Will there be any consequences for Secretary Clinton accepting responsibility for Benghazi attack?

American Thinker ^ | 10/16/2012 | Bruce Johnson

[Washi]

Someone with the time and the talent needs to draw or photoshop an image of Obama hiding behind Hillary and Susan Rice and distribute it far and wide.

[massgopguy]

“People who are to blame lose their jobs. people who are responsible do not.” - David Frye as Richard Nixon

[Da Coyote]

Of course not.

One could only wish that Hillary, Nancy Botoxi, degenerate Reid, et al could be in an airliner piloted by the Obamadork. (Video of the crash at 11.) Party afterwards.

Oh, forgot, in many ways, that’s the situation we’re in right now.

[Joe 6-pack]

The consequences are four dead Americans. The administration and their media shills have accepted the consequences as a "bump in the road" and moved on.

Nothing more to see here...

[Sacajaweau]

Another couple of monthys and they’ll be all gone. They’ll just lie their way through to the end.

[DuncanWaring]

The consequences will be at least as severe as they were for Janet Reno’s BBQ-ing of the Davidians.

[Travis McGee]

Where was Obama on 9-11?

[Norm Lenhart]

And then the cry will be “This is just a witch hunt to tarnish the legacy of the first Black president...Putr political retribution”

Bank on it.

[golf lover]

Democratic defa vu? You’ll recall that way back in 1993, Attorney General Janet Reno took responsibility for the federal massacre of the Branch Davidians at Waco, Texas. “I made the decision,” Reno said at her news conference after the Waco bonfire. “I’m accountable. The buck stops with me.”

[Jane Long]

Funny you should mention Nixon, who, of all people came to understand it's as much about the cover-up, as it is the crime!

[Shannon]

Only time will tell what the consequences will be to Hillary.

In that video where she accepts responsibility, did anyone else happen to catch her say, "I have now for 20 years been very much in the administration / decision making, first with my husband then after 9/11 working with President Bush....." Huh? Hillary worked with President Bush in decision making after 9/11? What's that all about?

[txrefugee]

Democrats are expert shape-shifters. Because they have no principles, they can lie about everything, and they know that they will get away with it.

Republicans, on the other hand, are required to be as blameless as Jesus, because they have moral standards to uphold.

[TomGuy]

It was GUTLESS for her to wait until she was out of the country (in Peru) to make the announcement.

Wonder what the details of the deal were that got her to fall on the sword?

[SeekAndFind]

RE: Hillary worked with President Bush in decision making after 9/11? What’s that all about?

She was for the invasion of Iraq before she was against it. Just like John Kerry, John Edwards and the rest of their ilk.

[Roccus]

Another couple of monthys and they’ll be all gone.

Clinton and Rice were "gone" before....

...but they came back.... as so many DC scum often do.

[John W]

Well, I believe this whole gang will be turned out by the American people in a vote three weeks from today. This bizarre, deadly foreign policy disaster will certainly help facilitate that.

[Rummyfan]

Accepting responsibility is only step one. The consequences of failure come second.

If she's truly responsible, she should resign immediately. She effed up and four Americans are dead. Of course she won't resign, not yet anyway.

[Phlap]

She screwed up and got the ambassador killed. She has to go.

[ROCKLOBSTER]

Attorney General Janet Reno took responsibility for the federal massacre of the Branch Davidians at Waco, Texas. “I made the decision,” Reno said at her news conference after the Waco bonfire. “I’m accountable. The buck stops with me.”

OK, she had confessed to the murder of 74 men, women and children and violated their Constitutional Rights.

Why didn't they arrest at any point and convict her? There are scores of willing accomplices that also share responsibility for the massacre.

Ditto Hitlary.