Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Walmart Bails On Obamacare-Sticks Taxpayers With Employee Healthcare Costs
forbes ^ | december 9, 2012 | rick ungar

Posted on 12/10/2012 3:03:18 AM PST by lowbridge

After making a big deal of publicly supporting the Affordable Care Act, Walmart—the nation’s largest private sector employer—is joining the ranks of companies seeking to avoid their obligation to provide employees with health insurance as required by Obamacare.

It was not all that many years ago that Walmart announced, in response to harsh criticism over the low pay provided to Walmart ‘associates’, that the company would provide a healthcare benefit to its part-time, low earning employees. The uncharacteristically generous nod to worker needs was short lived as the company partially pulled back on the commitment in 2011, citing premium rate increases that Walmart deemed beyond their capacity to pay.

Now, Huffington Post is reporting that the party is over for many more existing Walmart employees, along with all employees hired after February 1, 2012 that the company can classify as “part-time.”

According to the 2013 Walmart “Associate’s Benefit Book”—the manual for low-level Walmart employees—part-time workers who got their jobs during or after 2011 will now be subject to an “Annual Benefits Eligibility Check” each August.

Employees hired after Feb. 1, 2012, who fail to average the magic 30-hours per week requiring a company to provide a healthcare benefit, will lose their healthcare benefits on the following January. Part-time workers hired after Jan. 15, 2011, but before Feb. 1, 2012, will be able to hang onto their Walmart health care benefit if they work at least 24 hours a week.

Anyone hired before 2011 will not be cut off from the company provided health insurance.

(Excerpt) Read more at forbes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bhohealthcare; healthcare; obamacare; retail; socializedmedicine; walmart; workplace
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-106 next last
To: P.O.E.

We’ll get single payer nationalized healthcare when Corporate America demands it. Walmart’s move is just the first step in that direction.


41 posted on 12/10/2012 5:49:58 AM PST by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Sooth2222

You forget that lower income people (defined in the law as anyone making less than $88,000,i think) will receive subsidies through the exchanges. For a waitress, I’m sure that subsidy will be more than the cost of her insurance plan.

She won’t necessarily look at this as a bad thing. She won’t be beholden to any one employer anymore for her health coverage, and she may end up with higher take home pay, since the evil rich will be paying the bills. Win-win (for her).


42 posted on 12/10/2012 5:50:05 AM PST by RightFighter (It was all for nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: P.O.E.

Also, by paying your own fare, you’re going to seek ways to minimize your costs, leading to lower costs for all.


43 posted on 12/10/2012 5:52:41 AM PST by Jonty30 (What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death cults.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: P.O.E.

“Many Walmart employees qualify for and get FOOD STAMPS.
In other words, the government is subsidizing Walmart.”

Not this BS again. Walmart pays a legal wage and are under no obligation ot pay more than minimum wage to any employee. If the workers dont like it they can find another job.


44 posted on 12/10/2012 5:56:15 AM PST by Brooklyn Attitude (Obama being re-elected is the political equivalent of OJ being found not guilty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: TheRobb7

You have hit on the exact issue with O’care I have been talking about for quite sometime since the SCOTUS debacle.

Because Robert’s deemed this a “TAX” once the first corp. or individual pays this “TAX” then O’care can be challenged in court.
Legally “TAXES” can only be levied through the House Of Representatives and declared a tax, which can then be added to the tax code. O’care was written as an “Individual Mandate”
not a tax!


45 posted on 12/10/2012 6:12:09 AM PST by Fully Awake DAV (Navy Vet when homosexuality was not tolerated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

Exactly! What happens next.. Well, the tax revenue into the IRS will drop significantly! How is the subsidy for all those new “insured” going to be subsidized through the “Healthcare Exchanges”? This is a system that will fail! If folks think the U.S. is bankrupt now... wait till 2015!


46 posted on 12/10/2012 6:17:50 AM PST by Fully Awake DAV (Navy Vet when homosexuality was not tolerated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Excellent tagline, so why did you help reelect Obama?


47 posted on 12/10/2012 6:19:15 AM PST by Conservativegreatgrandma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

Obama’s Communist Method: ‘Free’ Communal Control of the Medical Profession for everyone.


48 posted on 12/10/2012 6:22:19 AM PST by Graewoulf ((Traitor John Roberts' Obama"care" violates Sherman Anti-Trust Law, AND the U.S. Constitution.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: calex59

I didn’t like the Roberts ruling either.

I just can’t help wondering if perhaps he saw something that we didn’t.

History will decide if he was right or wrong. Either way its gonna be a bumpy ride.


49 posted on 12/10/2012 6:23:51 AM PST by TheRobb7 ("Patriots don't negotiate the terms of our enslavement"--JimRob)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge
Yeah, because there's such a HUGE difference between passing it on to the taxpayer, and passing it on to consumers (which is where ALL cost increases are put for ALL companies).

(In fact, the Lefty morons should celebrate this, instead of lament it. Their beloved "poor" are hurt worse by price increases than they are hurt by tax increases, since they pay far less of the taxes than those eeeeevil rich do!)

50 posted on 12/10/2012 6:30:49 AM PST by Teacher317 ('Tis time to fear when tyrants seem to kiss.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

(Hint to the Obama folk: WE are the taxpayers... and WE are the consumers. Either way, the costs of Obamacare are passed on to us all.)


51 posted on 12/10/2012 6:32:23 AM PST by Teacher317 ('Tis time to fear when tyrants seem to kiss.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Samurai_Jack
They get what they voted for.

You took the words right out of my mouth. Screw 'em.

52 posted on 12/10/2012 6:38:42 AM PST by Redcloak (Winter is coming.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

No surprise. This was predicted before Obamacare passed. Look for many other employers to follow.


53 posted on 12/10/2012 6:39:28 AM PST by Forgiven_Sinner (Seek you first the kingdom of God, and all things will be given to you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

Even if companies like Walmart paid the insurance, the employees would have to pay in as well. On little more than minimum wage, where would the employee get his/her share? These jobs don’t pay enough to pay for health care and still afford food and shelter. This whole health care bill was to turn health care into a government take over. AND it’s working.


54 posted on 12/10/2012 6:44:34 AM PST by tioga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: calex59

Part of an orchestrated strategy.

The Leftist-Union takedown of Walmart is underway.


55 posted on 12/10/2012 6:44:34 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: calex59

Way to leftist to read past the first three sentences out of fear of getting kooties from it. Other than managers, Walmart doesn’t have full time employees so there is not “obligation” to give any benefits. That is the same with many companies these days. No company looking at it’s bottom line and to it’s stockholders wants to kow down to husseincare.


56 posted on 12/10/2012 6:50:52 AM PST by bgill (We've passed the point of no return. Welcome to Al Amerika.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: P.O.E.
15% of America is on foodstamps, Bub

Anyone working in a low end retail or restaurant job can probably qualify for food stamps.

Seniors on fixed incomes? Food stamps.

COLLEGE students? Food stamps.
Low ranking enlisted people in the military? Food stamps.
Children of illegal immigrants? FOOD STAMPS. They can even get info about applying while they are still in Mexico....
an OPEC country.

So your point is????

Who ISN'T SUBSIDIZED by the OBAMA government???

WalMart alone can and should fix this by paying unskilled people more than their average worker pay of $12 an hour? ($9 an hour to start, plus benefits, 30% above minimum wage for minimally productive unskilled workers)

Guess what happens if Walmart pays more and raises prices? The people who shop there with FOOD STAMPS get to pay higher prices. How's that gonna work for them?

At least people with jobs of any kind use food stamps as a supplement, not the entire food budget

57 posted on 12/10/2012 6:54:13 AM PST by silverleaf (Age Takes a Toll: Please Have Exact Change)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: TheRobb7

The fine was set at a “Low introductory rate” in order to get this bloated dead whale in the harbor and onto the beach. They will raise it until the proles bleed.


58 posted on 12/10/2012 7:03:01 AM PST by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Brooklyn Attitude
If the workers dont like it they can find another job

You're kidding, right?

59 posted on 12/10/2012 7:38:15 AM PST by P.O.E. (Pray for America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf
Who ISN'T SUBSIDIZED by the OBAMA government???

Touche.

60 posted on 12/10/2012 7:39:42 AM PST by P.O.E. (Pray for America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-106 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson