Petraeus’s Bathsheba Syndrome - Why did a man we so respected succumb to temptation?

General David Petraeus is arguably the most consequential and renowned American military leader since World War II. His resignation because of an extramarital affair with his biographer, Paula Broadwell, has shocked Americans. L’affaire Petraeus has two parts that must be separated: his sexual relationship with Broadwell itself, and the link between the timing of the announcement of his resignation and the Benghazi attacks on September 11.

Here I will focus on the former. What led a successful general at the height of his power and influence to have an affair that undid all he had accomplished?

In 1993, Dean Ludwig and Clinton Longnecker co-authored an article for The Journal of Business Ethics titled “The Bathsheba Syndrome: The Ethical Failure of Successful Leaders.”(PDF) The name of their piece comes, of course, from the biblical story of King David and Bathsheba, recounted in the Second Book of Samuel. David seduces Bathsheba, the wife of Uriah the Hittite, and impregnates her. He later orders that Uriah be placed in the front ranks of the fighting, where Uriah is killed. Upon word of his death, David marries Bathsheba. God is displeased and sends the prophet Nathan to rebuke the king, who repents but is nonetheless punished by the death of his and Bathsheba’s child, and by the later civil war arising from the insurrection Absalom (David’s beloved third son) leads against Solomon (the second son of David and Bathsheba).

Ludwig and Longnecker, as well as others writing subsequently, have argued that the psychological impact of gaining power, despite many positive effects, also may unleash a dark side: the belief that one is too big to fail, that the normal rules do not apply. Thus even a leader of high moral character may succumb to the temptations that accompany the acquisition of power. The findings of Ludwig and Longnecker regarding the moral corruption of the powerful go a long way toward explaining Petraeus’s behavior.

For one, they argue that moral principles are more often abandoned in the wake of success than as a result of competitive pressure. Success tends to inflate a leader’s belief that he has a special personal ability to manipulate or control outcomes, an issue that particularly seems to have applied to Petraeus.

The general clearly seemed to believe that he could control the consequences of his sexual liaison with Broadwell, his biographer. I reviewed her book All In: The Education of General David Petraeus for Foreign Affairs, and wrote that the book portrayed Petraeus as the modern exemplar of the soldier-scholar-statesman. “The Petraeus that emerges from Broadwell’s book,” I wrote, “is educated, committed, competitive, driven, and inspiring.” I noted Broadwell’s “extensive access to the general and his subordinates over a prolonged period” but concluded that All In had avoided the “pitfall of hagiography.” In retrospect, I was wrong.

Not all Davids who fall prey to the Bathsheba syndrome have an actual Bathsheba, but Petraeus did. Although I absolved her of hagiography, it seemed clear that Broadwell, a West Point graduate and Army reserve officer with an M.A. from the University of Denver and an M.P.A. from Harvard, was in awe of Petraeus. Twenty years younger than the general, Broadwell is a very attractive married mother of two young children, but her appeal to Petraeus no doubt went beyond mere sex.

As we are now discovering, many of Petraeus’s closest advisers were very concerned about the “extensive access” that Broadwell had to the general. Many of those individuals may well bear some of the responsibility for the situation that has ensued. The Bathsheba syndrome is usually enabled by a phalanx of loyalists and operatives willing to defend the leader at any cost. The leader thus may come to believe that he is somehow invulnerable, allowing his passions and sensual desires to tyrannize over his reason and good judgment.

This was certainly the case with, say, Bill Clinton. Although General Petraeus has always seemed to possess a moral fiber absent in the case of the former president, he too may have felt that he would be protected by his loyal subordinates. That is the fate of a man who succumbs to the Bathsheba syndrome.

— Mackubin Thomas Owens is a professor of national-security affairs at the Naval War College in Newport, a senior fellow at the Foreign Policy Research Institute, and the editor of Orbis. He is a Marine infantry veteran of Vietnam.

Then why did you misrepresent what I said? I never said he was excused because his wife aged and doesn’t look like Ann Romney. So you lied again. You are fine with the flat truth period until your emotions override your intellect.

Let’s draw an analogy: I leave the keys in my running car for a few minutes downtown. Surprise! Somebody stole my car. I shouldn’t have done that, but the thief is not excused under the law of Heaven or my state.

Holly Petraeus allowed her appearance to go by gaining weight and being a fashion disaster, when it appears that those things are important to her husband (left her keys in the running car). It did not give him the right to cheat on her (steal the car). It did make her husband an easier mark for a Paula Broadwell. The analogy isn’t perfect, because the car can’t be culpable, but the point is there. If you can’t see that, you can’t deal with “the flat truth period” bub. Blame Adam and Eve or Satan, because that’s the fallen world we live in.

I agree, it is impossible to tell what happened. He could have drawn a line many times, we just don’t know.

Way back, I saw this exact scenario play out, with a muscular woman who had Broadwell’s exact eyes, and a much older friend who loved his wife, but couldn’t hold alcohol. She was a climber, and it was pretty clear that acquiring this married guy was good for her, and so she decided she wanted it. Just like a business decision.

Her tool of choice was alcohol, and she applied it like a pro, getting what she wanted by getting the guy drunk and alone. Looking back, finding out about all of it was my first indication that some women can be almost sociopathic in pursuit of objectives. At the time I assumed they were all emotional and illogical, carried about on waves of whimsy, and occaisionally psychosis (I was in my late teens/early twenties at the time).

As guys we think of this as arising from subconscious urges/emotions/desires. I think with “striving” women, it is more of a conscious decision that this is what she wants, and an intellectual problem she solves in a stepwise pattern, probably viewing men as stupid tools, to be manipulated with ease. Later it is back-reasoned as love/emotion/destiny, etc, at least with these climbers.

I’m sure from Petraeus’ side, fitness played a role, wanting to be younger, dopamine desensitization upregulating sex drive, maybe even his leftist wife all played roles. But I think it’s a mistake to not factor in how mechanistic female strivers can be in pursuit of what they decide they want, and how helpless a guy with alcohol sensitivity is.

My guess is she smuggled in a bottle of something special, and said, “Let’s celebrate with a drink!” after some impressive accomplishment/milestone of his. Tough in a dry warzone to turn down a top shelf Scotch with a friend after a big win. And once one super-smooth single malt is down, it’s easy to go to two, two to three, and three to four or more, marveling at the flavor. If you’re a small guy who can’t handle alcohol and maintain control, anything can happen, and if anything is the striver’s plan, you are screwed.

As my buddy found out, it’s like the mob. Once you’re in, there is no easy way out. Especially once psycho-girl decides you are the only ticket she wants, and she isn’t going to give up on all her hard work and careful planning easily. That is the strange part of it though.

The fact she was hate-E-mailing women other than the wife makes me wonder why she didn’t view the wife as the primary threat, and work harder to split them up first. Either she and Petraeus had a long term arangement, of which the wife was an unwitting part, or she felt the marriage was doomed, and it was just a matter of time.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.