Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Marco Rubio Heads to Iowa. 2016 Starting Already?
ABC News ^ | Nov 8, 2012 1:45pm | By Shushannah Walshe

Posted on 11/08/2012 4:43:09 PM PST by drewh

Florida Senator Marco Rubio is heading to the first caucus state of Iowa on Nov. 17 to headline an annual campaign fundraising birthday party for Iowa governor Terry Branstad.

Last year all the presidential hopefuls, except for Mitt Romney, came to the party to court the governor and Iowa political dignitaries who attended the bash.

The governor’s spokesperson, Tim Albrecht, a caucus expert himself, told ABC News that Branstad invited Rubio and is “excited he accepted.”

“Sen. Rubio is a star within our party,” Albrecht said. “We were excited Sen. Rubio accepted, and regardless of what happened on Tuesday he was going to come, and it guarantees a successful fundraiser.”

And as for the assumption that this means Rubio is a sure thing for a 2016 presidential bid? Albrecht said the speculation is one of the bonuses of living in the Hawkeye state and he knows Rubio will be a “major draw.”

“I’m sure people will speculate regardless, and if Gov. Romney had won people would speculate about 2020,” Albrecht said. “When you live in Iowa you’re under a microscope.”

Of course the speculation can’t hurt Rubio, or Iowa’s hopes for remaining the first state where voters get to pick a president. Albrecht said they were of course “hoping the (caucus process) would start 6 years from now.”

“But, we expect Iowa to be first once again and Gov. Branstad welcomes any candidates that might be looking ahead to the Iowa caucuses,” Albrecht said.

(Excerpt) Read more at abcnews.go.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Florida; US: Iowa
KEYWORDS: florida; iowa; marcorubio; terrybranstad; timalbrecht
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last
To: liberalh8ter

Dear God -here we go again. No one is pure enough for some of you. We might as well just stop voting and allow the Demons to have it all with attitudes like this.

Right now - I’d take Rubio over this POS who just stole this election. The rest of you can sit here and whine and whimper that he isn’t pure enough, but he’d sure be a helluva lot better than what we now have.

Some of you are beyond help.


41 posted on 11/08/2012 6:08:57 PM PST by Catsrus (WANT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: drewh
Another neocon Bushy! Just what we need! Unless we can talk Bob Dole out of retirement.
42 posted on 11/08/2012 6:25:49 PM PST by Forgotten Amendments (Democracy = Communism on the installment plan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dalebert

But the nitpickers will find fault and will find he’s not perfect so we throw him away waiting for Mr. or Mrs. Perfect. We must stop this and become united to destroy Democrats—not each other.


43 posted on 11/08/2012 6:29:21 PM PST by Conservativegreatgrandma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Conservativegreatgrandma

Yes, our FRiends demand purity and perfection from our candidate or they’ll stay home and teach everyone a lesson again. Unfortunately, if you ask 10 of our FRiends to define this purity and perfection you’ll get 10 different answers.


44 posted on 11/08/2012 6:40:36 PM PST by Mr Fuji
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Mr Fuji

Exactly. Too many judge a candidate against their idea of perfection when we’re to be judging one candidate against another. We cannot continue to do this. We need everyone of us to hold together. Obama is arguably the worst president we’ve ever had and he’s in the process of destroying this country, yet we have many who refused to support Romney because he’s not perfect enough. God help America. We are not using the brains God gave us. We refuse to use logic but use emotion.


45 posted on 11/08/2012 6:46:16 PM PST by Conservativegreatgrandma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: drewh

Why do some of you equate having a hispanic candidate with pandering? IMO, the benefit of a hispanic candidate is just to get hispanics’ attention and get them to actually listen to the conservative message. As long as the person is a solid conservative, what is the problem?


46 posted on 11/08/2012 6:58:00 PM PST by mtrott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
I'm amazed that such a easily predictable outcome, with plenty of empirical evidence to support it, is missed by so many republicans.

Heads in rectal defilade.

47 posted on 11/08/2012 7:26:02 PM PST by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: drewh
I hope he will stick to his CONSERVATIVE ROOTS, if not -- we don't need another flip flopper.

That said, he hasn't flip-flopped yet, so I am hoping for a Rubio/Jindal, Rubio/Cruz or a Rubio/West ticket!!

Comments??

48 posted on 11/08/2012 7:36:57 PM PST by ExCTCitizen (More Republicans stayed home then the margin of victory of O's Win...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drewh

Don’t any of these people have real work to do? All politicians seem to do is fly around and campaign all the time. Well, Obama takes lavish vacations and plays a lot of golf, but still there’s no real work there. Who knew that being president or a senator was so easy?


49 posted on 11/08/2012 7:40:40 PM PST by Pining_4_TX ( The state is the great fiction by which everybody seeks to live at the expense of everybody else. ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drewh

He should have been the VP candidate this year. That would have given him a running start for 2020.

Team Willard goes for a VP who can’t even carry his own state (of course Willard couldn’t carry any of his “three” home states).


50 posted on 11/08/2012 8:06:36 PM PST by CriticalJ (Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress.. But then I repeat myself. MT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: garjog

If the GOP nominates Rubio it will make my decision easier. I have no use for a political party that goes whoring after ethnic votes, especially for a group that has no interest in assimilating or respecting our laws. To hell with Rubio.


51 posted on 11/08/2012 8:15:15 PM PST by Pelham (America, 1775-2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike

“One just has to peel away the veil of Marco Rubio to revealed who is backing him and what he actually believes beyond the beautiful conservative rhetoric he sprouts.”

He’s Jeb Bush’s sock puppet.


52 posted on 11/08/2012 8:19:23 PM PST by Pelham (America, 1775-2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: LibertarianLiz

The Republicans have to go after some special group. It could be the dead folks who vote, the college grads with $75k in debt, the environmentalists, women who needs lots of birth control, or Latinos. From the list, I’d say we are better off with the Latinos...at least they want to work, pay taxes, and get ahead in life. The rest of the special interest groups are all losers.

For you dead folks who vote....I didn’t mean any harsh criticism....but it’s not like you are going to pay any additional taxes or social security.


53 posted on 11/09/2012 3:18:32 AM PST by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Catsrus
Why invoke God's name when you're advocating the compromising of principals in order to achieve your goal? Are we not commanded to obey the laws of our government? Instead, you want to reward the lawbreakers to gain their vote (which will never happen as it's the freebies the Latinos want - not amnesty). How about the murderer and rapist vote? Shall we pardon them to gain their loyalty, as well?
54 posted on 11/09/2012 3:36:20 AM PST by liberalh8ter (If Barack has a memory like a steel trap, why can't he remember what the Constitution says?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: drewh; mickie
The GOP could put Simon Bolivar himself up as a presidential candidate but the majority of Latinos in this country will still vote Democrat.

Pandering will not make one dent in the Hispanic gimme voting bloc.

Candidates like Rubio will be looked upon as a Tio Tomas just as black GOP leaders like Clarence Thomas, Col. West, Michael Steele, Condi Rice, Herman Cain, etal, will always be looked at as Uncle Toms by the black bloc majority.

We should not be so quick to cast about for a "winner" without realizing that the millions of South and Central American immigrants are more likely to listen to La Raza before voting than to any conservative GOP endorsers.

However, Rubio's votes, leadership and speeches in the Senate during the next term will get honest evaluation by me and probably countless others, but not through the prism of ethnicity.

Leni

55 posted on 11/09/2012 4:18:44 AM PST by MinuteGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drewh

Well, well, well. Now that George P. Bush is also making noises about running we in for some real fun, the battle of the GOP latinos for the title. Who’s the softest on illegal immigration.

Only chance for either to make inroads garnering the hispanic vote is to start staging Mexican wrestling matches. Yeah, that’s the ticket.


56 posted on 11/09/2012 4:46:45 AM PST by Covenantor ("Men are ruled...by liars who refuse them news, and by fools who cannot govern." Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Conservativegreatgrandma

its over..they own the machines...cant top that


57 posted on 11/09/2012 5:05:17 AM PST by dalebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: drewh

Ref. #6.

I am not going to waste my time arguing with stupidity.

Educate yourself...Do some reading. This is to include Chester Arthur about which you are so ignorant.


58 posted on 11/09/2012 5:20:57 AM PST by GatĂșn(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: liberalh8ter

It doesn’t matter at this point. We’re screwed whoever wins. Obey our laws? Since when did this administration care about obeying laws?

Shove your puritanical views.


59 posted on 11/09/2012 8:15:51 AM PST by Catsrus (WANT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: drewh
Between him and Bobby Jindal, that's our future. I'm not so worried about another Obama term with one exception: The Supreme Court.
60 posted on 11/09/2012 8:54:51 AM PST by ExSoldier (Stand up and be counted... OR LINE UP AND BE NUMBERED...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson