Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Joe Scarborough Explodes At Rep. Huelskamp’s Assertion That Newtown Tragedy Is Being ‘Politicized’
Mediaite ^ | 12-21-12 | Meenal Vamburkar

Posted on 12/21/2012 9:36:28 AM PST by Mozilla

Things got heated this morning on Morning Joe, when Republican congressman from Kansas, Tim Huelskamp, was asked about his thoughts on gun control following their discussion about the fiscal cliff deal. While Huelskamp’s opposition to an assault weapons ban was a point of contention, it was his assertion that the tragedy in Newtown, Conn. not be used to further a “political agenda” that sent Joe Scarborough over the edge.

Stricter legislation about assault weapons won’t solve the problem, the congressman said. “It’s a people problem.”

“What has bothered me the most as a representative is how this has been politicized so quickly that somehow if we had changed one single law — which as I understand it, the state of Connecticut had laws against these kind of things — and somehow that would have changed things,” Huelskamp said.

Pointing to his own children, Huelskamp noted that video games are an issue, so parents need to be cognizant of what their children are up to. Mental health is also an issue, he said, but “it’s not a gun problem.”

“It’s not a gun problem?” Scarborough asked. “So tell me, why do Americans need assault weapons? Why do they need these high-capacity clips? Why do they need a bushmaster? Can you tell me why?”

Huelskamp countered that there’ve been many “misleading” statements, including on that show.

(Excerpt) Read more at mediaite.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: banglist; brezenzski; guncontrol; joescarborough; newtonmassacre; nwo; secondamendment; stopwatchingnbc; timhuleskamp
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last
Video at the link. I should also add that I was over the limit of words, at first, so I had to drastically cut the post.
1 posted on 12/21/2012 9:36:37 AM PST by Mozilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mozilla

I guess Schmoo Scarborough can’t handle the truth. Really Schmoo? Obama and the Democrats are above playing politics with tragedy when they play politics with EVERYTHING? Why is their SOUL FOCUS on getting answers to this tragedy on guns, and nothing on the culture, the break up of the family (the Lanzas were divorced), violent media, the mental healthcare system, etc? Schmoo, stop trying so hard to get into Mika Brezinski’s pants and being liked by the rest of the demented MessNBC crowd by agreeing with all their stupidity. You’re starting to look as deranged as Hissy Boy Matthews and Special Ed Schultz.


2 posted on 12/21/2012 9:41:09 AM PST by MissesBush (The Fourth Estate has Become a Fifth Column)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mozilla
“So tell me, why do Americans need assault weapons? Why do they need these high-capacity clips? Why do they need a bushmaster? Can you tell me why?” To Quote Tom at RFNJ: "We don't have a Bill of Needs"
3 posted on 12/21/2012 9:42:39 AM PST by hkusp40
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mozilla

“... why do Americans need...?”

Because it’s the “Bill of Rights”, not the “Bill of Needs”. Joe, Ed, Keith, Crissy, and all the rest of you, why is this so hard for you to understand?


4 posted on 12/21/2012 9:46:44 AM PST by beelzepug ("Why bother creating wealth when you can just redistribute it?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mozilla
"So tell me, why do Americans need assault weapons?"

To protect ourselves against the likes of you, Mister Joe Schmuck."

5 posted on 12/21/2012 9:47:35 AM PST by Erasmus (Zwischen des Teufels und des tiefen, blauen Meers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mozilla

o tell me, why do Americans need assault weapons? Why do they need these high-capacity clips? Why do they need a bushmaster?

Because it would be hard to overthrow ObaMugabe’s mau mau communist regime with pee shooters.


6 posted on 12/21/2012 9:47:38 AM PST by y6162
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mozilla

I say we ban high capacity news channels..


7 posted on 12/21/2012 9:48:20 AM PST by cableguymn (The founding fathers would be shooting by now..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mozilla

Why not just give these people the honest answer to why high capacity weapons are needed...because we need to have the means to protect ourselves from our own federal government.


8 posted on 12/21/2012 9:50:44 AM PST by JustaCowgirl (Revolutions are not born out of success, they are born out of despair)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mozilla

The only difference between Mika and Joe is that Mika is smarter.


9 posted on 12/21/2012 9:51:34 AM PST by facedown (Armed in the Heartland)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mozilla
“Do you dare come on my show and say I am using the slaughter of 20 little six- and seven-year-old children, I’m using that for political purposes, Tim?”

Don't ask a question when you're not certain of the answer, you rodent faced phony.

10 posted on 12/21/2012 9:52:18 AM PST by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mozilla
“So tell me, why do Americans need assault weapons? Why do they need these high-capacity clips? Why do they need a bushmaster? Can you tell me why?”

At the risk of engaging a moron in debate, I'll nonetheless answer the question: so that there can be no venue in which a person with evil intent can murder school children without surviving a challenge from a heoric armed defender... who might at least buy enough time to save lives.

> Obviously the law is not a barrier to these acts (virtually every perp involved in a mass shooting has broken multiple laws already on the books - even before the law of murder was broken).
> Obviously resources are not a barrier (many shooters have broken their bank to obtain the means to do their deeds)
> Obviously the idea of the shooter being killed during the rampage is expected as part of the heinous acts, so there's no deterrent there. These people are checking out and trying to take as many with him as possible - so that his name becomes known on shows like this one.

So tell me, Mr. Scarborough (et al), how do you expect to legislate an end to this problem? Or do you wish to add to the list of victims in target-rich, arms-free public environments by assuming that having a gun in hand makes a person evil by association.

(rant over)

11 posted on 12/21/2012 9:53:15 AM PST by alancarp (Obama will grab your guns and ship them to Mexican drug mobs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mozilla
“So tell me, why do Americans need assault weapons?

The same reason why irresponsible, ignorant journalists NEED a TV show.

12 posted on 12/21/2012 9:53:55 AM PST by AAABEST (Et lux in tenebris lucet: et tenebrae eam non comprehenderunt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mozilla
Rep. Huelskamp is totally correct with this assertion. The media is definitely using this as a *political agenda* Look at Joe's own reply of how he became blatantly defensive to a guess. He didn't like being called out, did he. Joe lives amongst liberals and does not have the guts to call out how pop/ rap culture effects our society w/ some of the most inflammatory words and messages in their songs. He's a suck-up for ratings to which he likes to give the libs who watch him help with an agenda (to get those crazy gun owners unarmed). Yes, he has been using the tragedy to paint a picture and a line.
13 posted on 12/21/2012 9:55:45 AM PST by Christie at the beach (I like Newt. Our nation's foundation is under attack.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hkusp40

It didn’t take America long to forget 911.


14 posted on 12/21/2012 9:56:37 AM PST by mylife (The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: alancarp
(rant continuing for a moment)

Somebody please remind these ninnies what our response to 9/11 was:

> Guns were already banned on commercial flights
> Guns were not used during those high-jackings

Despite these facts, we installed armed sky marshals aboard commercial planes. See any parallels??

15 posted on 12/21/2012 9:59:12 AM PST by alancarp (Obama will grab your guns and ship them to Mexican drug mobs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Mozilla

Scarborough asked “So tell me, why do Americans need assault weapons? Why do they need these high-capacity clips? Why do they need a bushmaster? Can you tell me why?”

Because AG Eric Holder and P_sident Obama have given thousands of them to Mexican drug lords and other bad guys that use those weapons to kill innocent men, women and children in their own country and to kill our Border Patrol Agents, LEOs and other American civilians.


16 posted on 12/21/2012 9:59:47 AM PST by RebelTex (Soli Deo Gloria, "To God alone the glory")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Christie at the beach
Leaving aside the Left's clear longstanding goal of disarming the American public... gee Joe, when one immediately proposes a political solution to solve a problem then, yes, they are by definition politicizing the issue.

Its not hard to understand.

17 posted on 12/21/2012 10:03:38 AM PST by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Mozilla
“It’s not a gun problem?” Scarborough asked. “So tell me, why do Americans need assault weapons? Why do they need these high-capacity clips? Why do they need a bushmaster? Can you tell me why?”

Joe sounds exactly like all the other rabid liberals on the network so the transformation is now complete.

Joe, the Liberal RINO. ...he mocked and ridiculed the Republican presidential nominee more than anyone. I would bet he voted for Obama.

18 posted on 12/21/2012 10:03:42 AM PST by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mozilla

we have to back up and attack the language these people use. “need”? This language presupposes someone should not be allowed to have something unless the government agrees they ‘need’ it. Our side can not allow language like this to stand unchallenged. Does anyone really ‘need’ an abortion?


19 posted on 12/21/2012 10:06:10 AM PST by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mozilla
I would love to see someone ask Joe Scarborough the following questions:
1. Were you having an affair with Lori Klausutis?
2. Was she carrying your child when she was killed?
3. Did you kill Lori Klausutis in 2001?
20 posted on 12/21/2012 10:06:15 AM PST by dainbramaged (Joe McCarthy was right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson