Skip to comments.
Proposition 37: Mandatory labeling of genetically engineered food
KABC TV Los Angelos ^
| 10/05/2012
| Robert Holguin
Posted on 10/21/2012 8:06:01 PM PDT by RushingWater
GLENDALE, Calif. (KABC) -- Proposition 37 is a measure to require mandatory labeling of genetically engineered food. There are two sides to this contentious issue.
(Excerpt) Read more at abclocal.go.com ...
TOPICS: Extended News; Government; Miscellaneous; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: 37; alinksytactics; alterhumangenome; antibusiness; anticapitalism; antigmotradewar; arpadpusztai; barbaraboxer; californiademocrats; californiafruitcakes; cancer; carryokie; communists; corporatistfascism; deathoffreewill; dehumanization; democratpropositions; demonizegmo; demonizemonsanto; elections; endocrinedisrupted; environmentalwackos; facists; flatearthers; foodnazis; foodslavery; fr4government; fr4greens; fr4occupy; fr4ows; freepers4regulation; friendsofearth; genocide; glyphosate; glyphosatemalformed; gmo; gmonazis; gmoobesitycrisis; gmotoxinsnewborns; government; governmentcontrol; greenfreepers; greenpeace; greens; idiocy; insanity; leftists; lobbyistinfda; lossofrights; luddites; lunacy; marxists; maxinewaters; monsanto; monsantodeclareswar; monsantovpfoodczar; moveon; neurotoxicity; occupy; occupyfood; occupyfr; occupygmo; paidposters; progessives; prop37; propaganda; proposition37; regulateplease; regulateusplease; roselawmonsanto; roundup; sierraclub; trolls; universitymarxists; usdiplomats4monsanto; usgovownebymonsanto; vilsackmonsanto; wallaroundcalifornia; wehategmo; welovegmo; weloveregulation; whoownsyourbody; wwf
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340, 341-360, 361-380, 381-386 last
To: editor-surveyor
The genetic print is easy enough to get. Just grind up the material, chip it and compare it to known genetic sequences.
To: hedgetrimmer
That is “reverse engineering,” its illegal.
382
posted on
11/08/2012 6:31:20 AM PST
by
editor-surveyor
(Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
To: editor-surveyor
Say you have a farmer who farms next to a GMO field. He wants to make sure his crop is clean so he hires a certification lab to test it.
They find patented material in his crop.
Is that illegal? For whom?
To: hedgetrimmer
If they do it without a license from monsanto, then yes it is unlawful reverse engineering.
384
posted on
11/08/2012 9:34:16 AM PST
by
editor-surveyor
(Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
To: editor-surveyor
So you’re saying that you need a license from Monsanto to test an organic farmer’s open pollinated seeds for GMO contamination?
To: hedgetrimmer
I’m quite sure that such an investigation would violate current patent law.
This stuff isn’t always logical.
386
posted on
11/08/2012 5:05:28 PM PST
by
editor-surveyor
(Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340, 341-360, 361-380, 381-386 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson