They might as well have gotten their marching orders from the White House tonight.
“Krauthammer even went so far as to say, of course the President’s children should be protected because of who the President is and out kids don’t need that type of protection.” To make a statement like that is beyond repugnant! To insinuate that the life of any child is more or less important because of who the parent is,is ridiculous.
Does the parent living in the ghetto grieve over the loss of a child any less than the wealthiest person? Krauthammer fell into the liberal attitude that some are more important or valuable than others.
I for one that all children deserve the same protection and opportunities. So if these morons don’t believe our children should be protected by armed security as the elite, if they don’t agree then it should be required that their children go public schools without protection!
Fox = Murdoch = not to be trusted on the 2A issue.
Let's add district attorneys, high-profile trial witnesses, athletes playing in high stakes games, where kidnapping is a real possibility.
There are all sorts of "average people" who could find themselves in situations where they could be extorted with threats of violence.
-PJ
Do any of the 3 panelists have kids currently attending public schools?
Just heard Bill O'Reilly's opening discussion with U.S. Sen. Marco Rubio. BoR said he is for ...
1. ban on "military-style assault rifles" - The asshat still doesn't understand the difference between an automatic rifle and a semi-automatic rifle.
2. registration of all firearms - He claimed the progressive left believes this will reduce crime. The asshat is oblivious to the threat of federal confiscation.
3. along with registration, fingerprint all gun owners.
BoR is truly a useful idiot and carrying water for the 5th Column of which he is a leading figure. More and more Freepers see him for the lout he really is.
The criminal mind seeks soft targets. Liberals create soft targets. Are soft targets created on purpose? The argument could be made that indeed soft targets are created for the sole purpose of keeping the police busy, criminal attorneys busy, judges busy, the system busy, and the media busy with it bleeding so it is leading. These people have to eat too. It is similar to a make work type of stimulus package. The thing which makes it different is it is supposedly not a bailout because the bailout is reserved for the criminal, which employs more people. People die, and the system and media make money. We must accept this, must we not?
I’m really confused, if people pick up their kids after school and a police officer is parked out front, do the parents say “What’s that SOB doing here?”
Why is anyone even arguing against police protection?
Obama is ridiculing the NRA suggestion just because it was made by the NRA.
I seem to remember a similar response by rinos of the day when Wayne Lapierre confronted Billy ‘the pervert’ Clinton way back in the 90’s.
Sour Krauthammer was virulently anti-Palin. He showed who he really is during that time.
the NRA ad was perfect and true and Fox boys better get with it or their audience will desert them.
They are not RINOs.
The problem with that crowd is that none of them are firearm owners and not one of them understands the fact that Sidwell Friends school has armed guards.....not for the President’s children, but for all the students of elite Washingtonians.
The President’s children get an additional layer of protection from the Secret Service.
FReepers know this story. Those on Fox do not.
That is why they saw the ad as “out of bounds” while the rest of us love it.
I thought the ad was spot on and the pundits were way off. If Bammy wants to surround himself with human shields the way all dictators do, then all’s fair as far as I’m concerned.
We’re gonna have to realize we have to fight fire with fire with this guy. The media won’t like it and that’s fine. The way the WH reacted tells me the NRA hit a nerve.
Keep hitting.
They will defend themselves by saying that the ad was using class warfare as the basis of its appeal. I heard the ad. It was brilliant BECAUSE it used Obama’s class warfare argument.
The NRA is definitely appealing to conservative gun owners, but it’s also trying to tap into those self-defense democrats and independents who too often are Limbaugh’s “low information voters”.
So, that ad in particular would appeal to the masses, and that is what makes it brilliant.
And that is why the liberal media is appalled and why the Mitt Media is tut-tutting.
“They might as well have gotten their marching orders from the White House tonight.”
Rupert Murdoch is pleased I am sure (considering his gun grabbing ideology).
I am thinking they will be purging Hannity soon because of his adamant support of the Second Amendment. His show is the only one I watch on Fox now (unless Beckel or Williams is on it and then I turn off Fox). Hannity’s radio show today was excellent.
this is why the elitist on our side have to go ocne and for all, they fought Newt, they fought Sarah and they fight anyone who fights the left because they think we should act civil, be nice, try and get along.
Well north east , DC elitists, that time has gone to hell with you and the socialists.
Every frigging time our side starts to take the left on these idiots and the likes of Peggy Noonan come on and put our side down whilst the socialists laugh their little pee wees off
Someone needs to point out to these knuckleheads that one of the key ideas of Americanism was that we did not bow to kings, that the citizen was the equal of his representatives all the way up to and including the President.
Having special laws for the governmental elite is a dangerous precedent and a vast step backwards for the idea of America.
Someone needs to point out to these knuckleheads that one of the key ideas of Americanism was that we did not bow to kings, that the citizen was the equal of his representatives all the way up to and including the President.
Having special laws for the governmental elite is a dangerous precedent and a vast step backwards for the idea of America.
The Obamamites love trotting out the kids when they think it will score points. Then when someone calls them on it, they act appalled, outraged, high dudgeon, et cetera and so forth and so on.
The MSM then carries their water, the GOP-e’rs recant, confess, `mea culpa!’ (sob), profound apologies, Boner has a good cry—rinse, repeat.
The GOP-e is the left’s straightman, the Generals to their Globetrotters vaudeville act. Next time they need help, I’ll gladly hit them with a stream from a seltzer bottle.
The elite are fairly consistent. I remember Juan a couple of weeks ago talking to Sean Hannity. When Sean mentioned he had a CCP, Juan immediately stated that he understood why a man with Sean’s public persona would need to have arms.
Kinda like in the 90’s when one of Ted Kennedy’s body guards was thrown off a plane for carrying a weapon, the libs all chimed in that any one of Teddy’s persona should have armed body guards but no one else should have.
IOW, If you’re an elite, then you can be protected but if you’re just a commoner, then you don’t count