YES!
I hope he lives long enough to testify.
Under oath?
They will get nothing from him of any substance.
Sadly in all of this muck the preventable murders of four Americans no longer matters. 
I have a feeling that when Petraeus goes before congress he will say it was the video that sparked the raid just to protect his pension because Barry Hussein Soetoro could ruin him financially.
“There are so many amendments to this Constitution . . . which one should I choose? I choose the FIF!” - Tron Carter
When ?
I just overheard a doctor where I work saying that Patreous is nothing but a Republican toady. The only one Obama could get in the office because of Republican opposition to his better choices. Don’t expect the left to give credence to anything he says.
I want to believe Patraeus is an honorable man with human failings. I want to believe that, having tarnished his honor, he will seek to restore what dignity he can by spilling ALL the beans on Obamalini.
If he did, then I could certainly forgive him for being human and I would gladly acknowledge that, at his core, he truly is an honorable man who made a horrible mistake. He will suffer the rest of his life, but people could say, “...at least he did the right thing in the end.”
One can only hope.
Barack Obama decapitated David Petraeus. America’s finest? No match. The media is holding up his bloody head.
R.I.P. Ty Woods, Glen Doherty, Sean Smith, Chris Stevens. They’re pissing on your graves.
Now...where’s that guy that made the video that caused all this?
3-dimensional chess vs. tiddly winks BUMP!
Already discredited, Dave.
Thanks for your service on the physical battlefield.
Two possibilities:
1-Petraeus tells the truth and lets the chips fall.
Now that he admitted to the affair, creating what he had to know would be tremendous personal loss, I can’t see the General fearing Obama any more.
There may even be some personal animosity, probably not so much from the affair, but for the fact that so many young men have perished for no reason, once Obama decided to announce the departure date for Afghanistan, and changed the rules of engagement. He’s a flawed man, but he is a soldier.
2-Petraeus is privy to Benghazi’s real purpose, believed in the righteousness of arming the Syrian opposition, and will protect secrets for reasons of national security.
Petraeus seems to have taken the Ambassador’s death personally. He made a personal visit to Benghazi after the attack. He could reveal some things about the attack that would not compromise national security, in particular whether he actually felt a video had precipitated the attack, or not.
Either way, I think Obama should worry about the General’s testimony.
Here’s my take on this....pay attention, my plot changes by the hour.
I think it was arranged, probably by Val Jarrett, to place two valuable Libyan prisoners in custody in the CIA annex near the consulate in Benghazi.
A faux riot would be started and a Utube video was found to cast the blame. In the ensuing riot, the prisoners would be taken from their prison, exchange made, huge payment given to the Obama re-election campaign.
I don’t know why these prisoners in my scenario would be so valuable but with more thought there could be reasons.
Only the “riot” was taken over by an Al Queda attack so the group assigned to abscond with the valuable Libyan prisoners got swept into the consulate. At some point the annex was aqccessed but about 30/40 people had been removed from the CIA annex by that time. I don’t think there ever was a prison exchange but hey, allegedly “Libyan authorities” removed embassy employees....so maybe this planned prisoner exchange happened.
I sure don’t think it was part of the plan for the ambassador and those security guys to get killed. But after the deed was done might as well stick to the original script because mission was accomplished, just got to get around that bit about dead people and such.
Obviously the regime lied to the American people, of course they did, quit debating that point already and move on. The American people, in a fashion, spoke last week and either this whole sad episode was not in their radar but they don’t mind being lied to so long as it about things far away and not much import to yon average joe.
The question here, first I think that entire operation was done WITHOUT the knowledge of the CIA...come on, Holder calls up a couple of guys, they get a hold of a couple Libyan yahoos....it’s a done deal....five million for the re-election campaign, we’ll work on the State Dept and CIA later.
The CIA is pissed and I’m thinking also the State dept. I am so not sure that this was supposed to happen. I think the CIA and State knew it was a terror attack and were prepared to deal with it as suc h. UNTIL the admin called them and said this is how we’re playing the story.
An election coming up....yada, yada....we’ll get to the bottom of it later.
And of course they’re flipping congress the bird. Question here is, will congress, Dems and pubs, get insulted enough at this, do they care enough to knowingly allow an administration to continue endangering this country...do they have children, grandchildren? ....pride?
This is just so serious and I’m not convinced these defeated pubs have what it takes to get through it.
I desperately want to be wrong.
What will they do when Eric Holder’s presidential campaign needs some cash?
And we’ve no opposition party with gonads.
Scary.
This will serve to give the adoring press their talking points that will help diffuse the entire Benghazi narrative making it palatable to the public with a logical sounding scenario.
I hope he IMPLICATES 0bama!
I think he better testify on his personal affiars before Libya.