Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Damn, I hope Mitt's people are feeding this information as just a WEE bit off...and they're really 3 or 4 up.

What say you prognosticators who think Mitt is going to win Ohio by more than 1 point? Is he feeding them only "day of" election polls and not the internals on early voting??

1 posted on 11/05/2012 1:19:29 PM PST by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SoFloFreeper
Damn, I hope Mitt's people are feeding this information as just a WEE bit off...and they're really 3 or 4 up. What say you prognosticators who think Mitt is going to win Ohio by more than 1 point? Is he feeding them only "day of" election polls and not the internals on early voting??

Just a thought. If I wanted to radiate confidence, while ensuring my maximum turnout, no matter how far ahead I was, I would say it's just a point -- or tied.

2 posted on 11/05/2012 1:24:16 PM PST by Gulf War One
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper
Romney has the momentum! You shouldn't vote for Obama Ohio!
3 posted on 11/05/2012 1:24:18 PM PST by icwhatudo (Low taxes and less spending in Sodom and Gomorrah is not my idea of a conservative victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper

what about FL?

We need VA, FL, OH , CO

Notice how the media ignore the states obama will lose, like NC, IN


4 posted on 11/05/2012 1:25:51 PM PST by manc (Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper

I suspect they’re up considerably more.

Karl Rove kind of let the “close poll” strategy slip this morning when he mentioned that close polls are a better campaign tool than big leads. It also makes plenty for pundits and media to talk about.


5 posted on 11/05/2012 1:28:35 PM PST by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper
My prediction, 100% guaranteed: ANYTHING Newhouse has "leaked" to the press is coming directly from Romney's campaign staff or Romney himself, and has ONLY a coincidental relationship to whatever his actual numbers say.
7 posted on 11/05/2012 1:31:24 PM PST by FredZarguna ("Post Hoc, ergo propter hoc," is no way to reason through life, son.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper

I think clearly the Romney strategy has always been an election day turnout one.

The media, for reasons known, are distorting the early voting stats, and polls.

On the former, they are most certainly wrong, and any amateur internet user can find comparative stats to show in most states Dem turnout is sharply down and Republican sharply up. It is simply a fact, although that is based on party registration.

If the Republican base turnout, and the Reagan Democrat switch overs are anything like most of us suspect, then it is going to be a strong Romney victory.

Obviously, I’m not an American voter, so I can only watch nervously from the sidelines waiting for the Conservatives to save the world from the Obama catastrophe.

If a few good freepers and others drag a few extra souls to the polls, it will be a good night tomorrow!


9 posted on 11/05/2012 1:32:50 PM PST by UKrepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper

I don’t care if he wins by 1 SINGLE vote as long as we get the current lying scumbag MARXIST out!


12 posted on 11/05/2012 1:38:34 PM PST by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal The 16th Amendment!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper

probably is but wanto make sure base goes out and vote so they lowball the number.

Side note, it seems like the problem with FR is fixed as everything is faster and don’t time out anymore.


13 posted on 11/05/2012 1:39:48 PM PST by scbison
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper

Historically, republican presidential candidates tend to do a couple of points better in Ohio than they do nationwide. Just check the PVI there. When all is said and done this race won’t even be close. PA, WI, MI and MN are the states you should keep an eye on.


17 posted on 11/05/2012 1:45:11 PM PST by BarnacleCenturion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper

These numbers are a prop, one way or the other. Personally I believe there is probably a passable margin in the “real” Ohio internal data and that Pennsylvania and Wisconsin numbers are closer to legit. There is simply no way that Pa and Wis are tied AND Ohio that close. The numbers release is a turnout driver and also a goading of the Obama campaign to come forward with “something”


19 posted on 11/05/2012 1:51:18 PM PST by johncocktoasten (Practicing asymetrical thread warfare against anti-Palin Trolls)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper

Perhaps they’re factoring in 0bama’s voter fraud. Would be a realistic thing to do, actually. I am VERY impressed with how Romney has handled this campaign. God Bless America, and please God SAVE US FROM EVIL ON NOV. 6TH!!!!!


21 posted on 11/05/2012 1:54:10 PM PST by Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper

Central ohio..........the people I have talked to, those who have early voted, say the lines are spectacular. Long, long waits.


25 posted on 11/05/2012 2:00:50 PM PST by Toespi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper

Oh yeah, we’re getting the straight scoop, sure, whatever...

THere is a reason why they are “internal” numbers.

This is a leak, bs, meant to drive voters to show up. Both parties and the media do it.

Obama, if it was this close, would not have that obvious negative attitude, while Romney is bouncing around and whistling. If this was close, Romney would be making a bigger deal, about some more controversial issues like Benghazi.

I’ll say this, if the race is as close as they make it sound, which I don’t believe, then Romney has run a pretty poor campaign for the last couple weeks. I mean, who the hell would run prevent defense when you are slightly behind?

And we all know, that a tie goes to the Dems every time...


26 posted on 11/05/2012 2:03:14 PM PST by Professional
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper

ON NOV. 7TH MORNING RETURNS TO AMERICA: IN THE END, RIGHT TRIUMPHS

VICE PRESIDENT RYAN

30 posted on 11/05/2012 2:37:51 PM PST by jimsin (w)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper

BS
Why would they release their internal polls?
Just because it’s in print does not make it true.


31 posted on 11/05/2012 3:00:37 PM PST by CincyRichieRich (Keep your head up and keep moving forward!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper

Here is the White Elephant - while a GOP pollster may get the party split right and not over sample RATs, there will be no more reason for a person to speak to that pollster anymore than one from Gallup, Pew.

So we are still not hearing from the 91-97% of the people who won’t even talk to the pollsters.

They don’t know that this pollster is working for the campaign.


32 posted on 11/05/2012 3:45:14 PM PST by arrogantsob (The Disaster MUST Go. Sarah herself supports Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson