Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/04/2013 11:17:40 AM PST by i88schwartz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
To: i88schwartz

It is first and foremost, a protection FROM government, period!

One only need review the Declaration of Independence and the words “.....when in the course of human events .....that it becomes necessary to overthrow......etc.”

The men that crafted the Declaration and the Bill of Rights INCLUDING the Second Amendment knew oppression, knew sacrifice and knew what they wanted to prevent in future. They were inspired by God and resolute in their intentions and affirmation of our God-given rights.

I will not give up what has been given to me by God and affirmed to me by our Consitution. Ever. Not ever.


2 posted on 01/04/2013 11:24:42 AM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: i88schwartz

WXIX is in Cincinnati. Call letters for a Tucson station
would begin with a K.


3 posted on 01/04/2013 11:26:15 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: i88schwartz
"The Second Amendment is about making sure the population would not be controlled, dominated or oppressed by a government," Swann explained. "It's not my place to tell you what the Founders were thinking, or what they would be thinking today. But the principle of what they put into place had nothing to do with the kind of weapon they were guaranteeing, it was simply about matching force."

Nicely, and succinctly stated.

And, dear FRiends, this is the best argument in favor of our Second Amendment. We should avoid being drawn into trivial discussions about magazine size or military appearance, and etc, as these are losing arguments when the opposing side is playing to emotions.

.

4 posted on 01/04/2013 11:31:08 AM PST by Seaplaner (Never give in. Never give in. Never...except to convictions of honour and good sense. W. Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: i88schwartz

He is right, if you look at the other weapons of the period during the American Revolution the muzzleloading flintlock musket was the assault weapon of its time, it could fire a shot every 15 seconds up to 75 yards or so. The other weapons common in use were cannon, cutting weapons, flintlock pistols and rifles, which loaded slower. Taking into consideration the British were still trying to fight the traditional European way in columns or squares in the open, the Americans could annihilate the British with their muskets. No doubt about it, the founders of this country wanted the general populace to have advanced weaponry to combat a tyrannical government if they wanted it.


8 posted on 01/04/2013 11:48:17 AM PST by WonkyTonky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: i88schwartz

Finally a TV reporter who actually gets it. And now you know why they’re desperate to disarm us.


9 posted on 01/04/2013 11:49:26 AM PST by WKUHilltopper (And yet...we continue to tolerate this crap...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: i88schwartz

Love this guy!

Not about the type of weapon, but the ability to match force.

The british weapon of the period, the musket. Big heavy ball, smooth bore, useful for skirmish line volley fire at short to medium distance (tactics left over from Greek, Roman, Europa infantry).

The higher tech of the militia was the rifle! Smaller caliber, but able to knock an officer off his horse, whack a cannon lighter, or kill a lead team horse from well beyond musket range.

Love this guy!


13 posted on 01/04/2013 11:57:17 AM PST by petro45acp (More sheepdogs please...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: i88schwartz

Yes, the primary focus of recognizing the natural right/God given right codified by the Second Amendment is every citizen’s right to own and use firearms and other arms to deter and stop tyranny, from government and other such groups. This right also includes use of weapons for self defense, our selves and those we need to protect, recreation. hunting, collecting and all uses not in furtherance of a crime [crime in the old sense, not littering or failure to separate recyclables].


16 posted on 01/04/2013 12:03:48 PM PST by RicocheT (Eat the rich only if you're certain it's your last meal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: i88schwartz

“....rights of the individual to be equally armed as military, both foreign and domestic....”

.
Then why can I not have fully automatic firearms and an Abrams tank parked in my garage would make me feel more secure.


20 posted on 01/04/2013 12:12:07 PM PST by 353FMG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: i88schwartz

23 posted on 01/04/2013 12:17:44 PM PST by timestax (AMERICAN MEDIA= DOMESTIC ENEMY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: i88schwartz

This guy nails it.

I need a tank.


24 posted on 01/04/2013 12:19:01 PM PST by Girlene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: i88schwartz

2nd amendment would seem to allow someone who could afford to buy anti-tank or anti-aircraft instruments, for example, to own them.

Of course it doesn’t allow anyone to use them or murder people with them.


29 posted on 01/04/2013 12:38:34 PM PST by ifinnegan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: i88schwartz

You notice that the would be tyrants and oligarchs sure are rushing to disarm us....


34 posted on 01/04/2013 1:45:15 PM PST by Tzimisce (The American Revolution began when the British attempted to disarm the Colonists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

bmfl


35 posted on 01/04/2013 1:45:35 PM PST by Titan Magroyne (What one person receives without working for, another person must work for without receiving.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: i88schwartz

btt


38 posted on 01/04/2013 1:58:39 PM PST by crosshairs (They are only assault weapons in the hands of tyrannical governments and criminals. Ban both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: i88schwartz

I’m shocked, a journalist who gets it.


39 posted on 01/04/2013 2:18:10 PM PST by Lurker (Violence is rarely the answer. But when it is it is the only answer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: i88schwartz

Big bttt! :)


41 posted on 01/04/2013 2:34:20 PM PST by Inyo-Mono (My greatest fear is that when I'm gone my wife will sell my guns for what I told her I paid for them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: i88schwartz

I’ve heard the argument made that even with the weapons Americans possess, they could never beat the fire power of the US military. That is true. Our military could kill us all. But killing everyone and breaking everything in your own Nation won’t happen.

Resistence to an unconstituional, billergent, oppressive government won’t be a war won by the US government if it is waged against Americans over freedom. Americans would not tolerate it.

The government should not make the choice of treason against the constitution and American people. They have permitted the Kenyan to go too far in conducting his war on terror against selected Americans whom the Marxists hate. The KGBish spy development is dangerous...for the government.

The more they violate the constitutional rights of Americans, the more frightened of Americans they become. The more frightened they become, they more they violate America’s constitution and the more they are afraid. In the end, I would not want to be the treasonous idiots who made Americans my enemy.


42 posted on 01/04/2013 2:44:41 PM PST by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: i88schwartz

The 2nd amendment’s purpose is self-evident when observed in the context of the 1st and 3rd.

The 2nd Amendment protects the 1st amendment and our right to criticize the government.

And making it even more obvious that We the People were intended to be armed - is the 3rd Amendment:

“No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.”

Without the 2nd Amendment, the citizen is powerless to deny consent to the would-be occupiers.

So, FU Comrade Feinswine - and stay the hell out of my house.


47 posted on 01/04/2013 3:12:41 PM PST by TArcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: i88schwartz

The purpose of the Second Amendment is to protect the other nine.


48 posted on 01/04/2013 3:31:44 PM PST by Biggirl ("Jesus talked to us as individuals"-Jim Vicevich/Thanks JimV!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: i88schwartz

ping


59 posted on 01/04/2013 8:43:48 PM PST by woweeitsme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson