[Marine_Uncle]

In this post you and Ernest basically said you did not think the Kozy postings had any credibility. That is. a secret arrangement for the Ambassador to be captured, then having an exchange with the Blind Sheik, to free him.
I'm now of the same opinion. That is. A false scenario was put forth as to the true nature of the terrorist attack.

[TigersEye]

I was just speaking of the credibility of an all out military assault being used to kidnap someone. I think it's very credible that 0bama has been trying to find some way to give Morsi the blind shake.

I guess it is a natural conclusion that if the assault doesn't hold water as a kidnapping technique then the theory that the attack was part of a planned swap won't hold water either. But I didn't have that in mind.

[TigersEye]

Have you seen any stories on Gaddafi's incredible water projects and how 0bama-NATO targeted it? Or the huge number of people in Libya displaced and put into starvation by the destruction of that water project and other infrastructure?

July 22nd 2011 the day NATO hit the Libyan water supply pipeline.

In terms of fighting Gaddafi and his forces how was that a strategic target? Who is helping those people who are now at the mercy of muzzy jihadis who would just as soon wipe them out? 0bama and NATO created that mess and where are the relief organizations? Where is the UN?