Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Responsibility2nd

The Boy Scouts don’t allow heterosexuals to be alone with Scouts. They don’t risk any potential liability.


6 posted on 10/18/2012 11:00:41 AM PDT by popdonnelly (The first priority is get Obama out of the White House.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: popdonnelly

Yep, it is called 2 deep leadership. Background checks have also been put into place. In my son’s troop as with all troops, there must be two men present at all times with Scouts (unless it is the dad’s son). The Boy Scouts have also instituted Youth Protection. It helps Assistant Scoutmasters recognize signs of abuse. However, as with most situations, it is impossible to insure that no problems will occur in a given situation. If a pervert is determined to become an adult leader in Boy Scouts, he will find a way. Sort of like seat belts in a car. Car manufacturers can install seat belts. But if a person is determined to drive without one, he will.


9 posted on 10/18/2012 11:33:14 AM PDT by drinktheobamakoolaid (How do you replace an empty suit? Vote on November 6, 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: popdonnelly; Scoutmaster; ScubieNuc; TheGunny; Delhi Rebels; HopeSprings

Boy Scouts ping.

pop makes this statement. “The Boy Scouts don’t allow heterosexuals to be alone with Scouts. They don’t risk any potential liability.”

Is that right.

Also in this thread... “The Boy Scouts get what they deserve.”

I’m guessing a certain FReeper SUPPORTS homo scout leaders.


12 posted on 10/18/2012 12:05:26 PM PDT by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson