored view of their life that wouldn't stand up to scrutiny.

But sadly, some people seem to think that is all that matters.

[CharlesWayneCT]

Unless your argument is that the toxic chemicals formed a sentient being which rose up, went to the local walmart, bought a gun, and wandered into the school and shot the kids while Adam watched, and then flushed themselves down the drain, nobody I imagine really CARES about the chemicals in the dirt one way or another.

If there are chemicals in the town, I feel sorry for those who have to deal with it. It didn’t kill the kids. And even if it contributed to the mental instability of Adam, it didn’t make Adam kill the kids.

[CharlesWayneCT]

I hadn’t even THOUGHT of that.

What if the car was like Christine? Then maybe the car drove itself to the school, and threw open it’s own doors, and spit out all the clothing.

Or maybe Adam was just cleaning his car that day, and he wanted a quiet place to do it, so he drove to that parking lot, and opened all the doors, and was getting everything out so he could vacuum. But the mercury seeped up, got into his brain, and made him decide to kill the kids instead.

[CharlesWayneCT]

How do they know that this particular car is the shooter’s car?

[CharlesWayneCT]

It flew in like the Batmobile

No wait, I understand now. And it all revolves around the nuns. Well not "nuns". Just ONE nun. One Very Special Nun:

[Uncle Chip]

Do you have that in black??? If so then we have another mystery solved.

[CharlesWayneCT]

No, because the Flying Nun was a symbol of all that was good and right, and therefore had to be white, because that was before we understood racism.

I really thought I could find a group of “flying nuns”, like a troop that did parajumping like the flying elvises, but I got bored after 5 seconds and just grabbed the Flying Nun.

[saleman]

Ok, let's see. You say that the shotgun referenced was the shotgun in the trunk. On another thread a while back when I asked “where are the handguns” you said the multiple weapons were the handguns. And if I remember correctly, the officer was in the school at the time and reporting on weapons he see’s at the time. In the school. Cause I thought the shotgun could have caused the deaths. So now, the shotgun referenced was the one in the trunk? So this one guy is inventorying the guns used in the shooting and he happens to inventory the shotgun in the trunk, which wasn't found until they removed it from the trunk at night? After they got a search warrent? The warrents they are now withholding? Also the warrents they are withholding cause they had to get a warrent to find out that the mother was dead? So, there was no shotgun in the school? The handguns are the multiple guns. The mother wasn't found until after a warrent was issued for her home. And the car wasn't searched until after a warrent was issued.

OK. Got it.

[saleman]

“So then how did they know about the shotgun at 9:55:25 on the police scanner???

BTW. At 9:55 if I remember what was posted correctly, Officer said “one rifle and a shotgun” I thought the rifle was in the school. As we all saw, just a shotgun in the trunk right? Actually “Multiple weapons. One rifle and a shotgun.” Which, according to some meant 4 handguns. Or else, where are the handguns? "So then how did they know about the shotgun at 9:55:25 on the police scanner???" I don't know. You tell me. I thought the shotgun was among the multiple weapons referenced. You know. along with the rifle. Which had to be inside cause it wasn't in the trunk. Right?

[saleman]

“So then how did they know about the shotgun at 9:55:25 on the police scanner???

BTW. At 9:55 if I remember what was posted correctly, Officer said “one rifle and a shotgun” I thought the rifle was in the school. As we all saw, just a shotgun in the trunk right? Actually “Multiple weapons. One rifle and a shotgun.” Which, according to some meant 4 handguns. Or else, where are the handguns? "So then how did they know about the shotgun at 9:55:25 on the police scanner???" I don't know. You tell me. I thought the shotgun was among the multiple weapons referenced. You know. along with the rifle. Which had to be inside cause it wasn't in the trunk. Right?

[saleman]

If it’s not too much trouble, could you kindly get an accounting for the weapons at the scene. I’d try but I have a job and all and the only place I get my info is from you and maybe one other.

I am off tomorrow but I’m going fishing and doing a lot of other things around the house.

[Uncle Chip]

STATE POLICE IDENTIFY WEAPONS USED IN SANDY HOOK

http://www.ct.gov/despp/cwp/view.asp?Q=517284&A=4226

State Police: All 26 Newtown victims shot with the Bushmaster

http://www.ctpost.com/newtownshooting/article/State-Police-All-26-Newtown-victims-shot-with-4220548.php

[saleman]

No, sorry if I didn't make myself clear. All the weapons at the scene. You know, shotguns, rifles, handguns, etc. Just the usual suspects. There were at least 4 handguns right? Maybe? Maybe not. I coulda read the accounts wrong. Or maybe it was just reported wrong. Or maybe I'm just making it up. Or maybe someone else is just making it up. Or, maybe the cops are just making it up. Or maybe nobody actually knows, or maybe someone knows and just doesn't want to tell anybody. Or, maybe it's all clear to someone but they are just trying to make a conspiracy theory out of it.

It's kinda a conundrum, isn't it?

[saleman]

“State Police: All 26 Newtown victims shot with the Bushmaster”

Oh, heck. I already knew that. I got a gen-u-wine e-mail from H. Wayne Carver a couple of weeks ago, personally telling me that.

Really.

[PghBaldy]

One of the things that bugged me about OKC was the Feds kept thousands of docs, then “found” them after McVeigh was convicted, then killed him. Absolutely criminal behavior on the part of Clinton & Bush Administrations. In cases of such extreme concern for the country as a whole, things should be done by the book. they weren’t. In any of the cases mentioned as a matter of fact, and I tend to err on the side of giving the benefit to the govt, but LBJ-Obama (and POTUSes in between) screwed up big time.

[Candor7]

....Or Not

[Uncle Chip]

I already knew that.

Then why are you asking for it? again?

[Uncle Chip]

Since you asked:

Sandy Hook Timeline deciphered from police dispatch [developing]:

9:35 The first shots are fired; followed by 911 calls to the police.
9:36 Police are dispatched to the school.
9:36:35 An individual reports broken glass window at the front door and doesn’t know why it’s broken.
9:37:15 Same individual still on the phone with dispatch reports shots continuing from inside the school.
9:37:45~ The 10 kids in Soto’s room make a break for it.
9:38:15+ First officer arrives and reports that shooting had stopped. Other officers begin arriving on the scene. Search the vehicle? and establish a perimeter.
9:39+ The individual [who was on phone with dispatch?] is chased into the woods and taken him into custody. Other officers begin entering the school from front and back.
9:40 Police find the bodies of the principal and psychologist; request two ambulances.
9:40~ Two mothers spot the kids running toward the firehouse on their way up to the school.
9:42~ The two mothers are at the front door of the school, notice the quiet, the broken glass, the 4 doors of Lanza’s car open, black sweatshirts on the ground.
9:46 Shooter fires final shots and kills himself.
9:55:25: Police advise of multiple weapons, one rifle and a shotgun.
10:30 Police walk “4 students that had left the school previously” [Rosen’s house?] to the fire station.

[Boogieman]

“I see through their lies, as I see through their false emotions.”

You know, we have a word for that. It’s called “delusional”.