Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rightwingintelligentsia; annieokie; penelopesire; maggief; Protect the Bill of Rights; thouworm; ...
She NEVER said they had a secret prison. That was some butthole reporter's take on what she said, which was nothing more than we already knew.
Furthermore, this is really starting to pi$$ me off. Why are they trying so hard to destroy this woman? Something about this whole thing is just too far out of the realm of reason. They are trying to make a sympathetic figure out of petraeus and using every derogatory adjective they can think of for Paula Broadwell, and the more they do, the worse he looks. /rant

Anyone wanting on or off this ping list, please advise.


Benghazi Index

23 posted on 11/12/2012 8:05:46 AM PST by MestaMachine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: MestaMachine

Affair or not, Broadwell is not a stupid woman. She knows the world of intel and security. That is why they want her destroyed.

BTW: I cannot believe the number of commentators who agree Petraeus needs time to get his life back together. I want to hear someone say “Too bad, so sad. Tell us what you know and then you can sink into oblivion.”


25 posted on 11/12/2012 8:14:04 AM PST by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: MestaMachine
Why are they trying so hard to destroy this woman?

First it was about a video and they imprisoned the creator of the video. Destroying people is not something they worry about.

Now the video story has fallen apart (but that guy is still in jail) and congress is getting ready for hearings that will surely get headlines. Obama needs those headlines to be about something other than incompetence or worse. So a sordid affair between the CIA director and a "crazy" woman fits the bill nicely. Lots of headlines now about her, about her e-mails, about how nuts she is, about Petraeus lack of judgement.

And from now forward, anything she says will be viewed as the ravings of a lunatic. Anything Petraeus says will be viewed as self-serving attempts to shift blame for his own dreadful lack of judgement. That is if he ever says anything, which now looks doubtful.

That's why you destry this woman if you're Obama and his propaganda media.

27 posted on 11/12/2012 8:22:06 AM PST by pepsi_junkie (Who is John Galt?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: MestaMachine

Put me on your Benghazi ping list ASAP. I totally agree that Broadwell is another smokescreen. Petraeus resigning - smokescreen. Holder resigning - F&F smokescreen.

Very soon, the idiots that voted for a second term will need to start speaking out or nothing truthful will ever be heard for the next four years.


30 posted on 11/12/2012 8:29:50 AM PST by Eagle of Liberty (We the People are coming!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: MestaMachine
She NEVER said they had a secret prison. That was some butthole reporter's take on what she said, ...

Well put! ;-) ROTFLOL

46 posted on 11/12/2012 12:31:23 PM PST by TigersEye (Who is John Galt?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson