Posted on 11/11/2012 7:14:16 PM PST by dinoparty
So here is a bizarre twist in the David Petraeus resignation saga.
Paula Broadwell, the biographer revealed as the woman having a secret affair with the now-former CIA director, gave a talk at the University of Denver on Oct. 26 in which she appeared to reveal sensitive, maybe even classified, information about the Sept. 11 attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi.
The most interesting revelation is her claim that the CIA was holding two Libyan militia members prisoner, which may have prompted the attack. (Though she also sought to explain the Obama administration's initial view that the attack was linked to the YouTube video Innocence of Muslims, an anti-Islam polemic that sparked riots across the Muslim world.)
(Excerpt) Read more at blog.foreignpolicy.com ...
Will the Administration need to admit that in addition to their lies about what they knew and when they knew it that The US did in fact have boots on the ground?
One possible explanation; we think of it as one event, but in fact there were more like two discrete attacks separated by a lull of some FOUR HOURS.
It’s true that they did take some attackers prisoner in the first attack on the Consulate, and that those guys had been relocated to the Annex, i.e., “The Farm”.
So I think it’s possible she is referring to those guys? She might be suggesting that the motive for the follow-up attack on the annex was motivated by a desire on the part of the comrades of the prisoners to free them from the annex...?
Or perhaps there had been other prisoners there already...?
Http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mNKRKHv742Y&feature=youtube_gdata_player
Video of one of the prisoners there (hands bound).
Not that it was a huge force, but they did say two military personnel came with the force from Tripoli. There were at least two military in Libya.
We are witnessing the metamorphoses of the new Amerika, accountability is no longer part of the process for anyone in the government.
I posted this link on another thread...this blog is written by a former intel officer; he published his piece about 90 minutes before the guy at Foreign Policy and goes a step further; according to the “formerspook,” the “in-extremis force was the unit that Gen Carter Ham (AFRICOM/CC) wanted to send to Benghazi, but was reportedly over-ruled by officials in DC. And a few weeks later, Ham’s replacement at AFRICOM was announced by none other than Leon Panetta. Ham is retiring months ahead of schedule; just a coincidence, I’m sure:
http://formerspook.blogspot.com/2012/11/who-knew-petraeus-scandal-edition.html
I remember hearing that the X-Seals had taken a couple of Libyan’s as prisoners but were forced to release them to the Libyan Government. Who gave the orders to release them?
I also remember reading that the Brits gave all of their arsenal of weapons to our Consulate when they left Benghazi.
Broadwell: Petraeus Knew of Benghazi Plea for Help (Classified pillow talk?)
Could there be another possibility ... that the investigation was not “official” but was instead being conducted by some rogue FBI individuals ... because the President and DOJ were actually potential targets of the investigation?
if we’re gonna impeach this puke for Benghazi, let’s get him on the phony citizenship, too. I’m almost 65, & I don’t need all this menus ha crap. sticky
Ping.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/19/world/africa/suspect-in-benghazi-attack-scoffs-at-us.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
we’ve got a sh*tload of contradictions to cut through, and it’s not going to be borin’, in the mornin’. R we havin’ fun yet? It’s not worth sh*t unless we’re havin’ fun.
The movie Matrix is close to describing the alternate universe they are creating.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.