Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/09/2012 12:52:28 PM PST by WilliamIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: WilliamIII

Just another opportunity for SCOTUS to stick a knife in the back of decent Americans. We might as well get used to it.


2 posted on 12/09/2012 12:56:42 PM PST by FlingWingFlyer (I feel sad for my once great country. We deserve everything that is about to happen to us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WilliamIII

Kennedy horribly socially liberal. We know where this is headed.


3 posted on 12/09/2012 12:59:21 PM PST by RIghtwardHo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WilliamIII
We know Kennedy stands up for some gay rights.

But we don't know that that extends as far as marriage. We'll see.

4 posted on 12/09/2012 1:00:33 PM PST by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WilliamIII

If it’s Scalia vs. Kennedy then it’s over, right? Four lib’s plus Kennedy.


6 posted on 12/09/2012 1:02:00 PM PST by Behind the Blue Wall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WilliamIII
“Now the ideological fight between the conservative giants..”

I stopped reading at that point. Anyone that thinks Kennedy is anything but a left tilted moderate has nothing intelligent to say.

7 posted on 12/09/2012 1:02:37 PM PST by Beagle8U (Free Republic -- One stop shopping ....... It's the Conservative Super WalMart for news .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WilliamIII
Congress could have passed DOMA with a provision that removed it from court review. Article III, “with such exceptions . . . as Congress shall make.”

Its not as if the Framers designed Scotus to be supreme among the branches; Congress has allowed and encouraged it.

10 posted on 12/09/2012 1:07:29 PM PST by Jacquerie ("How few were left who had seen the republic!" - Tacitus, The Annals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WilliamIII
One of the reasons that societies fall is that they convince the normal productive members to no longer support and protect the society as whole by granting special status and protection to members that do not contribute sustainability to that society.

Those that sustain a society are denied the protection of that society in favor of those that don't, and they return the sentiment.

14 posted on 12/09/2012 1:17:38 PM PST by Navy Patriot (Join the Democrats, it's not Fascism when WE do it, and the Constitution and law mean what WE say.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WilliamIII
In the spring of 2013 Kennedy will be focused on his legacy and his place in American history.

He has the option to be seen by liberal historians as the man who wrote the majority opinion striking down gay marriage laws.

or

He can uphold Pro Family anti gay marriage laws until the next case comes before the SCOTUS when Obama will have two or three appointments to the Court.

The most scary aspect is that by January 20, 2017 the SCOTUS could have five of its nine justices appointed by Barack Obama.

16 posted on 12/09/2012 1:30:38 PM PST by OKRA2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WilliamIII; P-Marlowe; Girlene; Forest Keeper

This isn’t really about gay marriage as much as it’s about whether voters can vote a particular definition of marriage and then have it overturned by a court.

Isn’t that the case they took up?

Seems to me that there are plenty of gay marriage votes in other states that Kennedy has not seen fit to challenge, so it really isn’t about whether those are constitutional.

Is it possible for a court to overturn a properly held vote of the people? Am I wrong on this....that this is not that case?


18 posted on 12/09/2012 1:47:42 PM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! True supporters of our troops pray for their victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WilliamIII

Kennedy is not a libertarian. He’s a raving liberal.

Libertarians are passive on a lot of things, but he generally attempts not to permit but to enforce the liberal social agenda. He’s more conservative economically.


21 posted on 12/09/2012 2:02:01 PM PST by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WilliamIII

If this perversion is approved, there is little that won’t be allowed in the future.


25 posted on 12/09/2012 2:35:03 PM PST by Proud2BeRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WilliamIII

If anyone thinks that the court will not rule that all gay marriages are all right is crazy. Why would they rule that society has a right to restrict this? They will never let the public decide for itself what society’s standards are to be. There are no more standards. This court will make it clear that the battle is over.


26 posted on 12/09/2012 2:39:52 PM PST by LachlanMinnesota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WilliamIII

No pro-same-sex argument I can imagine would be exempt from use to justify polygamy.


28 posted on 12/09/2012 4:36:16 PM PST by dagogo redux (A whiff of primitive spirits in the air, harbingers of an impending descent into the feral.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WilliamIII
The two 76-year-olds are to some extent likely to be on opposite sides when the court meets in the spring to decide whether the government can refuse marriage and federal benefits to gays and lesbians.

In which case, it's all over but the crying. Kennedy will join with the liberal whackjobs and that will be 5 votes. Or 6, maybe, depending on if Roberts has a fight with his boyfriend or whatever.

37 posted on 12/10/2012 12:54:51 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson