[reaganator]

I know Senator Rand Paul asked her about the cause of the terrorist attack in which she promptly feigned outrage, but did anyone ask her, “Who directed you and other officials to promote a lie?”

[VAFreedom]

does it even matter at this point?

/s

[napscoordinator]

I personally don’t think the Republicans did a good job during this hearing. Republicans always seem to miss opportunities and then when they think about it afterwards, they are always like, “Oh yeah, we should have asked that question.” Everyone says Hillary dodged questions which is true, but who let her??????

[fatnotlazy]

I didn't watch the hearings in their entirety, but it looked to me like a Hillary slobberfest. The panel spent a lot of time jabbering about her busy schedule, how hard she works and her recent illness. It appeared that she was reading a lot from a prepared text (was she given the questions ahead of time?) and when asked some serious questions, she reacted with indignation instead of giving any real answers.

The hearings were a waste of time and taxpayer dollars. Meanwhile, 4 Americans are dead and it seems no one has the balls to find out the truth and punish the wrongdoers.

[LibertarianLiz]

Actually, I have always had a simple question which has never been answered. "Who said no?"

These people were requesting better security for a long time; then, while under attack were begging for help. So, when they were begging for help, who said "no"?

Now, I believe it was the President who said no; but, Hillary being Hillary, she "stands by her man" and takes the dive. Which, is what she did during her testimony. Probably for a (soft) promise of Obama endorsing her Presidential run. I'm betting she will be disappointed in him.