Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

If we're looking at a higher top rate, why not hit just the truly 1 percent - the folks who really make millions yearly? $250k may sound like a lot, but in expensive parts of the country it's not real wealth.
1 posted on 11/30/2012 1:36:17 PM PST by WilliamIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
To: WilliamIII

Lets slap a 90% capitol gains tax on anyone with a net value over one billion.


2 posted on 11/30/2012 1:38:46 PM PST by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WilliamIII

Ooooo...Buffett sounds like he’s getting nervous. This fits the category of “Be Careful What You Wish For”.


3 posted on 11/30/2012 1:39:13 PM PST by HarleyD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WilliamIII

If we’re looking at a higher top rate, why not hit just the truly 1 percent - the folks who really make millions yearly? $250k may sound like a lot, but in expensive parts of the country it’s not real wealth.


Agreed. Warren might be on to something, here.


4 posted on 11/30/2012 1:39:13 PM PST by teflon9 (Political campaigns should follow Johnny Mercer's advice--Accentuate the positive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WilliamIII

Let’s take advice from a guy that pays no taxes, other than dividend and capital gains. Worth as much as advice from a homeless bum, as neither are impacted.


5 posted on 11/30/2012 1:40:17 PM PST by ilgipper (Obama supporters are comprised of the uninformed & the ill-informed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WilliamIII

Warren, pay the nearly $1 billion (yes, with a ‘B’) in back taxes you owe the IRS for the past 10 years, and then you’ll have some credibility to talk about taxes.


6 posted on 11/30/2012 1:41:22 PM PST by justlurking (tagline removed, as demanded by Admin Moderator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WilliamIII

How did this become a discussion about tax rates and not spending. the Republican party is totally incompetent.


7 posted on 11/30/2012 1:41:37 PM PST by ilgipper (Obama supporters are comprised of the uninformed & the ill-informed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

Help FR Continue the Conservative Fight!
Your Monthly and Quarterly Donations
Help To Keep FR In The Fight !!

Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!


8 posted on 11/30/2012 1:42:40 PM PST by musicman (Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WilliamIII

Pay your back taxes before you worry about what other people should pay, you old pervert.


11 posted on 11/30/2012 1:45:52 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (Labor unions are the Communist Party of the USA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WilliamIII

Hey 500k 1000k 250k gosh 100k tax em all. That neighbor that you used to know you know, the one with the awesome pool, the one you wanted to grow up and be like. Just take his stuff oh wait you didn’t get the pool, or etc. etc. etc. so now I’m rambling on and on. Congrats America. I’m done now, sorry.


13 posted on 11/30/2012 1:46:10 PM PST by VaRepublican (I would propagate taglines but I don't know how. But bloggers do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WilliamIII
Buffett's introducing the "compromise solution".

The Dems will "soften" and propose tax only those $500,000 and higher in the next deal offering.

16 posted on 11/30/2012 1:51:46 PM PST by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WilliamIII

If, as I believe, the central socialist government resembles what was eroding Spain in 1936, then weasels like Buffet (he goes through the line and TAKES) would be one of the first to disappear.


18 posted on 11/30/2012 1:54:29 PM PST by IbJensen (Liberals are like Slinkies, good for nothing, but you smile as you push them down the stairs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WilliamIII

Here’s an idea: let’s tax big-mouth liberals of the “ i have so much money I don’t mind paying more taxes “ type 90% of their net worth....with the option to reduce it to 75% if they promise to shut up and go away.


20 posted on 11/30/2012 1:59:05 PM PST by wny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WilliamIII

Because it would be an even smaller drop in the bucket than the $250K deal? :-)


23 posted on 11/30/2012 2:00:54 PM PST by ltc8k6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WilliamIII
If we're looking at a higher top rate, why not hit just the truly 1 percent - the folks who really make millions yearly?

Good thing you are not John Boehner, not that he's going to do any better.

I am reminded of a quote from Sir Winston:

Churchill: Madam, would you sleep with me for five million pounds?
Socialite: My goodness, Mr. Churchill... Well, I suppose... we would have to discuss terms, of course...
Churchill: Would you sleep with me for five pounds?
Socialite: Mr. Churchill, what kind of woman do you think I am?!
Churchill: Madam, we've already established that. Now we are haggling about the price.

As soon as you concede the legitimacy of class warfare, you lose! You are not conservative! The libtards' game is to get us to accept a millionaire's tax, and then to keep redefining "millionaire" downwards.

Taxes should be low and flat. Period.

24 posted on 11/30/2012 2:03:09 PM PST by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WilliamIII; All

Warren is in the tax shelter business.

Life insurance remains one of the best tax shelters around, and Warren is deep into the insurance business.


27 posted on 11/30/2012 2:26:36 PM PST by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WilliamIII

If anything, the people making 500k and above should see additional tax cuts as it is their spending and investing that fuels the economy.


29 posted on 11/30/2012 2:33:57 PM PST by OKRA2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WilliamIII

and........... decrease the standard deduction. It’s basic fairness


31 posted on 11/30/2012 2:35:46 PM PST by bert ((K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 .....The fairest Deduction to be reduced is the Standard Deduction)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WilliamIII

When did Warren Buffet get elected to office. Warren, sit down and STFU!!


32 posted on 11/30/2012 2:48:26 PM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WilliamIII
If Congress took Buffett’s suggestions, what would Buffett do with his income? He'd move it around to avoid the new taxes, just as every other person affected by these laws would do.

No doubt Buffett has reasons for promoting higher taxes for the wealthy, but my guess is that it is not he that needs to pay more taxes, but the other guy. Liberals always believe the other guy, not themselves, are not paying enough taxes. It's part of their "blame everybody else" philosophy. Obama is an expert.

35 posted on 11/30/2012 3:33:19 PM PST by Mister Da (The mark of a wise man is not what he knows, but what he knows he doesn't know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WilliamIII

Buffo’s wealth is out of reach of our tax code, so he can shoot off his mouth all day.


38 posted on 11/30/2012 4:00:47 PM PST by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson