Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mitt Romney pushes into battle ground states of PA and NH weeks before presidential election
NY Daily News ^ | Saturday, October 20, 2012, 3:28 PM | Jonathan Lemire

Posted on 10/20/2012 1:34:49 PM PDT by Red Steel

Anxious to find the right combination of states to win the Electoral College, Mitt Romney’s campaign pushed Saturday into battlegrounds it had largely avoided.

The Republicans forged into the swing states of Pennsylvania and New Hampshire, which the GOP had previously appeared resigned to ceding to President Obama.

Paul Ryan, Romney’s running mate, ripped Obama’s energy policy to a crowd at the Pittsburgh International Airport.

"Gas prices are more than double what they were four years ago - who knows what they're going to be if he got four more years," Ryan said. "Not only are these policies wrong, they...cost us jobs.”

The GOP also bought ad time on Boston television stations, which broadcast into the state directly north.

Though New Hampshire only awards four electoral votes, its importance is magnified if Romney can’t win Ohio. A loss in the Buckeye State, where Obama holds a slight lead over Romney, would mean the Republican would need to almost sweep the remaining swing states.

Obama is making his own push into those battlegrounds, announcing that he will launch a two-day, “around the clock campaign blitz” across six states starting Tuesday.

Air Force One will cover thousands of miles as the President holds events in Iowa, Colorado, Nevada, Florida, Virginia and Ohio - and makes a stop in Chicago to cast his own ballot early.

Both Obama and Romney remained holed up Saturday preparing for their last debate, to be held Monday on foreign policy.

They will square off in Florida, where Vice President Biden rallied supporters Saturday.

“With you, we can take Florida,” Biden said in St. Augustine. “If we take Florida, this election is over."

Biden also again touted his campaign’s new rallying cry - that Romney changes positions so much that he must suffer from chronic “Romnesia.”


TOPICS: Extended News; Politics/Elections; US: New Hampshire; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: newhampshire; pennsylvania; romney; uspennsylvania
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 last
To: LS

I remember 2008 when lots of Freepers were saying McCain was going to win. It was not backed by any polls but everyone kept touting the Bradley Effect. How ridiculous does that look now? I think anyone who disagreed was probably attacked.

Of course Romney’s going to do better than McCain but that’s not automatically the same as winning.


61 posted on 10/20/2012 8:01:16 PM PDT by lasereye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: lasereye

That’s not the argument. The data says that Ibama’s early vote #s show such a falloff that he can’t win. Now, if you want to keep going on this, fin but I am not going to talk about 2008. Show me in the 2012 data where Obama wins. Don’t give me polls. Give me evidence from the actual data. But please don’t keep whining about 08.


62 posted on 10/20/2012 8:07:22 PM PDT by LS ("Castles Made of Sand, Fall in the Sea . . . Eventually (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers
Here is a guy in IA seeing the same thing we are seeing in OH.

https://twitter.com/adrian_gray/status/259839492456849408

63 posted on 10/20/2012 8:14:34 PM PDT by LS ("Castles Made of Sand, Fall in the Sea . . . Eventually (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: LS

I’m not aware it’s possible to project the outcome with any confidence based on early voting patterns. I’m not disputing what you say but I’m curious as to where it comes from. Is there a statistical correlation model which produces such a prediction? Is it a computer model? Is it a methodology you developed? Just asking.


64 posted on 10/20/2012 8:19:30 PM PDT by lasereye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: LS

That guy just says IA will be close based on early voting, but the polls are showing that too. So early voting isn’t telling us something different than polls, if he knows what he’s talking about.


65 posted on 10/20/2012 8:24:18 PM PDT by lasereye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: lasereye

Well other than the WSJ/NBC poll, IA is close.


66 posted on 10/20/2012 8:25:07 PM PDT by lasereye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: lasereye
Early voting is new, but absentee voting is not. Some states, such as OH are "red turnout" days on Election Day. In OH, if the Ds don't have too big a lead by Election Day, Rs win. That simple.

Other states, such as NC, also have heavy early voting, but in 08 Ds turned out higher on Election Day, so it's important the Rs LEAD in absentee/early voting (which they have in NC).

IA and NV are just the opposite: there the Ds build up big early voting leads.

We've explained the science here dozens of times. Have you been watching the threads? Let tell you what sold me on this reality. In 2004, late at night they were still counting ballots in IA. Michael Barone was on FOX looking at just one or two counties. He said, with the counties still yet to report, Bush has won. The counties were composed in such a way that if they voted at traditional percentage splits, Bush would win.

That's all we do here. We look at which counties turned out in what percentages, and just draw trend lines. If you have a red county turning out 20% higher than in 08 when it lost by 10% it doesn't take a genius to see that the Rs will win that county.

Every state has key counties that tell you all you need to know. If the early vote is held own in Clark Co. NV. , we win. If the absentee/early vote is heavy in Warren Co. or Hamilton Co. it's pretty likely we win.

67 posted on 10/21/2012 4:46:53 AM PDT by LS ("Castles Made of Sand, Fall in the Sea . . . Eventually (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: lasereye
Eeyore is one thing. Eeyore in the teeth of clear evidence to the contrary, and statements that "D+9 are just as likely as R+1" -- after the 2010 Teanami, and in the evidence of Obaama collapse despite obvious efforts at cheating by the MSM -- is not credible, and so leads to the other explanation, that of "Troll."

Cheers!

68 posted on 10/21/2012 4:53:04 AM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: lasereye

See, you’re still not getting it. The guy didn’t say IA “will be close”, what he said was that the early voting percentages (D/Rsplits + turnout) look like 04, not 08. Well, in 04 it was lose but Bush won. In 08 IA was gone before early voting was over because of the D lead in early voting, but that isn’t happening in 2012. Early outing is not about numbers it’s about percentages-— who has the bullets left in their gun? I’m not saying R will win IA, but rather that it looks like 04, not 08, which means Rs are MORE LIKELY to win.


69 posted on 10/21/2012 4:55:33 AM PDT by LS ("Castles Made of Sand, Fall in the Sea . . . Eventually (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: RS_Rider
I had business in Pittsburgh on Thursday, and drove there along Rt 22 heading west. Not one Bozo sign anywhere. A good number of Romney signs, and 4-5 anti-Bozo ads that were up on electronic billboards. I was really quite surprised.

One big static billboard had a picture of a chicken with the caption "A taxpayer voting for Obama is like a chicken voting for Col. Sanders".

Bottom line, the effort is there in W. PA.

70 posted on 10/21/2012 5:29:16 AM PDT by THX 1138 ("Harry, I have a gift.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: LS
I haven't said Romney is going to lose OH but the comments here suggest that he's going into PA because he has OH wrapped up and wants more of a mandate. Maybe they've drawn the same conclusion you have but Rasmussen has OH a toss up. I would be very surprised if they think OH is in the bag.
71 posted on 10/21/2012 2:56:01 PM PDT by lasereye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson