Skip to comments.
Meese: Obama Risks Impeachment If He uses Executive Order for Gun Control
NewsMax ^
| January 14, 2013
| Todd Beamon and Kathleen Walter
Posted on 01/15/2013 7:08:50 AM PST by paratrooper82
Former U.S. Attorney General Edwin Meese III declared in an exclusive Newsmax TV interview that President Barack Obama could easily be impeached if he bypassed Congress and enacted gun-control legislation by executive order.
(Excerpt) Read more at newsmax.com ...
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Front Page News
KEYWORDS: arrest; banglist; bhofascism; constitution; democrats; guncontrol; impeachment; ineligible; obama; secondamendment; tyranny
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-75 last
To: madison10
Screw impeachment. He needs imprisonment.
61
posted on
01/15/2013 9:33:14 AM PST
by
crosshairs
(They are only assault weapons in the hands of tyrannical governments and criminals. Ban both.)
To: 4everontheRight
“I believe O’s plan is to bring this nation to civil war.”
Bingo! We have a winner. Guns are the line in the sand in this country. Millions of people didn’t buy weapons in the past 4 years to turn around and register and/or turn them back in. Not gonna happen. If The Kenyan comes after the guns he is toast.
62
posted on
01/15/2013 9:46:01 AM PST
by
Georgia Girl 2
(The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
To: ponygirl
Nobody has seriously tried yet, so we don’t know if that line has been crossed.
63
posted on
01/15/2013 10:03:15 AM PST
by
DBrow
To: Georgia Girl 2
My Guess it won’t be the One who comes for guns, just his minions. He won’t get his hands dirty, it will be some smuck that will be tasked with coming for the guns.
To: madison10
The House would impeach 0dumb0...but the Senate would never convict him, just like they never convicted Bubba Clinton after his lying & obstruction of justice. And now the bastard Clinton is considered a "statesman" of his socialist party.
The only small consolation in a House impeachment of 0dumb0 is that this would mightly hurt & offend his extremely vain & narcissistic persona.
To: madison10
That’s nice, but who is going to ACTUALLY impeach him?!Even if it couldn't be brought to proper fruition, putting out articles of impeachment might have an educational effect and help to curb the treachery that is brewing.
66
posted on
01/15/2013 10:41:44 AM PST
by
trebb
(Allies no longer trust us. Enemies no longer fear us.)
To: madison10
Big Deal. Even if the House passes articles of impeachment and there is a trial, how many democrat senators will vote to convict and remove him. Even if EVERY GOP senator voted to convict and remove (doubtful at best) you would still need enough demos to get to 67 votes. So which 20 democrat senators do you think would even consider voting to remove?
To: madison10
They wont even ask him to prove his citizenship!
68
posted on
01/15/2013 10:59:19 AM PST
by
rawcatslyentist
("Behold, I am against you, O arrogant one," Jeremiah 50:31)
To: madison10
That’s nice, but who is going to ACTUALLY impeach him?!Nobody will do anything to stop him.
Obama and Democrats to Republicans: "LOL!"
69
posted on
01/15/2013 11:23:15 AM PST
by
wastedyears
(My life mostly completely turned around in a few weeks. Now to leave NY...)
To: madison10
To: madison10
Exactly. The GOP is completely gutless and won’t do a thing to thwart His Excellency...
71
posted on
01/15/2013 11:27:18 AM PST
by
Wyatt's Torch
(I can explain it to you. I can't understand it for you.)
To: madison10
Congress is waaay too wimpy to impeach, and the Senate would not convict anyway.
Note to my congressman and senator: PLEASE, make a liar out of me!
72
posted on
01/15/2013 11:29:10 AM PST
by
JimRed
(Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed &water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS, NOW & FOREVER!)
To: DBrow
At some point in this process he will have amassed so much power that Congress and the Courts can no longer contain him.Besides that, how many battalions do congress and the courts command? Can they call in blue helmeted assistance?
How many of our professional military will obey unlawful orders, or even recognize that the orders are not lawful?
73
posted on
01/15/2013 12:45:17 PM PST
by
JimRed
(Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed &water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS, NOW & FOREVER!)
To: ConchKarl
My Guess it won’t be the One who comes for guns, just his minions. He won’t get his hands dirty, it will be some smuck that will be tasked with coming for the guns.When it starts, our response should first be against those GIVING THE ORDERS. Shoot the schmuck in self defense if you have no alternative, but hunt down and terminate his supervisor and the guy who gave the supervisor his orders.
74
posted on
01/15/2013 12:58:25 PM PST
by
JimRed
(Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed &water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS, NOW & FOREVER!)
To: Sequoyah101
100 thousand Øbozo jackbooted stormtroopers against 100 MILLION armed citizens. Not bad odds...
75
posted on
01/15/2013 8:00:47 PM PST
by
TXnMA
("Allah": Satan's current alias... "Barack": Allah's current ally...)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-75 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson