Posted on 02/06/2013 11:30:20 AM PST by ExxonPatrolUs
Connecticut State's Attorney Stephen Sedensky has argued that unsealing warrants in the Sandy Hook case might "seriously jeopardize" the investigation by disclosing information known only to other "potential suspects." Sedensky said that unsealing the warrants would also: ""identify persons cooperating with the investigation, thus possibly jeopardizing their personal safety and well-being." "
(Excerpt) Read more at digitaljournal.com ...
Hey Jack,
This is a fact. The Connecticut DA’s Office thinks that Lanza did not act alone.
“The statement by the CT prosecutor’s office is the first indication from state authorities that Adam Lanza may have not acted alone. The statement was made in support of a motion to continue the seal on the results of five search warrants for 90 more days.”
Whoa! Do you suppose it was the Islamofascists? Was it a group of home grown Obama inspired anarchists taking advantage of Lanza? I would love to know the prosecutor’s theory.
Maybe this will clue you in
Although it does claim that a paramedic came outside and told the Firechief that no surivors left inside. Firechief is not the one that made that determination.
tax fraud???
Heslin’s friend
Botti was charged with trying to bribe an official over a land deal and mail fraud.
You're right -- I can't -- and of course aliens do like to eat maize and corn tortillas.
Yes, I can see your point.
If there are other suspects that are involved that the police do not want to tip off by releasing news of the investigation, that would make sense.
If there are other suspects that were involved, would they not be considered dangerous and a potential hazard to the public at large?
Should not APBs be posted attempting to find the whereabouts of the other perpetrators?
Here now comes the but(t)...
But, if Adam did act on his own with no confederates, or other conspirators, then why the delay in issuing a report?
The one undeniable transformative change that Obama has brought this country with the completion of his first term is the politicization of the Just-Us department. What should be of concern to every American is this rush to pass legislation on the emotion of the Sandy Hook killings.
Once again, the founders of this nation understood that the nation should not swing back and forth on the emotion of the moment but rather that whatever legislation is produced is the result of a deliberate and temperate process.
Is there no report in an effort to bolster this rush to legislation? That should be the concern of every American.
Your own link answers the question.
The first on the scene were nine Newtown officers, divided into three teams of three, including the police chief. They were the first, after the shooter, to force their way into the school, via the front lobby and the rear door.
Compared to intelligent posts about crop circles. ROTFLMAO
The computer forensics take a long time. Remember he smashed up his hard drive.
IF there was a conspiracy or some internet idjit that encouraged this kid in his destructive delusions they need to be held to account.
Let's give LEO the time and space to make sure.
Now, all we get is people throwing poo at the wall to see if it sticks.
What should be of concern to every American is this rush to pass legislation on the emotion of the Sandy Hook killings.I agree with you. I don't know what to believe or not to believe about Sandy Hook, but I do know that our leader doesn't always tell the truth. And he has no remorse whatsoever concerning the bloodshed of holy innocents either, that's for sure.
Not necessarily. And as for picking them up right away, why? To tip them off that you are building a case against them?
Not necessarily. And as for picking them up right away, why? To tip them off that you are building a case against them?
Not necessarily. And as for picking them up right away, why? To tip them off that you are building a case against them?
Not necessarily. And as for picking them up right away, why? To tip them off that you are building a case against them?
Not necessarily. And as for picking them up right away, why? To tip them off that you are building a case against them?
Not necessarily. And as for picking them up right away, why? To tip them off that you are building a case against them?
Not necessarily. And as for picking them up right away, why? To tip them off that you are building a case against them?
Ping to a thread that you might find interesting.
Wow! 7 duplicate posts, I have never been able to do that many!
‘And as for picking them up right away, why? ‘
If they were onboard with shooting up an elementary school, I would consider them a threat to the general public at large.
If they are people involved in the gun business, then this investigation has little to do with the actual crime in Sandy Hook.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.