Skip to comments.
Navy admits standard-issue uniform is highly flammable and will melt onto skin
UK Daily Mail ^
| 10 January 2013
| By Beth Stebner
Posted on 01/11/2013 6:04:23 AM PST by US Navy Vet
The U.S. Navys standard-issue blue digitized camouflage fatigues are highly flammable and will burn robustly until complete consumption, a report revealed last month. The findings show that the digital-print camo, which is made from 50 percent cotton and 50 percent nylon, will drip as it burns, causing potentially hazardous burn injuries. But the Navys top spokesman said that the government organization is aware of the report findings, and added that sailors had asked for a fade-resistant uniform that was also comfortable.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government
KEYWORDS: military; uniform; usnavy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-69 next last
To: US Navy Vet
"...50 percent cotton and 50 percent nylon..." Un-Be_Lievable. Stunning. I am a dope when it comes to clothing, but even I know you don't use standard issue clothing with that blend in an environment where you may have to deal with fires.
Stunning.
21
posted on
01/11/2013 6:34:21 AM PST
by
rlmorel
(1793 French Jacobins and 2012 American Liberals have a lot in common.)
To: BipolarBob
“Nancy Pelosis husband was in the fabric stock market at the time and needed a few quick million.”
Yep. I was just thinking those uniforms came from someone connected to the CriminalIn Chief.
22
posted on
01/11/2013 6:35:01 AM PST
by
freeangel
( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like it)
To: KC_Lion
“Good Job Navy, Good Job.”
Well, they are “A Global Force for Good.” So, they have that going for them.
23
posted on
01/11/2013 6:35:52 AM PST
by
brownsfan
(Behold, the power of government cheese.)
To: rlmorel
When I was in the Navy (long ago) the standard issue dungarees were a nylon blend. When wet and tied at the ankles they would hold air and could be used as a floatation device. They were quite stiff, would melt if too hot. Most chose to wear the optional cotton dungarees instead.
24
posted on
01/11/2013 6:38:29 AM PST
by
BillGunn
(Bill Gunn for Congress district one rep. Massachusetts)
To: tgusa
When I was in during the late 80s we were wearing the chambray shirts with iron transferred rank insignia, over a white tee shirt, with denim pants, web belt, black socks. and mid-cut leather boots called boondockers, though I sprung for some steel toed Danners. We either wore the "dixie cup" or the command ball cap.
They weren't the sharpest working uniform ever made, but they were a throwback to the uniform worn since WW2 and represented a tradition all of its own that way. The "aquaflage" represents an organization playing "me too" on BDU style uniforms. For a more durable working uniform, the Navy should just make the navy blue coveralls we all wore for dirty work the standard shipboard uniform, maybe put some better cargo pockets on them. If a squid is doing work among the ground pounders, just adopt the Marines' MARPAT, but with a Navy symbology repeating in the fabric rather than the globe and anchor theme in the USMC version.
To: rlmorel
When I was in the Navy (long ago) the standard issue dungarees were a nylon blend. When wet and tied at the ankles they would hold air and could be used as a floatation device. They were quite stiff, would melt if too hot. Most chose to wear the optional cotton dungarees instead.
26
posted on
01/11/2013 6:39:37 AM PST
by
BillGunn
(Bill Gunn for Congress district one rep. Massachusetts)
To: US Navy Vet
One of my dearest friends (now deceased) was on the USS Forrestal during that horrific episode ... the “Forrest fire” as it is called. Maybe the Navy has forgotten about that with their highly flammable, melting uniforms. Burns are horrific - pain, suffering, disfiguring damage and long difficult recovery, if you survive. Shame on the Navy.
27
posted on
01/11/2013 6:40:20 AM PST
by
MissMagnolia
(You see, truth always resides wherever brave men still have ammunition. I pick truth. (John Ransom))
To: US Navy Vet
But this can't be; the Navy specifically stated that these uniforms met all fire safety standards when they were announced in 2009. Surely fire safety standards do not include ‘igniting like a human torch when exposed to fire.’
Ahh, well, at least there was money left over to make a couple patrol boats for three billion dollars.
28
posted on
01/11/2013 6:43:35 AM PST
by
kingu
(Everything starts with slashing the size and scope of the federal government.)
To: US Navy Vet
Our flight suits in the USAF back in the 50’s and 60’s were also very flammable and tended to melt and stick to ones skin. I don’t know about today’s green bags but I wouldn’t be surprised.
29
posted on
01/11/2013 6:43:44 AM PST
by
Don Corleone
("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
To: US Navy Vet
added that sailors had asked for a fade-resistant uniform that was also comfortable. How stupid is this?
One hazard you can be sure of in the service is fire.
I still remember my crew chief tearing me a new one the first time I wore a polyester polo shirt under my flight suit.
Cotton only!
Aye, Aye!
30
posted on
01/11/2013 6:44:36 AM PST
by
grobdriver
(Sic semper tyrannis!)
To: US Navy Vet
When in the Navy and on fire, just jump in the ocean.
There. My work here is done.
To: martin_fierro
Being a welder and plumber I always wore cotton and taught so from day one. And that was 35 years ago. This is nothing new.
To: US Navy Vet
It’s great camo...if you fell over the side, no one would ever see you and if you’re on land, you stand out like a sore thumb.
33
posted on
01/11/2013 6:54:04 AM PST
by
stuartcr
("I upraded my moral compass to a GPS, to keep up with the times.")
To: paterfamilias
No but cotton fades quickly. just don’t play with matches everything will be Otay.
34
posted on
01/11/2013 6:54:48 AM PST
by
Gasshog
(Welcome to the United States of Stupidos!)
To: Hardraade
35
posted on
01/11/2013 6:55:01 AM PST
by
moose07
(the truth will out ,one day. The Edge of the world is Square and water pours over it!)
To: US Navy Vet
Get rid of them. They’re ugly as Hell anyway.
To: oh8eleven
‘cause all the other guys have their camo
37
posted on
01/11/2013 6:55:39 AM PST
by
stuartcr
("I upraded my moral compass to a GPS, to keep up with the times.")
To: paterfamilias
No, they were great, especially the bells
38
posted on
01/11/2013 6:56:57 AM PST
by
stuartcr
("I upraded my moral compass to a GPS, to keep up with the times.")
To: US Navy Vet
“The Navy’s standard-issue blue camouflage uniforms are highly flammable and will melt onto the skin when burning, a recent Navy test revealed.
A second revelation: This comes as no surprise to the Navy.
“We knew when we designed this uniform that it wasn’t flame-resistant,” said Rear Adm. John Kirby, the Navy’s top spokesman.”
What a great guy to have leading you...
39
posted on
01/11/2013 6:57:02 AM PST
by
ltc8k6
To: Don Corleone; US Navy Vet
40
posted on
01/11/2013 6:58:11 AM PST
by
Mr Rogers
(America is becoming California, and California is becoming Detroit. Detroit is already hell.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-69 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson