Posted on 12/17/2012 4:28:04 AM PST by Kaslin
Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:
Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of general interest.
Thanks! One of my boys was 9 lbs. It was a surprise to see such a big baby!
Most of the people I know with large families also have pets, so it’s not one or the other, as the author writes. We currently have “only” six pets (two cats, four lizards), but we’ve had as many as 11 at one time.
It could mean that your circle of friends aren’t guilt ridden whacked out liberals.
Congratulations!
Narcissism at its finest.
**
Amen
It could mean that your circle of friends aren’t guilt ridden whacked out liberals.
That definitely has something to do with it. However, in my parents circle which included only Christian Republicans they were only having two children for the most part...My parents are 67 years old. My parents did have 3 but was looked on as “a lot”. My friends are mostly conservative but I have a few RINO friends amongst them. They vote Republican but are not near as conservative as my wife and I are.
Well, not intentionally, anyway, but it is the unintended consequences which could make that a reality.
Doggy ping list and Kitty ping list if you know who has that.
Thank you much!
That was my thought when reading that post -
a “subsistence agrarian society” is EXACTLY what we’re “going back to soon”.
Or it could be that after a couple generations of no fault divorce, a divorce rate of over 50% which has created a vast public/private divorce industry and a “family court” system that is very hostile to fathers, many men are saying no when it comes to playing this game. The risk/reward math no longer pencils out.
If the drop in birthrate were limited to societies in which those circumstances prevailed, then the, shall we say, “male crisis” might be considered causative. However, below-replacement birthrates are found in countries with a wide variety of legal and social systems.
Yes..and abortion! There will be great hell to pay.
It began striking me not long ago in any large public gathering (concert, sporting event, church service) how few pregnant women I was actually seeing. Just by the sheer law of averages common sense was telling me I should have been seeing many more.
Is it better to have unexpected babies?
Demographically, when a nation reaches a particular economic plateau unique to them, suddenly its birthrate drops from strong growth to just a “maintenance” birthrate of 2.1 to 2.3 children per family.
The most recent of these drops has happened in Mexico and much of the Arab world.
Importantly, government and culture are almost incapable of increasing the birthrate, but they can drive it down even further rather easily.
Only once has this situation been reversed, in the post-WWII baby boom in the US, which came about because of a unique set of conditions.
To start with, during the war there was a long period of “delayed sexuality”, in which many men and women who otherwise would have had sex for pleasure instead of procreation, could not. This meant that when the men came home, the emphasis for sex had shifted strongly to procreation. This abstinence meant that they had a great abundance, a surplus of energy, to make and raise children.
The next factor was the explosive growth of cities with suburbs across the US. Suburbia is far better for having and raising children than are high density urban areas. And along with these new cities and suburbs there was a huge demand for high wage employment.
Importantly, these jobs were for men, but with relatively low taxes, a single breadwinner could support his family, with his wife at home to raise their children. While many more women were educated, being left at home and bored was a good motivation to have children.
Another factor was how these boom towns had few adult entertainments, and were designed with a family orientation, that is, plenty of churches, schools, children’s recreation, shopping malls, etc.
There is also a long list of the things government and the culture did to dampen down the baby boom, and to drive the birthrate down strongly after this period; and most of these restraints still exist today.
Declining birth rate is the way we're locking in economic decline.
Just watched a program on the “Black Death”.
After burning itself out in the wake of killing nearly 50% of the population of Europe, the Plague actually caused a Baby Boom.
Good grief...I hope we don’t need something like THAT to adjust the American Birthrate!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.