Posted on 02/02/2013 9:30:30 AM PST by bray
Yours, if I am following you correctly, is as I should have guessed from something musical.
Mine, well I will only say before I leave for the nite is “So Long and Thanks for all the Fish”. I will check back in for any responses in the morning.
Ok, I checked back before I went. The song has hints of dylan. My most memorable quote from him isn’t from a song. He was doing an interview once and he told the interviewer that we (mankind) are just spirit surrounded by skin. If anyone can help me out with re-parsing tacticalogic using a ‘1’ fill me in, I may not sleep all night trying to figure it out.
A quote by Dylan or Cohen ?
As for the re-parsing, It is a distinction without a difference.
The quote was from Dylan. Sorry, it’s to late I can’t differenciate any distinctions.
‘It has withstood evaluation and attack for 150 years.”
No it hasn’t, please show development to Cambrian stage life...where is the evolution? Even Darwin recognized that his theory did not hold water unless his assumption of finding evidence of evolution to the Cambrian stage held true. It has been 150 years and to date there is no evidence of evolution to that point.
“Genesis posits that it all began with a big bang.”
Really? Chapter and verse, please.
It is called the creation fool...read the bible fully but for how the world was truly created...as well as man, read Genesis. Read the whole book.
You’re calling me a fool, because I don’t remember Genesis talking about a “Big Bang”? I know God created the universe. And I know that name calling is infantile.
You are correct, please accept my apology.
Many, including me, believe that what scientists have discovered when they identified the probable creation of mass and energy which they describe as the Big Bang Theory is of course when God actually created the universe. Below are the verses which describe that creation:
1 In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. 2 Now the earth was formless and empty, darkness was over the surface of the deep, and the Spirit of God was hovering over the waters.
3 And God said, “Let there be light,” and there was light. 4 God saw that the light was good, and he separated the light from the darkness. 5 God called the light “day,” and the darkness he called “night.” And there was evening, and there was morning—the first day.
Why start with the Cambrian? Here’s a random sample of papers dealing with biological evolution in the Pre-Cambrian. After you get through these, get back to me and I’ll post some more...
http://jgs.geoscienceworld.org/content/149/4/607.short
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v264/n5587/abs/264620a0.html
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2FBF00927018?LI=true
http://www.intl-geology.geoscienceworld.org/content/31/1/27.short
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0012160602907141
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2FBF01808177?LI=true
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0031018204005905
http://www.bioone.org/doi/abs/10.2517/prpsj.7.43
http://www.osti.gov/energycitations/product.biblio.jsp?osti_id=6298588
Answer his question? Put away the smoke and mirrors and answer the question you were axed!
Nice try Head Priest.
First of all, the word you are struggling with is “asked”, not “axed”. You’d think that a guy pretending to be a writer would know better, but I guess not. As far answering his question, I have provided him with more than he can simply explain away. No “smoke and mirrors”, just good old fashioned science.
Who axed you for a writing lesson? Here is a virtual dollar so you can go buy a virtual sense of humor.
No you never answered his question at all. Now answer it or get lost with your cheap thug magic tricks. This is not my first rodeo with you libs.
So you didn’t even bother to look at the papers I’ve posted? Color me shocked. If you’re going to go to the rodeo, you’d better learn how to get on a horse.
I always read it as "tactical logic" with the two Ls combined.
Oh, you thought I cared what you think and your same old tired websites. He axed the question not me.
I have long quit caring what you think, you are just another sellout for evolution. You can’t afford to look at the gaps in the theory since your entire life and livelihood is from selling out to a lie.
They are nothing more than justification for accepting a fraud.
.
That was the intent. I think I’m having something of a protocol mismatch on this thread with it though. It doesn’t interface well with tactical emotion.
By George that must be the way it’s read.
Um, the journal Nature isn’t exactly a “tired old website”. Do you have any concept at all about the scientific method or peer review? It is clear to me that your education has been woefully inadequate, but it’s never too late to learn.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.