I explained previously that my opinion is based on what has been presented here and in the media. I've served on a grand jury. If what I've read were presented to me as a jury member there is no way I could possibly vote a true bill for murder, manslaughter or reckless homicide against the officer.
You keep forgetting that all we have are accusations
No, there are rational and reasonable questions and explanations. If the accused were not stealing, why did Walmart employees notify security? When the uniformed officer attempted to question them, why did they assault the officer and attempt to escape? Apparently the victim was guilty of criminal trespass prior to the incident.
If we look at the case in Las Vegas at the COSTCO there's an employee who is getting his britches sued off in a civil suit for telling a story to the cops that resulted in the shooting death of a customer ~ you might want to read it.
The evidence trail starts with the store security looking at video images ....... I think somebody is going to look at them eh! The officer's reactions, even if illfounded, may well have been lawful given what the store security people told him However, what they told him may have been total BS.
Since there's a dead body there in the passenger's seat I do believe EVERYTHING is on the table in this one.
BTW, if you want to check out the Erik Scott case, here's a start; >http://www.google.com/#hl=en&tbo=d&biw=1600&bih=794&sclient=psy-ab&q=las+vegas+costco+shooting+erik+scott&oq=las+vegas+costco+shooting+erik+scott&gs_l=hp.3..0.1587.11129.0.11357.40.38.2.0.0.3.668.6178.10j22j2j1j0j3.38.0.les%3Beqn%2Crate_low%3D0-035%2Crate_high%3D0-035%2Cmin_length%3D2%2Ccconf%3D1-2%2Csecond_pass%3Dfalse%2Cnum_suggestions%3D1%2Cignore_bad_origquery%3Dtrue%2Conetoken%3Dfalse..0.0...1c.1.jwgbZun6ggU&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.&bvm=bv.1354675689,d.b2U&fp=8c8501555700dc2e&bpcl=39650382