Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Are We In the Final Days of Marijuana Prohibition?
Reason ^ | 10/18/2012 | Zach Weissmueller & Paul Feine

Posted on 10/22/2012 9:09:50 AM PDT by Jayster

"There' a rising tide of acceptance of the fact that people are going to smoke marijuana, and it's like the prohibition against alcohol in the 1930s. There's a recognition that perhaps the laws are causing more harm than the drugs themselves," says Rick Steves, author and travel host.

Steves and others attended "The Final Days of Prohibition" conference in downtown Los Angeles in early October. The conference was put on by the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws (NORML), and Reason TV was on the scene to ask about the future of marijuana laws in the U.S., particularly in the upcoming election where the states of Oregon, Washington, and Colorado all have marijuana legalization initiatives on the ballot.

About 3 minutes.

Produced by Paul Feine and Zach Weissmueller. Edited by Weissmueller.

Scroll below for downloadable versions and subscribe to Reason TV's YouTube channel to receive automatic notification when new material goes live.

(Excerpt) Read more at reason.com ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: cannabis; drugs; drugwar; marijuana; warondrugs; wod; wodlist; wosd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-130 next last
To: dalereed
>"Better yet the automatic execution of any one that uses it!"

Washington, Jefferson, Lincoln.....

41 posted on 10/22/2012 10:14:29 AM PDT by rawcatslyentist ("Behold, I am against you, O arrogant one," Jeremiah 50:31)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: marron
Just wait until Madison Avenue starts actively promoting it.

I can just imagine ads for Magic Brownie Mix......

42 posted on 10/22/2012 10:15:31 AM PDT by stboz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ridesthemiles
Your scenario involves questions of liability in vehicular accidents where the vehicle operator - presumably your employee - was intoxicated at the time of the accident, and I assume therefore bears the responsibility for the accident.

Operating a vehicle in an intoxicated state seems to be the issue here. Does it make a material difference if the vehicle's operator became intoxicated from alcohol or marijuana?

43 posted on 10/22/2012 10:17:03 AM PDT by Hemingway's Ghost (Spirit of '75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: ridesthemiles

Alcohol is legal.

You can fire someone for abusing alcohol.

Your point is invalid.


44 posted on 10/22/2012 10:17:55 AM PDT by Jayster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: ridesthemiles
I don’t see a single insurance carrier in the world carrying any insurance coverage for any business if the driver’s cannot be fired, or suspended for marijuana usage.

The driving-impairing drug alcohol is legal, yet businesses can get insurance coverage.

45 posted on 10/22/2012 10:18:38 AM PDT by JustSayNoToNannies (A free society's default policy: it's none of government's business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: dalereed
On the other hand, Obama is headed for a cliff, and even long time trolls who have been just smart enough to keep their heads down for a long time, mayhap they are starting to come unwired?

Is this "Kill 'em all" trolling a feeble attempt to put a turd in the punch bowl?

46 posted on 10/22/2012 10:18:49 AM PDT by jonascord (Democrats are the people on the Left Side of the IQ Bell Curve.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: blueunicorn6
What this country needs are more people too cowardly to face reality.

They'll be braver if we keep marijuana illegal? Would they become braver still if we re-banned the drug alcohol?

47 posted on 10/22/2012 10:21:11 AM PDT by JustSayNoToNannies (A free society's default policy: it's none of government's business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: ridesthemiles

Just as we do with inebriates, we can have severe penalties in place for operating under the influence of marijuana. Legalizing this mild drug should reduce somewhat the recent rise of totalitarianism in this country.


48 posted on 10/22/2012 10:23:24 AM PDT by ladyrustic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

“Yes, a murderous, totalitarian government is really what we need.”

We’ve had that for years.


49 posted on 10/22/2012 10:25:17 AM PDT by dljordan (Voltaire: "To find out who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Jayster

Meanwhile, tobacco is under attack.


50 posted on 10/22/2012 10:27:16 AM PDT by HapaxLegamenon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: savagesusie
I know brilliant older men who drink beer every day and work hard, whose brain remains sharp. Not so with marijuana—they become really goofy and lazy.

Firstly, because marijuana is illegal its users don't advertise their use, so the only ones whose use becomes known to you are the goofy and lazy ones.

Secondly, it's at least as likely that any cause and effect relationship runs the opposite way: that people who are already goofy and lazy are likelier than average to turn to marijuana use.

51 posted on 10/22/2012 10:33:02 AM PDT by JustSayNoToNannies (A free society's default policy: it's none of government's business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: corkoman

Authoritarians come in all flavors. And yes, it baffles me to that many here on FR claim to be for freedom and the pursuit of happiness, but then want to control people who are stupid enough to drug themselves.


52 posted on 10/22/2012 10:34:07 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Never believe anything in politics until it has been officially denied.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: dljordan

But he is wanting to take it up to Soviet Stalin levels.


53 posted on 10/22/2012 10:35:31 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Never believe anything in politics until it has been officially denied.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
Legalization brings regulation,

Which is worse than prohibition how?

taxation

If this is an argument for keeping illegal things illegal, it's equally an argument for making legal taxable things illegal.

and corruption.

Whereas no corruption results from the prohibition of marijuana?

54 posted on 10/22/2012 10:39:13 AM PDT by JustSayNoToNannies (A free society's default policy: it's none of government's business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: savagesusie
Socialist and nihilistic cultures have to promote a society with a comatose mind, so they are easily manipulated and too lazy to protest. If it is legal, they can get more young people addicted-—the way they did with alcohol.

So should alcohol be banned?

55 posted on 10/22/2012 10:42:07 AM PDT by JustSayNoToNannies (A free society's default policy: it's none of government's business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JustSayNoToNannies

I agree with whatever.

(Its not important enough for me to waste my time arguing about)

Now go bother someone else.


56 posted on 10/22/2012 10:45:10 AM PDT by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
(Its not important enough for me to waste my time arguing about)

But it was important enough for you to waste your time posting ignorant easily-rebutted twaddle?

Now go bother someone else.

Rebutting your ignorant twaddle is "bothering" you? Have a hankie. And next time, stay out of the kitchen if you can't take the heat.

57 posted on 10/22/2012 10:47:54 AM PDT by JustSayNoToNannies (A free society's default policy: it's none of government's business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Jayster

No. People will get tired of the potheads disturbing their lives and robbing them, just like last time.


58 posted on 10/22/2012 10:49:27 AM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JustSayNoToNannies

((shrug))


59 posted on 10/22/2012 10:50:13 AM PDT by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: JustSayNoToNannies
Not following this thread but just scrolling past your comments:Firstly, because marijuana is illegal its users don't advertise their use...had me ROTFLMAO!

Having reached adulthood in the mid-sixties when penalties were greater, people volunteered their use of marihootchie, as if the smell that permeated their clothes, hair, and lungs wasn't a dead give away. And the more powerful versions of the last few decades are even more aromatic.

Co-workers who stepped out for a J always thought they were pulling a fast one on the rest of us in much the same way the three vodka martini lunch crowd thought their breathe was sweet. And coincidentally work performance for both classes was sub-par and mistake ridden, standing in stark contrast to their delusional self image.

Thanks for Mr Natural recollections and the chuckles.

Keep on truckin' dude...hahahaha

60 posted on 10/22/2012 10:52:24 AM PDT by Covenantor ("Men are ruled...by liars who refuse them news, and by fools who cannot govern." Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-130 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson