Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rurgan

I wonder if last week was adjusted up for California not fully reporting there numbers, or were those numbers rolled into this week?


18 posted on 10/18/2012 5:50:10 AM PDT by DAC21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: DAC21

Article says previous week was revised up 4,000 then this on top of that.


21 posted on 10/18/2012 5:51:18 AM PDT by John W (Viva Cristo Rey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: DAC21
NO.

These numbers are only for this week. last week they left out california ( and didn't say that in the headlines). They faked everything for that week of the economic debates so Romney wouldn't use high unemployment or the no jobs argument against Obama( it was an attempt to silence Romney in the debates now that the debate is foreign policy the real numbers come out).
They faked the 7.8% unemployment rate just so Romney couldn’t hit Obama with over 8% unemployment in the debate. Now these numbers show they faked it.

26 posted on 10/18/2012 5:56:35 AM PDT by rurgan (Sunset all laws at 4 years.China is destroying U.S. ability to manufacture,makes everything)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: DAC21

I heard you the first time...........;^)


54 posted on 10/18/2012 6:23:55 AM PDT by Red Badger (Is it just me, or is Hillary! starting to look like Benjamin Franklin?.................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: DAC21

They said last week that it would be after the election before California’s numbers would be factored in.

LLS


69 posted on 10/18/2012 7:00:46 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer (OUR GOVERNMENT AND PRESS ARE NO LONGER TRUSTWORTHY OR DESERVING OF RESPECT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson