Skip to comments.
A Turn of the Page for Newsweek
The Daily Beast ^
| October 18, 2012
| Tina Brown, Baba Shetty
Posted on 10/18/2012 5:21:55 AM PDT by PittsburghAfterDark
We are announcing this morning an important development at Newsweek and The Daily Beast. Newsweek will transition to an all-digital format in early 2013. As part of this transition, the last print edition in the United States will be our Dec. 31 issue.
Meanwhile, Newsweek will expand its rapidly growing tablet and online presence, as well as its successful global partnerships and events business.
Newsweek Global, as the all-digital publication will be named, will be a single, worldwide edition targeted for a highly mobile, opinion-leading audience who want to learn about world events in a sophisticated context. Newsweek Global will be supported by paid subscription and will be available through e-readers for both tablet and the Web, with select content available on The Daily Beast.
(Excerpt) Read more at thedailybeast.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: doa; enemedia; internet; liberalmedia; lol; msm; newsweak; newsweek; trends
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 next last
To: crosshairs
Good one, Crosshairs! I for one won’t miss it and I look forward to Time joining it on the ash-heap of History!
21
posted on
10/18/2012 5:37:08 AM PDT
by
ConorMacNessa
(HM/2 USN, 3/5 Marines RVN 1969 - St. Michael the Archangel defend us in Battle!)
To: PittsburghAfterDark
My cockatoo grieves for the change to its birdcage.
22
posted on
10/18/2012 5:37:32 AM PDT
by
Stosh
To: jilliane
"News-Week" was launched in 1933 by Thomas J.C. Martyn, a former foreign-news editor for Time. He obtained financial backing from a group of U.S. stockholders "which included Ward Cheney, of the Cheney silk family, John Hay Whitney, and Paul Mellon, son of Andrew W. Mellon". Paul Mellon's ownership in Newsweek apparently represented "the first attempt of the Mellon family to function journalistically on a national scale." The group of original owners invested around $2.5 million. Other large stockholders prior to 1946 were public utilities investment banker Stanley Childs, and Wall Street corporate lawyer Wilton Lloyd-Smith. The first issue of the magazine was dated 17 February 1933. Seven photographs from the week's news were printed on the first issue's cover.
23
posted on
10/18/2012 5:37:40 AM PDT
by
John W
(Viva Cristo Rey!)
To: Battle Axe
Nope because there will be many more...
Newsweak is just the first.
To: 04-Bravo; aimhigh; andyandval; Arizona Carolyn; Bahbah; bert; bilhosty; Caipirabob; carmenbmw; ...
25
posted on
10/18/2012 5:39:26 AM PDT
by
abb
("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS." Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
To: PittsburghAfterDark
26
posted on
10/18/2012 5:51:19 AM PDT
by
Eric in the Ozarks
(In the game of life, there are no betting limits)
To: PittsburghAfterDark
What? WHAT? You mean I can’t read Newsweak in my doctor’s office anymore? (I’m convinced all dr’s offices have been getting it for free which makes the magazine’s sales appear higher).
27
posted on
10/18/2012 5:58:07 AM PDT
by
kitkat
To: Cato in PA
Patience, young Skywalker. Patience ...
28
posted on
10/18/2012 6:02:38 AM PDT
by
IronJack
(=)
To: PittsburghAfterDark
Newsweek was once a great publication. Its writers included Henry Hazlitt, author of Economics in One Lesson (New York: Harper, 1946), a classic that is still in print, and Ralph de Toledano, whose Seeds of Treason (1950), the story of the Alger Hiss spy case, was "a Newsweek book" published for the magazine by Funk & Wagnalls.
29
posted on
10/18/2012 6:06:29 AM PDT
by
Fiji Hill
(Deo Vindice!)
To: abb
For some mysterious reason, it's becoming difficult for Newsers like him to find a paying job!
30
posted on
10/18/2012 6:10:40 AM PDT
by
Zakeet
(Calling the Obozo/Bernack economy sluggish is an insult to slugs)
To: kitkat
(Im convinced all drs offices have been getting it for free which makes the magazines sales appear higher.) I think you are correct. My dentist has pictures of him and his wife with President and Laura Bush in the White House. He has the Newsweak publications in his office with his business address. Same for my former doctor. He hates 0 bummer care and may retire.
31
posted on
10/18/2012 6:11:10 AM PDT
by
Arrowhead1952
("It's better to vote for a Republican you don't know than wind up with a dim you don't like".)
To: PittsburghAfterDark
32
posted on
10/18/2012 6:12:47 AM PDT
by
dead
(It ain't over until the phone lady sings.)
To: PittsburghAfterDark
Newsweak has been limping away for years. What are we going to read while waiting in the doctors office? Oh NOOOOOO!
33
posted on
10/18/2012 6:17:42 AM PDT
by
Ditter
To: Berlin_Freeper
Newsweek Global is the chicken with its head cut off running around the barnyard crashing into stuff.
34
posted on
10/18/2012 6:22:38 AM PDT
by
cgbg
(No bailouts for New York and California. Let them eat debt.)
To: circlecity
RIP Newsweak - thank goodness and good riddance. Remember their radio adswhich reflected their guerrilla war against the gigantic TIME?
"The one newsweekly that separates fact from opinion!"
They punted that strategy around 1980, mebbe.
To: PittsburghAfterDark
This is nothing more than a death gurgle. Newsweak will die and be no more.......
To: PittsburghAfterDark
37
posted on
10/18/2012 6:45:32 AM PDT
by
Ancesthntr
(Why do blacks think that a half-white multi-millionairre really cares about them?)
To: Izzy Dunne
38
posted on
10/18/2012 6:53:08 AM PDT
by
preacher
(Communism has only killed 100 million people: Let's give it another chance!)
To: PittsburghAfterDark
From the comments section:
“Meh... Pay for information? Not likely. Any information out there is pretty much free, so all I’d be paying you for is highlighting important information, and your opinion.
1. Emphasis: I can highlight information for myself. That’s the way I see the net eventually becoming. Providers provide information and context, users provide formatting and emphasis. You determine content, I decide how I view it.
2. Opinion: I don’t really care for it. The only person who represents my opinion is me. I’m tired of news organizations brainwashing people into believing that the news organization fully represents their opinion. That’s the problem with a two-party political system and news in general, no one is fully represented. Americans can solve most of these issues on our own, but we’re forced into these cookie-cutter platforms, a choice between standing still, and progressing to a slippery slope.
So in short, it appears I’m saying, I don’t need you. And I think you’ll find that’s how most people feel.”
To: PittsburghAfterDark
40
posted on
10/18/2012 7:14:12 AM PDT
by
Jim Noble
(Diseases desperate grown are by desperate appliance relieved or not at all.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson