[DManA]

“Aggregate global temperatures” is a meaningless concept in the first place.

[Izzy Dunne]

Well, you have to hand it to AL Gore. He’s that good.

[New Perspective]

Interesting since I saw a Time Magazine today with a shot of some penguins on a small ice float with a caption of “Global Warming”. Yet their online collection of covers do not show this.

[The Working Man]

It’s articles like this that give me a boost of faith that the lies and deception can be overcome.

In this case it’s feels like another “Who are you going to believe me or your lying eyes” moment.

[Grampa Dave]

Reality, when it is published, often is very embarassing to the liars of the left like the anti America Enviro Terrorists.

6 years ago a younger relative returned to wino country to work in the wine industry. At that time, he was warned that due to Gorebull warming, in 5-10 years there would be no viable vineyards in Califonia. Oregone would become the premium wine grape growing center for about a decade until Gorbull warming took over them. Then Washington would become the premium wine grape growing center until Gorebull warming criped Washington and the grape growers moved to British Columbia.

The reality is that the grape growing seasons in wino country is now shorter and the average temps are down for the past 5 years. Harvest time for premium reds is later each year and shorter due to the colder days at the end of the shorter season.

[dirtboy]

Some climate scientists, such as Professor Phil Jones,director of the Climatic Research Unit at the University of East Anglia,last week dismissed the significance of the plateau,saying that 15 or 16 years is too short a period from which to draw conclusions.

This from the same folks who will point to a warm month or season as ironclad proof of global warming.

[Gaffer]

‘Professor’ Michael Mann of Penn State University is sourly pissed. His decaades of painstaking manipulation, selective sourcing, and hiding of data has been undone!

Oh, the humanity! Are there no more trees left to cut and examine?

[NonLinear]

In general it was positive. You still have to read and discern carefully. Look at this picture and the caption:

Damage: Global warming has been caused in part by the CO2 emitted by fossil fuels. This image shows smoke billowing out of a power station.

While the caption is technically true (sort of), in that on the left side are two tall smaller-diameter stacks with smoke exiting the tops (hardly "billowing"). The remaining 90% of the picture shows cooling towers with water vapor leaving the top. So, in my humble opinion, the caption is very misleading.

[chessplayer]

“This means that the ‘pause’ in global warming has now lasted for about the same time as the previous period when temperatures rose, 1980 to 1996”

---

Wrong. Warmists have claimed temps. have been increasing (with temporary pauses or downswings) ever since the beginning of the industrial revolution.

[Mygirlsmom]

Some climate scientists, such as Professor Phil Jones,director of the Climatic Research Unit at the University of East Anglia,last week dismissed the significance of the plateau,saying that 15 or 16 years is too short a period from which to draw conclusions.

But that's been 16 years of the very hightest levels of eeeeevil SUV's belching C02 in the history of man. And 16 years with no doubt the highest number of eeeeevil light bulbs burning ever...and cows farting.....and people exhaling and......

How could all this horrible human activity be going on and not having an impact? Hmmmmm??????????

[Morris70]

Time to celebrate!
Feed a cow spicy chili.
Burn leaves in yard. Careful toxic fumes
Take the long way to supermarket.

[Paladin2]

Does that mean that the CAGW alarmists have finally jawboned the climate into compliance with their visions?

[centurion316]

The climate nazis have two goals:

1. Keep the scam alive so that the massive waste of taxpayer dollars/pounds/euros will continue.

2. Convince the stupid people that’s it’s real in order to advance their political agenda.

They will ignore, debunk, or marginalize any inconvenient facts that pop up along the way.

[Iron Munro]

"It's Not Over Until I Say It's Over !!!!

[MamaTexan]

The figures, which have triggered debate among climate scientists

LOL!

Real scientists don't debate 'facts'.

[factoryrat]

DUH! My bill for winter clothing could prove that. I have to scrape the frost off of my TV screen to see the newest news on globull warming you keep talking about. Until palm trees and pineapples grow north of 45 degrees latitude outside of a greenhouse, these people are full of shit!.

[oneolcop]

Oh NOOoooooooooooo!

The poor polar bears! They'll probably freeze to death or at least won't have anywhere to swim.

Oh, the humanity!

[BradyLS]

Wish I’d invented the “climate change is America’s fault” scam.

Hmm! It’s a wee bit warmer today than it was last year, or a hundred, or a thousand years ago! Evil Americans! Give me money!

Oh, dear! It’s a wee bit cooler today than it was last year, or a hundred, or a thousand years ago! Bad citizens! Cut me a check!

[AFPhys]

I think that sometime in the last five years or so, a well known statistician/physicist(?) made a well received commentary that 17 years was an appropriate “window” for comparing temperature records. We are approaching that now, for sure. The “normal” window used by old-time climate scientists (not the dopes we have now) was well established to be 30 years.

Anyway, we are getting close to having good satellite data now for either time frame, since we’ve been collecting it since the late ‘70’s

[seowulf]

Even Prof Jones admitted that he and his colleagues did not understand the impact of ‘natural variability’–factors such as long-term ocean temperature cycles and changes in the output of the sun. However,he said he was still convinced that the current decade would end up significantly warmer than the previous two.

Faith is the substance of things hoped for; the evidence of things not seen.

He is a true believer (in a lie, of course).