Priebus Will Announce Bid To Seek Re-Election As RNC Leader [Hell, NO!]

WashingtonTimes ^ | November 16, 2012 | Ralph Z. Hallow

[Mr. Jeeves]

It will be Bush/Rubio, instead - but yeah, it’s underway.

[sirchtruth]

Who cares what the STUPID party does? They're done!

I've never seen a bigger bunch of idiots in my life, besides the evil scum on the other side of the isle.

[brewcrew]

...or the evil scum on the other side of the aisle.

[DCBryan1]

I vote Alan Keyes!

[DemforBush]

I’d have to disagree. I’d say putting Michael Steele back in charge would have been far, far worse than Priebus. Reince, at least, stuck to his positions in interviews.

Also, Reince’s stiffest competition for the RNC Chair the first time out was Saul Anuzis, who was ousted from the Michigan GOP leadership by the Tea Party. Not exactly the conservative firebrand one might hope for, and I don’t see how either man could possibly have changed the outcome of the 2012 elections.

[generally]

Bill Whittle. Unless we want him to run for President.

[arthurus]

It does not matter even a little who is RNC chair. He will be a Republican and that is the problem. It is the Republican Party we are talking about; it has no room for conservatives who make it difficult for Republicans socially in Georgetown. If they don’t control their conservatives they get snubbed at the high toned cocktail parties or maybe are not even invited.

[Eric in the Ozarks]

Clean sweep !

[sirchtruth]

So apropos using either word.

[Mashood]

“Be careful what you wish for.”

Preibus, Walker, and Ryan and still couldn’t carry the state. GO STEELE!

[Nifster]

If she wants it sure that works for me

[itsahoot]

I’d have to disagree. I’d say putting Michael Steele back in charge would have been far, far worse than Priebus.

Not about either one of them, I said the outcome could not have been worse. Nothing good came from this election, they let us keep the house to be later used as the fall guy for any and all failures.