[haffast]

““Boogieman — you were asking who accuses only Catholics, well, Haffast is giving you an example”

Is posting some links on Catholic cases equivalent to saying that only Catholics commit sex abuse? That wouldn’t be my first assumption, but let’s ask Haffast. Is that what you meant to imply when you posted that list of links?””

Of course not. Neither was it my intent for you to incur the wrath of Chronos by my initial posting to you. My apologies to you.

My intent was for the Catholic apologists on this thread to take a step back and do some introspection. It appears I was far too indirect, and some can’t be shamed.

First assumptions are rather telling.

[Cronos]

really, haffast, your posting history demonstrates otherwise...

[Cronos]

are you saying one thing and posting another?

[haffast]

“Chronos” = “Cronos”

Sorry.

[Cronos]

John 8:44 You belong to your father, the devil, and you want to carry out your father’s desires. He was a murderer from the beginning, not holding to the truth, for there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks his native language, for he is a liar and the father of lies.

[Cronos]

John 8:55 Though you do not know him, I know him. If I said I did not, I would be a liar like you, but I do know him and obey his word.

[Cronos]

furthermore, boogieman, a poster who’s recent posting history consists solely of “posting links on Cathlic cases”, even when, as in this article, it has nothing to do with Catholics is a pretty good example of the type of poster you were asking about...