1 posted on
01/09/2013 5:14:04 AM PST by
Kaslin
To: Kaslin
Because Obie is a punk? A street thug?
Just a guess...
2 posted on
01/09/2013 5:16:37 AM PST by
gov_bean_ counter
(Hope and Change has become Attack and Obfuscate.)
To: Kaslin
"The interesting question is, why? Why waste the political capital?"
Because he can't "waste" political capital. His supporters, especially in the media, will support anything he does. Anything. And his detractors won't. He knows that so he'll whatever he wants at any given time. There's no downside.
To: Kaslin
Obama’s first choice was the Blind Sheik, who
refused to change parties for Obama.
4 posted on
01/09/2013 5:18:17 AM PST by
Diogenesis
(Vi veri veniversum vivus vici)
To: Kaslin
Hagel is an antisemite. That’s the be all and end all for Obama.
5 posted on
01/09/2013 5:21:09 AM PST by
Hardraade
(http://junipersec.wordpress.com (Vendetta))
To: Kaslin
nobama to the Republicans: Here, eat this!
6 posted on
01/09/2013 5:24:27 AM PST by
upchuck
(America's at an awkward stage. Too late to work within the system, too early to shoot the bastards.)
To: Kaslin
Well, petty tyrants make petty decisions.
8 posted on
01/09/2013 5:29:30 AM PST by
Marathoner
(Our forefathers would be shooting by now.)
To: Kaslin
Hagel is the bone tossed over the junkyard fence to occupy the dogs while Obama picks the lock to gain entry.
Watch for what he does while the stoopid Republicans are grandstanding the nomination.
12 posted on
01/09/2013 5:33:49 AM PST by
Aevery_Freeman
(The trouble with the "masses" is that they never achieve the "m")
To: Kaslin
hitlery was the worst SOS — dumb as the day is long.
This guy is just equally bad.
To: Kaslin
It could have been worse..he could have nominated the lady mentioned in the piece as the first female secretary to show how inclusive his administration is...
Personally I’ll take a liberal Republican who was a grunt and decorated combat veteran over just about anyone else O would have nominated...
To: Kaslin
Hagel wast the Mullah’s pick
18 posted on
01/09/2013 5:43:32 AM PST by
SMARTY
("The man who has no inner-life is a slave to his surroundings. "Henri Frederic Amiel)
To: Kaslin
Hagel wast the Mullah’s pick
20 posted on
01/09/2013 5:44:06 AM PST by
SMARTY
("The man who has no inner-life is a slave to his surroundings. "Henri Frederic Amiel)
To: Kaslin
Obama is a petty, petulant child. You can bet this nomination is payback for him not getting his real choice, Susan Rice. Nothing Obama ever does is in the spirit of bipartisanship and to even hint at it makes any author lose credibility. It's Obama’s way or there's hell to pay. That's the little emperor's theme.
23 posted on
01/09/2013 5:55:57 AM PST by
liberalh8ter
(If Barack has a memory like a steel trap, why can't he remember what the Constitution says?)
To: Kaslin
Obama being petty. What a surprise /sarc
To: Kaslin
Hagel was an enlisted man, as was I. Having seen poor leadership and been the recipient of stupid orders it was enlightening to work for General JJ Lindsay on his XVIII Airborne Corps Staff as his NCOIC (He was also my first Infantry Battalion Commander in the 82nd). This was because Lindsay was too a former enlisted man who received a battlefield commission on D-Day, and one morning I had the occasion to ask him why it appeared that his entire officer staff, to include one of the other two generals in the command group were former enlisted. To this he responded that having had to do police calls at Fort Bragg as a inductee and been on the bad side of orders, he felt that only those who had been led, and led by poor leadership would have the insight to issue orders that would be well thought and seen from the eyes of someone who actually was going to do the work.
The only good I can see in Hagel is that he too has seen poor leadership and hopefully that one single facet of his heading DOD if it happens is that he knows grunt work. As for his politics, I could not disagree more as I served two years in Tel Aviv at the American Embassy and support that country for several reasons, one of which is Western Civilization; that other is that our Stock Market is very inter-connected with stocks well represented in the Jewish State.
25 posted on
01/09/2013 6:12:29 AM PST by
Jumper
To: Kaslin
According to Politico, the choice "appeals to Obama's bipartisan spirit." It's just effing laughable - the man has no more bipartisan spirit than he does humility or respect for The Constitution.
26 posted on
01/09/2013 6:14:03 AM PST by
Rummyfan
(Iraq: it's not about Iraq anymore, it's about the USA!)
To: Kaslin
Obama’s intent is:
1) to further divide the Republicans against themselves;
2) to pretend to reach across the aisle, justifying blatant partisanship when the Republicans reject it;
3) to put Republicans in a position of negativity again, using up their energy on a sideshow.
At this juncture, Conservatives have no national leader, no strategy, no agenda — and it shows. Obama enjoys competent handlers running his Presidency as a political campaign, and an adulational “news” media eager to play along. Until we close the “figurehead gap”, Obama and company will eat our lunch, with dire results for the nation.
To: Kaslin
Obama’s Cabinet choices indicate that he is the one not willing to accept that he has a mandate from his election. He understands well that those who voted for him are ignorant and he purchased their votes through false promises of wealth distribution and other ridiculous lies. There will be nothing to distribute except unfunded money printing. What really keeps him awake at night is his inferiority complex fueling his hate for the patriots of liberty and the constitution both of which negate his lethal ideology. He can’t resist any opportunity to throw into the present national crisis of leadership his pathetic nominations of obvious hacks. Political operatives who have already proven their unacceptability. They represent Molotov Cocktails of political terror thrown only to further destabilize the Republic of the United States
29 posted on
01/09/2013 7:05:25 AM PST by
Postnbeam
(Obama Cabinet Nominations are Political Molotov Coctails)
To: Kaslin
Occams Razor applies here. Obama selected Hagel because they are sympatico where the “the jews” are concerned.
33 posted on
01/09/2013 9:32:06 AM PST by
jwalsh07
To: Kaslin
>>>>The interesting question is, why? <<<<<
Here’s the answer from the lips of Lenin:
“Deepen [and] exacerbate existing problems, crises, [and] differences, and if they don’t exist, create them or convincingly claim that they exist... and profit [politically, ideologically and even financially] the most from them in any way you can, and, in the resulting chaos, blame our enemies for the whole thing.”
Obama was correct when he announced in 2008 that change had come to America. It’s a slow-motion version of what the Bolsheviks did in Russia. His actions are designed to enflame and antagonize, and with each response, power is concentrated with the left.
There’s no need for a Reichstag fire when dozens of smaller blazes are set across the landscape. No budget. Contradictory statements. Laws with hundreds of pages, followed by thousands of regulations. Stoking racial animosity. Fast and Furious. Gay marriage. Trillion-dollar coins. Raising taxes on the rich, which means everyone paying payroll taxes. I could list dozens more things that are promoted and proposed to confuse, anger, or deflate the feelings of the American people. And while everyone is looking elsewhere, power is consolidated.
God help us.
40 posted on
01/09/2013 9:05:23 PM PST by
redpoll
To: Kaslin
How can a state that elects Tom osborn also elect Hagel and Kerry?
41 posted on
01/09/2013 9:30:35 PM PST by
Terry Mross
(Liberal people who hate me read my posts. It drives them nuts. hee hee)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson