Lying seems to come naturally with this bird, no offense to birds meant.
I believe from the vast collection of articles in the confusion of the aftermath of the Libyan event, which is still the rule today that there was some illicit operation going on that has to be covered up by the WH, or the event will trigger knowledge of abuse of power by the WH, and the political party he represents.
We won’t know the answer for some time yet as those that can answer are obviously threatened, and evading answering questions, as well others are working to sabotage investigations that could, would expose their leader, and their Political Party to difficulties.
The whole Obama presence is a manipulated theater.
It indicates his cowardly position to not defend Americans. It gave him a chance to lie and set up a straw man to make his fellow islamic leaders think he was down with the cause (The future does not belong to those who insult islam.) I get a little throw up in my mouth when I think of his UN performance and how Clinton lied to the father of the dead seal.
Because he botched the response.
A good President would’ve received word on the attack, ascertained that it was a coordinated terrorist attack, as the CIA knew ... and sent in the nearby Delta team to secure the facility and rescue the ambassador. My understanding is that, with quick action, this could’ve been done within a matter of hours — long before the Ambassador and SEALs were killed.
But, he didn’t. He waited around. He went to a fundraiser. He blamed it on a movie. And, people died. He lied because their blood is on his hands ... and he was up for reelection. He underestimated the threat, and catastrophically fumbled his role as CIC, and good men died because of it.
SnakeDoc
Because bullchit is all he got that’s shovel ready.
“It is true that John McCain has not psoken of my Muslim faith.” -Obama.
“I will stand with the Muslims if the political winds shift in an ugly direction.” -Obama.
That’s why.
Because they are selling weapons to the Syrian rebels, which have fallen into the hands of Al Queda. They are lying to cover up what’s going on over there.
Why indeed? Seems the obvious answer is that he wanted to maintain the fiction of a peaceful Arab Spring and “his” elimination of AlQueda until the election. Any objective citizen can see that.
The process? I’ve been hearing the story of a hostage swap everywhere, and it may not fly. How’s this sound: he was allowing the ambassador to get taken hostage only to get tough and demand his release just before the election. A couple “rogue” cia/military guys refused to stand down and killed 40 muzzies, enraging the crowd... while Stevens hid in a safe room. The operation went FUBAR and Obama insisted on pushing the Youtube story against ALL logic.
And now the massive cover up. The sin may have been forgivable, but NOT a cover up of this size, Ask Nixon.
Because Valerie Jarrett ordered him to?
His base is easily fooled. He needed a certain segment of undecideds and independents to recapture glory. His lies helped him.
Because he stands to gain.
The same reason a dog........because he can.
There were two reasons to lie. The first is that the Obama regime and Hillary were right in the middle of defending the Muslim Brotherhood, and the regimes romance with Arab Spring. Remember al-Qaeda was supposed to be dead with Osama, and Obama was bragging about being responsible for the deed. All that nonsense from the regime blew up at Benghazi. The other reason was that using the video as an excuse for the terrorism helped the regime lay some of the blame on conservatives and people who don’t buy into the Islam is peace lie. The terrorism became the fault of the people who are critical of this regime’s foreign policy.
Why would he lie? Why did he lie?That's what congenital liars and communists do. Haters hate. Destroyers destroy. Creators create. Builders build. Congenital liars and communists tell lies even when telling the truth would be to their advantage.
It's impossible to plan an attack against a particular person on a particular day at a particular location unless you have a guarantee that person will be at that location on that particular day.
The only people that could guarantee Stevens would be there on that particular day is Hillary and Obama.
That's why they had to create the spontaneous myth. Planning that far in advance means the WH has to be in the loop.
When the spontaneous lie fell through the only alternative was to make it appear as if there was NO connection with the protest in Egypt and the attack.
By continuing to lie and claim it was a spontaneous attack, everyone else continued making the claim there was no connection.
Even if the terrorist had learned of the planned protest in Egypt a week in advance then planned the attack, someone would have had to leak to the terrorist that Stevens would be at that location on that day. In that case fingers would be pointing to leaks coming from Hilly's office.
Spontaneous attack or no connection are their only two options to not be in the loop.
I dunno. He doesn’t know how to do anything else?
For me, there is an even greater question.
Why did Obama let those four ‘white’ Americans die.
The evidence suggests that the Obama administration has not simply been engaging, legitimating, enriching and emboldening Islamists who have taken over or are ascendant in much of the Middle East. Starting in March 2011, when American diplomat J. Christopher Stevens was designated the liaison to the “opposition” in Libya, the Obama administration has been arming them, including jihadists like Abdelhakim Belhadj, leader of the al Qaeda franchise known as the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/oct/22/the-real-reason-behind-benghazigate/
1) he is a psychopath
2) he is a democrat
3) the election
4) October surprise of negotiating a trade for our ambassador for the blind sheik
5) using Benghazi as channel to smuggle arms via Turkey to Syrian rebels (defeat of existing Syrian regime to install Muslim Brotherhood)
6) continue talking point that Libya was Obama’s showcase for Muslim Brotherhood
7) show that Al Quaeda had been decimated
8) because he wanted to
9) to divert attention from other illegal activities
10) some of the above
11) all the above