Benghazi Attack Was Botched Kidnapping To Trade Blind Sheik.

Western Journalism.com ^ | October 17, 2012 | Kris Zane

[Simcha7]

Benghazi Attack Was Botched Kidnapping To Trade Blind Sheik.

America watched in disbelief as Barack Obama tried to tell the American people that the attack on the Libyan consulate on September 11 was the result of an amateurish, anti-Muslim video that had been on YouTube for three months with barely three hundred views.

Then suddenly the administration announced that it was, yes, a terrorist attack, but that it was the intelligence community that had fed him bad information, even though we knew our intelligence community had known it was an al-Qaeda-linked attack within twenty four hours.

Why the equivocation? Why the lies?

None of it made sense.

Until now.

Now Obama’s throwing long-time ally Egypt’s president Hosni Mubarak under the bus for the Muslim Brotherhood makes sense. All the White House contacts with Muslim Brotherhood front groups like CAIR and ISNA. All the changes that CAIR and ISNA made to the training manuals that our intelligence community uses.

Kevin Dujan, a political analyst and radio and TV host wrote an article and appeared on radio on October 8 putting forth a theory that the attack of the Libyan consulate was tied neither to a video or terrorism, but a botched kidnapping of Ambassador Stevens.

That Barack Obama had arranged with the Muslim Brotherhood to kidnap the Ambassador, and through Obama’s supposed affinity with the Muslim world, Obama would save the day and get the ambassador released.

But the Muslim Brotherhood wanted something in return.

Their beloved Blind Sheik.

Unbelievable?

Western Journalism broke the news on Monday that a source connected to the White House has stated that the murder of Stevens and the other Americans was a botched kidnapping linked to one Barack Hussein Obama.

WATCH THE YOUTUBE VIDEO:

http://www.westernjournalism.com/benghazi-attack-was-botched-kidnapping-to-trade-blind-sheik/

Simcha7.

[GOPJ]

I did note that Obama seemed to have the really odd explanation regarding the almost unknown video ready to go.

My guess is whatever was planned was screwed up by the two ex-military men coming to help and turning it into a firefight.

You're right. When I watched it on YouTube the the counter was still very low... the Drudge crowd hadn't quite arrived yet. I doubt many Muslims had seen it - no less had time to get worked up about it.

Too bad our MSM, suck-up press - CNN, types are so biased and one-sided ... This - along with security being pulled in August - might be an interesting story... It at least warrants a second look - or a first look.

I'm sure the New York Times is ready to flood the zone... they'll get to the bottom of this... /s

[Marine_Uncle]

Just a brief follow up. After reading the DOS minutes taken at the press interview I can now see why TigerEye and Ernest responded as they did as to the low probability of DOS/WH having some pre-arranged deal to set up a exchange between the Blind goon and the Ambassador.
The DOS report alone provides much more collective information then I had obtained watching the Issa hearing.
Thanks for the composite maps. I had been shooting blind doing google searches in map mode. Only had located the "C Building" in essence.
No follow up needed on any of your parts. S & T pretty much provided the info I was seeking.

[TigersEye]

That guy’s theories are pretty cockeyed. The links to his first two videos don’t show what he says they will show. He thinks the Mossad would have killed Stevens if anyone would have. He thinks that CNN, the day after the attack, making the mistake of saying Stevens was killed in a car is some big deal. I didn’t read any further so I don’t know how he comes up with the idea that there was no consulate but that’s a rather looney idea.

[uncitizen]

You forgot the word TRAITOR!

[Marine_Uncle]

A roger that to your latest statements. It sounded ok from the initial concept not having a more detailed account such as your reference to the DOS press minutes. I bookmarked that DOS page, after a careful read.
Perhaps in due time we shall get a better picture of just what role the Ambassador played within the operation to recover the shoulder fired rockets and other weapons the composite bad guys had accumulated.

[TigersEye]

I can now see why TigerEye and Ernest responded as they did as to the low probability of DOS/WH having some pre-arranged deal to set up a exchange between the Blind goon and the Ambassador.

I don't recall commenting on that but I do think it's stretching to find a reason for the attack. Since when do muzzie jihadis need reasons to attack Americans? Especially in Libya where a lot of people who might not have had any sympathy for radical muslims might be madder than hornets about the 0bama-NATO sacking of what was the most modernized and westernized Arab nation in the world. And then there are the radicals.

[Marine_Uncle]

In this post you and Ernest basically said you did not think the Kozy postings had any credibility. That is. a secret arrangement for the Ambassador to be captured, then having an exchange with the Blind Sheik, to free him.
I'm now of the same opinion. That is. A false scenario was put forth as to the true nature of the terrorist attack.

[TigersEye]

He probably was assisting CIA and counter-intel ops with efforts to recover weapons and build dossiers on jihadi groups. That's what ambassadors do. Embassies and consulates are where the CIA and military spooks often work out of. There is nothing new about that.

There are two absolutely gigantic scandals here that sit right at the feet of Boreock 0bungles. The security situation in Benghazi was deplorable. Criminally negligent it was so bad. So bad it easily lends itself to theories of a setup.

The second and bigger political scandal is the "video" hoax the pResident and his administration worked feverishly to establish and in some ways still is attempting to keep alive. It is an absurd and clownish excuse for muzzie violence in Egypt and an even more ridiculous excuse for the consulate attack. It's a humongous lie that 0bama has tried to promote to America and the world.

The reason for the "video" hoax demands an explanation but it may not be any more complicated than 0bama's anti-Colonialist mindset as described by Dinesh D'Souza. IOWs 0bama really believes that cornball Youtube videos are what makes muslims crazed psychotic killers. Look at his demeanor in his UN speech when he talks about the "video." He appears to be on the verge of going jihadi himself just thinking about the insults to the profit.

[TigersEye]

I was just speaking of the credibility of an all out military assault being used to kidnap someone. I think it's very credible that 0bama has been trying to find some way to give Morsi the blind shake.

I guess it is a natural conclusion that if the assault doesn't hold water as a kidnapping technique then the theory that the attack was part of a planned swap won't hold water either. But I didn't have that in mind.

[Marine_Uncle]

Your statements sit well with my own opinions. And with so many mussie now wondering around the WH, DOS and lib think tanks that get access to the WH etc., not to mention the black widow, (Jarrett) that keeps a careful eye on the usurper, and Hildabeast and side kicks, all sold on promoting current foreign policy so whacko in nature it is a wonder some in the DOD and CIA, can force themselves to even show up for work.
Of course we can go into long list of grievances we know are totally supportable by anyone keeping watch on what goes on in this administration.
And Putin watches with much patience.

[Marine_Uncle]

RE: "I was just speaking of the credibility of an all out military assault being used to kidnap someone."

That is what I was referring to. And I now hold the same opinion you dictated.

[TigersEye]

Have you seen any stories on Gaddafi's incredible water projects and how 0bama-NATO targeted it? Or the huge number of people in Libya displaced and put into starvation by the destruction of that water project and other infrastructure?

July 22nd 2011 the day NATO hit the Libyan water supply pipeline.

In terms of fighting Gaddafi and his forces how was that a strategic target? Who is helping those people who are now at the mercy of muzzy jihadis who would just as soon wipe them out? 0bama and NATO created that mess and where are the relief organizations? Where is the UN?

[TigersEye]

Yeah, our government is basically usurped at the highest levels by both Marxist and Islamo-fascist traitors. In that I see no question of its truth.

Putin and Beijing are patient and ever ready to seize on the opportunities this jug-eared community organizer is creating for them.

[TigersEye]

And I now hold the same opinion you dictated.

I know I hold strong opinions but ya doesn't have to call me a dick-tater! ROTFL

[Marine_Uncle]

Thanks. I'll check out the URL you provided. In the whole I watched the whole Libyan mess created by the current goons in the White House and DOD as things unfolded, and did read tons of stuff produced here as well as elsewhere.
I cannot say what your URL will contained was read in times past. I'll check it out. I have been exchanging pings between you and Ernest for the past hour or so and do try to keep up.
Ernest stepped out for a while. So I can concentrate on what you just sent.

[Marine_Uncle]

Whoops sorry. I did not mean for it to come out that way. :)
Now to reading your Libyan water project URL.

[TigersEye]

LOL

[Marine_Uncle]

I read the composite of articles on NATO bombing of the water pipeline in Brega. I cannot say I remember reading about that particular event. But was following all that was coming out in that region that encompasses Brega and Sirt as military actions took place.
This administration is obviously screwing the pooch on so many accounts it is beyond belief, with what they have gotten away with so far.
So many super screw ups.

[Marine_Uncle]

In all fairness. The NATO air strikes on that pipe line as well as the pipe line factory could simply have been collateral damaged, as ground was calling in coordinates to have some small groups of goons taken out.
It is a slippery slop to delve into the reasons for the damage to had taken place in the first place.

[TigersEye]

Fair enough. Perhaps are “smart” technology isn’t as advanced as we’d like to believe.