Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Diogenesis

We need to get over Romney.

He ran, and he lost.

Palin needs to step up now. Give us a real alternative to focus on, and keep us motivated.

Where are you Sarah?


4 posted on 12/28/2012 4:28:21 AM PST by Cringing Negativism Network
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Cringing Negativism Network

> Palin needs to step up now.

Forget Sarah. I admire and respect her, but she is damaged goods. The press pretty much destroyed her.

We don’t need a leader right now as much as we need to demonize the Left and its propaganda arm, the mainstream press. Shouldn’t be hard, considering that they are already demonic.

At this point, we must work as guerrilla cells, attacking the credibility of the press and the glaring hypocrisy and moral turpitude of the Left’s leadership and the Hollywood Left.

Should be very easy to find material. Getting press exposure and airtime is our only challenge.


6 posted on 12/28/2012 4:44:23 AM PST by Westbrook (Children do not divide your love, they multiply it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

“Palin needs to step up now. Give us a real alternative to focus on, and keep us motivated.
Where are you Sarah?”

I agree and I love Palin. But when virtually every media outlet portrays her as incompetent that’s like running a marathon into the full-power jet exhaust from a 747 engine. She would exhaust herself, her money and her support. Even my sister, 69, who is as conservative as they come “knows” how bad Palin is. (This because, like many people, she has CNN playing 24/7 in the background.) My sister thinks she can separate the news from the propaganda but she isn’t that clever and the constant propaganda wins.

The electorate divides roughly into 40% Left/leaning, 40% Right/leaning and 20% Center/leaning. But out of that grouping virtually all of the left are low information voters. I’d estimate that 10% of the right are low information voters and 11% of the center are low information voters. Add in the pervasive effects of the biased media propaganda machine with Hollywood movies and celebrities and Palin is toast. (If the election is close then look for lawsuits and cheating game which the right hasn’t played well.)

Ronald Reagan overcame these odds because he was a celebrity, he had unquestioned gravitas and the times were right. Romney was defeated because, although the time was right, he was Obama Lite. A critical portion of the right stayed home rather than vote for him.

Incidentally, it really annoyed me when Tadd Romney said his father really didn’t want to run.


7 posted on 12/28/2012 4:49:59 AM PST by Gen.Blather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Cringing Negativism Network; Grampa Dave; GOPJ; sickoflibs; justiceseeker93; Tennessee Nana; ...

Romney was the most sap-happy, tight *** candidate we’ve ever seen.

But the dork never looked more stupid and sap-happy than the night he conceded-—in the face of massive voter fraud-—with that patented Republican “look-how-dumb-I-am” grin on his sappy face.

Mitt was duped and dumbed-down til the bitter end.


8 posted on 12/28/2012 4:50:33 AM PST by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson