Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I was watching and listening to a former Marine on Greta tonight give his opinion on the Benghazi debacle and I just reached the point where I have had enough. The bottom line is that I think it is disgraceful that Romney has not addressed the Benghazi scandal over the last week, particularly as more and more damning information has come out on a daily basis.

The Marine who was on tonight essentially said that men & women in uniform everywhere believe that the fundamental tenet that our service people never leave anyone behind is under attack.

I understand that Romney is pursing what he believes is the best strategy to win, and he probably believes that talking about Benghazi introduces an element of risk that just isn't necessary at this point. He thinks he has it wrapped up. But, given the the seriousness of Obama's malfeasance, I believe that in order for Romney to behave with integrity and as a leader he must, at the bare minimum, let the people know that he understands the gravity of the situation and at least ask some very pointed and relevant questions. This situation demands it.

I defended Romney's liberal policies and actions in Mass. because I said he had to "go along to get along" in such a liberal state. But even when I said it what bothered me most about it is that we have someone who perhaps compromises his principles in order to get what he wants/needs. Now would be an excellent time, Mr. Romney, to demonstrate to conservatives and those in uniform that you will stand up for what is right regardless the consequences.

1 posted on 11/01/2012 8:17:08 PM PDT by PAR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last
To: PAR

Romney is clearly dodging the issue. He thinks the economy will win him the election and other stuff are distractions. Plus he shot too soon and drew MSM attention to himself and now is gunshy.

If he loses he will look like just another stupid AH like McCain was.


2 posted on 11/01/2012 8:22:08 PM PDT by sickoflibs (Romney is still a liberal. Just watch him. (Obama-ney Care ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PAR
Although I sort of feel the same way, I think it's obvious what Romney is doing. Romney's number one goal is to avoid looking like a scary rightwing extremist who says crazy stuff. The media is salivating at the thought that Romney might make some kind of comment that could be interpreted as scary rightwing extremist crazy talk.

The last thing Romney needs is the weekend before the election to be filled with media reports that he has made "wild, reckless, baseless" claims that the Obama administration was somehow running guns to Islamic terrorists and committing treason against this country. News like that might make a lot of Independents say "What a loon! I'm not voting for that guy! He's a nut!"

3 posted on 11/01/2012 8:22:46 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy (Global Warming is a religion, and I don't want to be taxed to pay for a faith that is not mine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PAR

This is the third or fourth post I’ve answered regarding this. People are NOT thinking about what is involved here: CIA, intelligence, security, etc. This isn’t about Mitt, as another person mentioned on the OTHER “Mitt should speak out thread.” IF Mitt were to say anything the MSM would make Benghazi about the political race. This is more than that. Heroes died. They need to be vindicated.

Mitt has most likely been privy to intelligence briefings so anything he says might not be okay for speaking outloud. The info may have not been declassified yet.

We should know better...we complain about security leaks by Dems and then want Mitt to do the same.


4 posted on 11/01/2012 8:23:21 PM PDT by madison10 (I love it when a plan comes together ~~God)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PAR

It’s not that Romney doesn’t care or think that the Bengazi story is a huge scandal. It’s just that 90 percent of voters know so little of it (thanks to an absentee media) that it won’t resonate like the focus on the economy. Sad to say, but it probably didn’t test well with focus groups, and at this point, he’s better of expending time and energy on what has worked and continues to work. I can’t wait to evict Obama.


5 posted on 11/01/2012 8:25:44 PM PDT by festusbanjo (Romney has run a business, a state, and an Olympics. Obama has never run anything but his mouth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PAR

It won’t do his chances any good, and it will not bring anyone back to life. The moment he says something there will be two possible risks that those that only follow big media will see-
1) Romney is giving away secrets from his briefings - even if it is stuff available on any media outlet, if it is also stuff he was told in a meeting the press will ask for conservative outrage that they show when they claim Obama can’t keep a secret.
2) going back to the ‘leaks’. You know there is a great chance for an Obama positive ‘leak’ that refutes Romney simply because it is supposed to be a secret therefore the White House will neither confirm nor deny it and no one will be able to verify it.
Right now its a no win from Romney’s position.


6 posted on 11/01/2012 8:26:21 PM PDT by HenryArmitage (it was not meant that we should voyage far.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PAR

I repeat, the most farcical thing I have seen in my 61 years on this Earth is the journalism community castigating Romney for not doing their job. Romney has been getting briefed on National Security matters and has to walk a very fine line here. He can not reveal briefing material because he has sworn not to. And it is not his job to do what a free press in a free country should be doing. The disgrace rests solely on the shoulders of journalists and I hope I live long enough to see them get their just due.


7 posted on 11/01/2012 8:27:20 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PAR
I understand that Romney is pursing what he believes is the best strategy to win

I think you answered your own question

8 posted on 11/01/2012 8:28:31 PM PDT by paul51 (11 September 2001 - Never forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PAR

He can’t address it now. The media is lined up hoping he’ll address it. That’s probably what Obama is praying for because he has to address it himself. Romney can’t take a chance right now. We’ll get him. The people who will vote for him wouldn’t hold him responsible even if Mitt said anything. Patience.


9 posted on 11/01/2012 8:29:07 PM PDT by FryingPan101 (2016 looms)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PAR

He can’t address it now. The media is lined up hoping he’ll address it. That’s probably what Obama is praying for because he has to address it himself. Romney can’t take a chance right now. We’ll get him. The people who will vote for him wouldn’t hold him responsible even if Mitt said anything. Patience.


10 posted on 11/01/2012 8:29:10 PM PDT by FryingPan101 (2016 looms)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PAR

this issue is not one that is easily communicated in a soap box speech to supporters.

IMO it’s best that this issue is talked about via surrogates on sit down news progs and Sunday shows for now. We just can’t risk one stupid voter or the media spinning his words against him. We don’t have the media on our side, except Fox.

but first thing Wed morning, I expect Romney to begin talking about this, explaining the situation to those who aren’t up to speed and get his ducks in a row to do something about The Traitor once he takes office. but he should convene an investigation starting Wednesday. No doubt.


12 posted on 11/01/2012 8:31:29 PM PDT by uncitizen (Arrest The Traitor Today!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PAR

Imagine a thumb pointed down.

Perhaps you could bring this up again.... next fing Wednesday.


13 posted on 11/01/2012 8:31:42 PM PDT by Gator113 (I would have voted for NEWT, now it's Romney & Ryan.~Just livin' life, my way~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PAR

Crowley shut him down when he was going for the Marxist’s throat, and he was smart enough to spot the trap Sheiffer laid out in the third debate.

What can he say now? Watch Fox News? It’s the only news outlet (cable channel) reporting on Benghazi. The alphabets are silent and cnn is reporting B.S.

Pray and hope for something to break BIG tomorrow.


17 posted on 11/01/2012 8:36:37 PM PDT by onyx (FREE REPUBLIC IS HERE TO STAY! DONATE MONTHLY! IF YOU WANT ON SARAH PALIN''S PING LIST, LET ME KNOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PAR
Hey Mitt--- just say we will make sure that our military stays strong and that we will have the their backs when the going gets rough. We will not stand down on our band of brothers when in peril. He doesn't even need to mention Benghazi, get into the weeds but that a statement like that will be understood to mean just that.
18 posted on 11/01/2012 8:37:27 PM PDT by tflabo (Truth or Tyranny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PAR

Romney is handling this exactly right. Note that he is not privy to classified intelligence reports. Anything he says would be conjecture and can easily be refuted and ridiculed by the Obama campaign.

Elected officials such as McCain, Ayotte, and others are already raising cain over this issue.

Lastly, most voters have no clue about details of Benghazigate.


20 posted on 11/01/2012 8:39:15 PM PDT by entropy12 (Romney/Ryan 2012... Send Obama back to Chicago/Hawaii/Kenya/Indonesia wherever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PAR

I don’t think making speeches about the issue will be helpful because the MSM will make Obama out to be the victim. I do believe that raising the issue indirectly through advertising, particularly SuperPAC advertising not tied to the Romney campaign, could be effective. Just have the father outlining events then asking “please join me in asking President Obama to come clean about what happened to my son”.


24 posted on 11/01/2012 8:41:57 PM PDT by Numbers Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PAR

You do not realize that Romney has no access to CLASSIFIED TOP SECRET documents since he is not an elected official or government employee. Such documents are available only on must need basis.

I once had the Q clearance (top secret clearance), so I understand why Romney does not want to make conjecture statements not based on official documents. He can then be easily refuted and ridiculed by the Obama campaign.

Let elected officials such senators McCain, Ayotte & others handle this, which they are doing quite nicely.


27 posted on 11/01/2012 8:46:46 PM PDT by entropy12 (Romney/Ryan 2012... Send Obama back to Chicago/Hawaii/Kenya/Indonesia wherever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PAR

[My 2 cents, modified from another thread.]:

“This won’t get any play unless you make it an issue,” Romney.

On November Seven,
With your Clear Eye so bright,
Will you pause to ponder,
Could Benghazi have won the night?

Was there enough intelligence
To tell friend from foe?
Would Women be offended
If I did not go slow?

Oh me, - - - oh my,
Whatever should I have done?
To challenge ‘Benghazi’ Obama,
Or play it safe and fun?

What could I really do?
The polls were very close,
And now I can only ask:
“What would Patton do?”


28 posted on 11/01/2012 8:48:06 PM PDT by Graewoulf ((Traitor John Roberts' Obama"care" violates Sherman Anti-Trust Law, AND the U.S. Constitution.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PAR

Romney is damned if he does, damned if he doesn’t...The democrats will accuse him of politicizing the deaths if he starts talking about it, and you know the media will gladly help the democrats get that line of attack out there...It is frustrating to see him remain quiet about it, but after seeing dems on fox attacking Romney for even mentioning it, I can see why he has chosen not to address the issue at this point...


30 posted on 11/01/2012 8:49:21 PM PDT by psjones (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PAR
(A) Romney speaks out strongly on the issue and LOSES the election because he gets off message on the economy and the media accuses him of politicizing dead Americans. The truth of what happened is never uncovered.

(B) Romney stays silent on the issue for now and WINS the election. The GOP in Congress then turn the heat up on Obama like never before for the last few weeks he's in office, and Romney promises to turn over every stone to get to the truth once he's sworn in in less than 90 days.

Pick one.
33 posted on 11/01/2012 8:59:02 PM PDT by GLDNGUN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PAR; All
As I stated on another post;

THIS IS NOT ABOUT MITT!

Don't be stupid, don't make it about Mitt.

Let Mitt be Mitt, he does that job better than anyone else!

Those who care about this issue already know about this issue. If Romney speaks up about it it will take the heat OFF of Obama.

When your enemy is walking off a cliff, GET OUT OF THE WAY!

38 posted on 11/01/2012 9:08:25 PM PDT by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson