Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MrB

He’s separating attraction from action, and saying that being attracted to same sex is far different from having sex with the same sex.

Just as a man might be attracted to a woman who is not his wife, but that isn’t a sin. The sin is when he acts on that attraction, and has sex with a woman who is not his wife.

Similarly, one might also be tempted to steal, lie, cheat, or even kill,but not take the step to act on that.


49 posted on 11/30/2012 12:42:51 PM PST by Burkean (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: Burkean

OK, so, to paraphrase some other sin into his quote -

“it’s not a sin to be tempted to steal something, but it MIGHT BE a sin to actually steal it. MIGHT BE.”

What he’s saying is that it MIGHT BE a sin, which means he’s saying that it possibly could NOT be a sin.

If he were, as you say, separating the act from the temptation, he wouldn’t have said “might be”, much less RE stated “might be” for emphasis.


54 posted on 11/30/2012 12:46:43 PM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

To: Burkean

Read Matthew 5. Jesus says that if a man looks at a woman with lust,he has already committed adultery, and the same with murder. Thank God for His grace and forgiveness!


99 posted on 11/30/2012 4:27:06 PM PST by Freestate316 (Know what you believe and why you believe it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson