Even video 'evidence' isn't really 'evidence' until it's been examined and thought about, and run through a trial.
You keep forgetting that all we have are accusations, and in the end this case could turn out the other way around.
I explained previously that my opinion is based on what has been presented here and in the media. I've served on a grand jury. If what I've read were presented to me as a jury member there is no way I could possibly vote a true bill for murder, manslaughter or reckless homicide against the officer.
You keep forgetting that all we have are accusations
No, there are rational and reasonable questions and explanations. If the accused were not stealing, why did Walmart employees notify security? When the uniformed officer attempted to question them, why did they assault the officer and attempt to escape? Apparently the victim was guilty of criminal trespass prior to the incident.