Posted on 10/18/2012 5:13:46 AM PDT by lowbridge
I'm a Catholic convert. I'm also divorced (not my choice!) The chances are that I can never remarry unless, God forbid, my ex-husband were to die pretty soon. So be it; I accept and understand that and thank God for His will, whatever it is and no matter how hard, sad, and lonely it has been. But Protestants do not believe as you and I do, and I don't expect them to make the choices we do. Many Protestants believe that if a spouse commits adultery, or if an unbelieving spouse departs, they are free to remarry. I disagree, but I do not judge them harshly because they are acting according to their light.
LOL Many many years ago I separated from my first husband and filed for divorce. Between the separation and divorce he suggested an engagement between him and this other woman. When I went over there to get my things there were greeting cards everywhere to him from her expressing some little endearment. Sixty days after our divorce they married and I guess still are as I have never looked back. Hope they are still married and best of luck.
Thanks.
“I think its fine for him to give more accurate facts, if the other writers claims were incorrect.”
Indeed, he did.
“I also think its disingenuous for him to say he never considered anyone would find his actions inappropriate.”
So, if I understand you correctly, he did well by responding, whereas his statement about becoming engaged before formally divorced is your concern and prompted the “wounded naif” accusation.
Upon review, in my view, I disagree with your accusation that “the wounded naif act was a little weak.”
Appreciate the exchange.
Agreeing to disagree is fine with me, too. It's what one expects.
All human beings share some traits. They like to speculate and gossip.
They see a married man traveling and spending a lot of time with a woman not his wife and they draw conclusions and spread them around. That's unfortunate, but it's human nature.
Do you really think leftists and radical Islamicists were hanging out in Spartanburg, SC spreading lies about Dinesh?
Maybe it was just ordinary people drawing ordinary conclusions -- true or false -- based on what they saw.
“What we cannot do is whitewash the problems as if they don’t exist.”
Thanks for setting the record straight regarding the source of the article. I admit I assumed it was the left looking for a way to indirectly diminish the credibility of the movie.
Regarding the relationship with the young woman etc., I don’t think that failing to do what’s right in life is a small matter, but I’m personally way too far from being in a position to judge him. The first thing that comes to my mind in any separation or divorce situation, in which abuse isn’t an issue, is that it is very sad. I wish everyone could make it work once they enter their vows. Divorce is generally one of life’s biggest losses and hurts. If he and his wife are only separated, I hope that somehow they can still make it work.
Where does he say he’s engaged? In one thread (or report on a thread), he said specifically that he was not having an affair, and he was not engaged to this lady! This is in a recent article from Oct. 17th! He said that some writer gave that impression, and it was false! He said that the writer said that he introduced her as his fiance, and she wasn’t? I’m honestly confused! Unless he suddenly turned around and admitted it today?
I trust World Magazine's staff. If they screwed up, they'll investigate and apologize, with the reporter being disciplined.
Precisely because of that, I think it's clear **SOMETHING** happened, and whatever happened was very unwise for someone who has put himself into the limelight like Dinesh D’Souza.
Right now my guess is we're dealing with a window into a very troubled marriage. Maybe Dinesh D’Souza will wake up and fix the mess before it's too late. If he doesn't, he's going to be permanently damaged in conservative Christian circles, and seriously damaged in the broader conservative movement.
Unfortunately for him, his private problems have now gone very public and that makes them much harder to solve.
The least that can be said is it looks like he said and did some very unwise things.
People at that level of politics can be expected to know better. When they don't, it's a likely indicator of much more serious issues.
We don't need Bill Clinton issues in the GOP.
Fantastic thanks.
This article by Christianity Today largely confirms the original World Magazine report but also includes some troubling comments about the future direction of the college.
This is not good. It looks as if D’Souza will not be the only casualty of this situation — the college itself may end up losing its Christian activist mission.
We'll all know more soon.
____
Dinesh D’Souza Resigns as President of The King's College
School may now shift from his emphasis on conservative politics.
By Melissa Steffan [posted 10/18/2012 11:58AM]
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.