Posted on 11/06/2012 2:04:52 AM PST by Libloather
There’s flexibility and there’s accommodation. Maybe Obama wants to offer the Soviets a base in Florida. Much more convenient than Cuba.
Strange, because I heard that the U.S. Navy sent the fleet in Norfolk out to sea to avoid Sandy. Ships at anchorage bang into things.
Absurd and silly election time exageration. We are not at war with Russia. 200 miles is international waters. It was a friendly gesture and would be expected to be reciprocated. If a US sub was off the coast of Russia and they refused safe harbor and there was an accident what would we say? By calling it an “attack sub” it is made to sound incendiary, but it isn’t.
I'd expect that the last place you'd go in a nuc boat is into ANY harbor during a storm and especially a harbor full of potential adversaries with cameras and other surveillance equipment. Assuming this isn't a wholesale fabrication, was it possible to get a hotel room in Jacksonville, or did the intelligence agencies have them booked solid?
I imagine it sailing away again covered in everything from graffiti to hull-attached transponders and trailing a bunch of tin cans on strings- the naval equivalent of falling asleep drunk at a rowdy frat party. :-)
Nuclear subs travel so far beneath the sea’s storm surges that they do not have to “port” in any storm.
This article is CRAP. If the sub ported, it certainly was not because of hurrican Sandy.
Nuclear subs travel so far beneath the sea’s storm surges that they do not have to “port” in any storm.
This article is CRAP. If the sub ported, it certainly was not because of hurricane Sandy.
Exactly. Since when do subs, which can DIVE, need to be protected from hurricanes?
Nuclear powered attack submarines have no need to surface into the middle of a hurricane, unless thunseaworthy about them. So, why would a Russian nuclear powered attack submarine need a safe harbor in a U.S. port unless the boat was in distress?
Subs go way down in the ocean, and again I imagine there's not that much hurricane activity (I'm sure there's some .. ) a thousand or more feet below the surface, soooo .. why does it need a safe harbor ?
By what method did we deem it 'safe' and allow it safe harbor ?
So now we have a Russian attack sub, tricked out for war .. invited into the house after they rang the bell and said, "trick or treat"
?????
It is an attack sub, meant to attack other subs and ships, as opposed to a missile boomer. It’s not intended to be incendiary, just descriptive. Attacking things is what warships do and submarines are definitely at the pointy end of the spear.
There are protocols about the distance missile boomers are supposed to keep off shore, a gentleman’s agreement. Their isn’t any evidence that they were in distress. When a Russian freighter was in Boston Harbor, we were not allowed to test certain waveforms for a Navy radar at a land site twenty five miles away. Every Russian ship is an intelligence platform.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2955363/posts
http://freebeacon.com/russian-subs-skirt-coast/
for cross reference
Ridiculous! Subs go under the water for safe refuge in storm. What a bunch of socially promoted, naive, pretenders in DC to allow this move.
Really, in a world of suicide bombings what exactly stops the sub from launching on DC to achieve victory by mugging. MAD? I wouldn’t trust that doctrine anymore with this commie sympathizing Potemkin President and his czars pulling strings.
‘Hunt for Red October’ or Target Practice?
We have an Islamic radical in the White House and Russia can’t trust him!
>>Nuclear subs travel so far beneath the sea’s storm surges that they do not have to “port” in any storm.
I sailed very smoothly under quite a few storms in my submarining days. Since subs have round bottom, the last place they want be in a storm is on the surface or in port. There is definitely more to this.
Election monitors. Everyone else seems to think it’s OK to stick their nose into our elections.
Maybe Putin wanted to see what he was getting for his money to support Hussein’s re-election.
The search function doesn’t work for me right now. I gave it an honest shot.
Any thoughts about what it could be?
I have a bad feeling about Obama’s lame-duck period. The Clintons trashed the White House before leaving, but I’m afraid Obama will trash a lot more.
If you read the other articles, the claim is that a Russian AGI (Intelligence ship)
was given safe harbor, NOT the submarine.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.